Public Choice

, Volume 118, Issue 3–4, pp 341–364 | Cite as

The Determinants of Vote Intentions in Portugal

  • Francisco José Veiga
  • Linda Gonçalves Veiga

Abstract

This paper offers new insights on theinteractions between economics and politicsin Portugal. We use two unexplored datasets consisting of monthly polls on voteintentions for the main political partiesin Portugal and responses to a consumersurvey containing a battery of questions oneconomic evaluations. The analysis coversthe interval from 1986 to 2001. We findthat: (1) right-wing governments arepenalized for higher inflation while theleft-wing ones are not, (2) left-winggovernments are more penalized forincreases in the unemployment rate; (3)voters base their evaluations ofincumbents' performances on perceptions ofpast and current economic conditions,rather than on expected future economicoutcomes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina, A. and Cukierman, A. (1990). The politics of ambiguity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105: 829–850.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, A. (Ed.). Political handbook of the world. New York: McGraw-Hill. Several issues.Google Scholar
  3. Colomer, J.M. (1996). Spain and Portugal: Rule by party leadership. In J.M. Colomer (Ed.), Political institutions in Europe, 170–210. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  5. Fair, R.C. (1978). The effect of economic events on votes for President. The Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 159–173.Google Scholar
  6. Frey, B.S. and Schneider, F. (1978). An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 174–183.Google Scholar
  7. Goodhart, C.A.E. and Bhansali, R.J. (1970). Political economy. Political Studies 18: 43–106.Google Scholar
  8. Harrington, J. Jr. (1993). Economic policy, economic performance, and elections. American Economic Review 83: 27–42.Google Scholar
  9. Hibbs, D.A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71: 1467–1487.Google Scholar
  10. Kirchgässner, G. (1986). Economic conditions and the popularity of West German parties: A survey. European Journal of Political Research 14: 421–539.Google Scholar
  11. Kramer, G.H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in US voting behavior, 1896–1964. American Political Science Review 65: 131–143.Google Scholar
  12. Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective number of parties: A measure with application to Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–21.Google Scholar
  13. Lanoue, D.J. and Headrick, B. (1994). Prime Ministers, parties and the public: The dynamics of government popularity in Great Britain. Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 191–209.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1988). Economics and elections. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  15. Magone, J.M. (1997), European Portugal: A difficult road to sustainable democracy. Riverside, NJ: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Mueller, J.E. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review 64: 18–23.Google Scholar
  17. Nannestad, P. and Paldam, M. (1994). The VP-function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice 79: 213–245.Google Scholar
  18. Person, T. and Tabbellini, G. (2000). Political economics — explaining economic policy. Cambridge, MA and London, U.K.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Powell, G.B. Jr. and Whitten, G.D. (1993). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science 37: 391–414.Google Scholar
  20. Rogoff, K. and Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic cycles. Review of Economic Studies 55: 1–16.Google Scholar
  21. Smyth, D.J., Washburn, S.K. and Dua, P. (1989). Social preferences, inflation, unemployment, and political business cycles: Econometric evidence for the Reagan Presidency. Southern Economic Journal 56: 336–348.Google Scholar
  22. Stigler, G. (1973). General economic conditions and national elections. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 63: 308–315.Google Scholar
  23. Swank, O.H. (1993). Popularity functions based on partisan theory. Public Choice 75: 339–356.Google Scholar
  24. Veiga, L.G. (1998). Popularity functions for the Portuguese Prime Minister, Government, Parliament and President. European Journal of Political Research 33: 347–361.Google Scholar
  25. World Europa Yearbook. London: Europa Publications. Several issues.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco José Veiga
    • 1
  • Linda Gonçalves Veiga
    • 2
  1. 1.Núcleo de Investigação em Políticas Económicas (NIPE)Universidade do MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.Núcleo de Investigação em Políticas Económicas (NIPE)Universidade do MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations