Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 491–497 | Cite as

Sexual Scripts: Origins, Influences and Changes

  • William Simon
  • John H. Gagnon
Article

Abstract

The rejection of explanations of sexuality rooted in biological naturalism and sociological functionalism was the first step in formulating the scripting perspective on sexual conduct. The complex relation between intrapsychic experience, interpersonal relationships and the intersubjective cultural surround was the focus of what was first conceived as a social learning approach to sexuality. This was later transformed into a social constructionist framework as the intellectual context of the social studies of sexuality changed under the influence of feminism, gay and lesbian studies, self-psychology, and new developments in social and sexual theory in England and on the Continent. The scripting perspective has remained remarkably robust and stable as an explanatory framework for sexual conduct which is responsive to a globally changing historical and cultural environment.

sexual scripts sexual conduct biologism functionalism pragmatism Chicago School Kenneth Burke gender feminism post-structuralism self psychology sexual theory anomie 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burgess, E. (1949). The sociologic theory of psychosexual behavior. In P. Hoch & J. Zubin (Eds.), Psychosexual development in health and disease (pp. 227–243). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  2. Gagnon, J. H. (1973). Scripts and the coordination of sexual conduct. In J. K. Cole & R. Deinstbier (Eds.), 1972 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 23 (pp. 27–59). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine Books.Google Scholar
  4. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1987). The scripting of oral genital sexual conduct. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 1–25.Google Scholar
  5. Laumann, E., & Gagnon, J. H. (1994). A sociological perspective on sexual action. In R. Parker & J. Gagnon (Eds.), Conceiving sexuality: Approaches to sex in the post-modern world (pp. 183–213). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Simon, W. (1973). The social, the erotic and the sensual: The complexities of sexual scripts. In J. K. Cole & R. Deinstbier (Eds.), 1972 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 23 (pp. 61–82). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  8. Simon, W. (1996). Postmodern sexualities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. (1968). Sex talk-public and private, etc. Review of General Semantics, 25, 173–191.Google Scholar
  10. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1969). On psychosexual development. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 733–752). New York: Rand McNally. Reprinted in Trans-action, 6, 9–17.Google Scholar
  11. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1976). The anomie of affluence: A post-Mertonian conception. The American Journal of Sociology, 82, 356–378.Google Scholar
  12. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60.Google Scholar
  13. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987a). Sexual theory: A sexual scripts approach. In J. Geer & W. O'Donoghue (Eds.), Theories and paradigms of human sexuality (pp. 363–383). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  14. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987b). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Simon
  • John H. Gagnon
    • 1
  1. 1.Eden BeachNiceFrance

Personalised recommendations