Quantitative Marketing and Economics

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 23–58

Empirical Analysis of Indirect Network Effects in the Market for Personal Digital Assistants

  • Harikesh Nair
  • Pradeep Chintagunta
  • Jean-Pierre Dubé


We present a framework to measure empirically the size of indirect network effects in high-technology markets with competing incompatible technology standards. These indirect network effects arise due to inter-dependence in demand for hardware and compatible software. By modeling the joint determination of hardware sales and software availability in the market, we are able to describe the nature of demand inter-dependence and to measure the size of the indirect network effects. We apply the model to price and sales data from the industry for personal digital assistants (PDAs) along with the availability of software titles compatible with each PDA hardware standard. Our empirical results indicate significant indirect network effects. By July 2002, the network effect explains roughly 22% of the log-odds ratio of the sales of all Palm O/S compatible PDA-s to Microsoft O/S compatible PDA-s, where the remaining 78% reflects price and model features. We also use our model estimates to study the growth of the installed bases of Palm and Microsoft PDA hardware, with and without the availability of compatible third party software. We find that lack of third party software negatively impacts the evolution of the installed hardware bases of both formats. These results suggest PDA hardware firms would benefit from investing resources in increasing the provision of software for their products. We then compare the benefits of investments in software with investments in the quality of hardware technology. This exercise helps disentangle the potential for incremental hardware sales due to hardware quality improvement from that of positive feedback due to market software provision.

high-technology products indirect network effects positive feedback endogeneity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, S., A. De Palma, and J.F. Thisse. (1989). “Demand for Differentiated Products, Discrete Choice Models, and the Characteristics Approach”, Review of Economic Studies 56, 21-35.Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee, A. (1992). “A Simple Model of Herd Behavior”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 797-817.Google Scholar
  3. Basu, A., T. Mazumdar, and S.P. Raj. (2003). “Indirect Network Externality Effects on Product Attributes”, 2002, Marketing Science 22(2), 209-221.Google Scholar
  4. Bayus, Barry L., Sanjay Jain, and Ambar G. Rao. (1997). “Too Little too Early: Introduction Timing and New Product Performance in the Personal Digital Industry”, Journal of Marketing Research 34, 50-63.Google Scholar
  5. Besanko, D., S. Gupta, and D. Jain. (1998). “Logit Demand Estimation under Competitive Pricing Behavior: An Equilibrium Framework”, Management Science 44(11), 1533-1547.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, S. (1994). “Estimating Discrete Choice Models of Product Differentiation”, Rand Journal of Economics 25(2), 242-261.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes. (1995). “Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium”, Econometrica 60(4), 841-890.Google Scholar
  8. Bikhchandani, S., D. Hirshleifer, and I. Welch. (1998). “Learning from the Behavior of others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, 151-170.Google Scholar
  9. Bresnahan, T. (2002). “The Economics of the Microsoft Case”, Working Paper, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  10. Brynjolfsson, E. and C. Kemerer. (1996). “Network Externalities in Microcomputer Software: An Econometric Analysis of the Spreadsheet Market”, Management Science 42(12), 1627-2647.Google Scholar
  11. Caminal, P. and Xavier Vives. (1996). “Why Market Shares Matter: An Information Based Theory”, Rand Journal of Economics 27(2), 221-239.Google Scholar
  12. Cardell, N.S. (1997). “Variance Component Structures for the Extreme Value and Logistic Distributions with Applications to Models of Heterogeneity”, Econometric Theory 13, 185-213.Google Scholar
  13. Chou, C.F. and O. Shy. (1996). “Do Consumers Gain or Lose When More People Buy the Same Brand?” European Journal of Political Economy 12, 309-330.Google Scholar
  14. Church, J. and N. Gandal. (1992). “Network Effects, Software Provision, and Standardization”, Journal of Industrial Economics 40, 85-104.Google Scholar
  15. Dixit, A. and J. Stiglitz. (1977). “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity”, American Economic Review 67, 297-308.Google Scholar
  16. Economides, N. and Charles Himmelberg. (1995). “Critical Mass and Network Size with Applications to the US Fax Market”, Discussion Paper no. EC-95-11, Stern School of Business, N.Y.U.Google Scholar
  17. Gandal, N. (1994). “Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test for Network Externalities”, Rand Journal of Economics 25(1), 160-170.Google Scholar
  18. Gandal, N., M. Kende, and R. Rob. (2000). “The Dynamics of Technological Adoption in Hardware/Software Systems: The Case of Compact Disc Players”, Rand Journal of Economics 31-1.Google Scholar
  19. Gupta, S., D. Jain, and M.S. Sawhney. (1999). “Modeling the Evolution of Markets with Indirect Network Externalities: An Application to Digital Television”, Marketing Science 18(3), 396-416.Google Scholar
  20. Karaca-Mandic, P. (2003). “Network Effects in Technology Adoption: The Case of DVD Players”, Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  21. Ohashi, H. (2003). “The Role of Network Externalities in the US VCR Market; 1978–86”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 12(4), Winter.Google Scholar
  22. Pakes, A. and D. Pollard. (1989). “Simulation and the Asymptotics of Optimization Estimators”, Econometrica 57, 1027-1057.Google Scholar
  23. Park, S. (2002a). “Quantitative Analysis of Network Externalities in Competing Technologies: The VCR Case”, Working Paper, SUNY at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  24. Park, S. (2002b). “Linear Network Benefit Function in the Presence of Indirect Network Externalities”, Working Paper, SUNY at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  25. Rysman, M. (2003). “Competition Between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages”, Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  26. Saloner, G. and A. Shepard. (1995). “Adoption of Technologies with Network Externalities: An Empirical Examination of the Adoption of Automated Teller Machines”, Rand Journal of Economics 26(3), 479-501.Google Scholar
  27. Shankar, V. and B. Bayus. (2003). “Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Video Game Industry”, 2002, Strategic Management Journal, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro, C. and Hal R. Varian. (1999). “Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy”, Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  29. Song, I. and P.K. Chintagunta. (2003), “A Micromodel of New Product Adoption with Heterogeneous and Forward-Looking Consumers: Application to the Digital Camera Category”, Quantitative Marketing and Economics 1(4), 371-407.Google Scholar
  30. Spence, M. (1976). “Product Selection, Fixed Costs and Monopolistic Competition”, Review of Economic Studies 43, 217-235.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harikesh Nair
    • 1
  • Pradeep Chintagunta
    • 2
  • Jean-Pierre Dubé
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessUniversity of ChicagoChicago
  2. 2.Graduate School of BusinessUniversity of ChicagoChicago
  3. 3.Graduate School of BusinessUniversity of ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations