Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 253–266 | Cite as

Do After School Programs Reduce Delinquency?

  • Denise C. Gottfredson
  • Stephanie A. Gerstenblith
  • David A. Soulé
  • Shannon C. Womer
  • Shaoli Lu
Article

Abstract

After school programs (ASPs) are popular and receive substantial public funding. Aside from their child-care and supervision value, ASPs often provide youth development and skill-building activities that might reduce delinquent behavior. These possibilities and the observation that arrests for juvenile crime peak between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m. on school days have increased interest in the delinquency prevention potential of ASPs. This study examined effects of participation in ASPs conducted in Maryland during the 1999-2000 school year and the mechanism through which such programs may affect delinquent behavior. Results imply that participation reduced delinquent behavior for middle-school but not for elementary-school-aged youths. This reduction was not achieved by decreasing time spent unsupervised or by increasing involvement in constructive activities, but by increasing intentions not to use drugs and positive peer associations. Effects on these outcomes were strongest in programs that incorporated a high emphasis on social skills and character development.

after school programs delinquency prevention substance abuse prevention 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Advocates for Children and Youth. (1999). House Speaker, Key Legislators, 130 Groups Endorse After-School Legislation. Press Release.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, J., Philliber, S., & Hoggson, N. (1990). School-based preven-tion of teen-age pregnancy and school dropout: Process eval-uation of the National Replication of the Teen Outreach Pro-gram. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 505-524.Google Scholar
  3. Bachman, J. G. (1975). Youth in transition: Documentation manual (Vol. 2). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, D., & Witt, P. (1996). Evaluation of the Impact of Two After-School Programs. Journal of Park and Recreation Administra-tion, 14, 60-81.Google Scholar
  5. Biglan, A., Metzler, C. W., Wirt, R., Ary, D., Noell, J., Ochs, L., French, C., & Hood, D. (1990). Social and behavioral factors associated with high-risk sexual behaviors among adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 245-261.Google Scholar
  6. Block, J., Block, J., & Keyes, S. (1988). Longitudinally foretelling drug usage in adolescence: Early childhood personality and environmental precursors. Child Development, 59, 336-355.Google Scholar
  7. Carlini-Cotrim, B., & Aparecida de Carvalho, V. (1993). Extracur-ricular activities: Are they an effective strategy against drug consumption? Journal of Drug Education, 23, 97-104.Google Scholar
  8. Cernkovich, S. A., & Giordano, P. C. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 25, 295-321.Google Scholar
  9. Delinquency Research Group. (1986). An evaluation of the delin-quency of participants in the Youth at Risk Program. Clare-mont, CA: Center for Applied Social Research, The Clare-mont Graduate School.Google Scholar
  10. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172-180.Google Scholar
  11. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Farkas, S., & Johnson, J. (1997). Kids these days: What Ameri-cans really think about the next generation. New York: Public Agenda.Google Scholar
  13. Fashola, O. (1998). Review of extended-day and after-school pro-grams and their effectiveness. Washington, DC: Center for Re-search on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.Google Scholar
  14. Gottfredson, D. C., Gottfredson, G. D., & Weisman, S. A. (2001). The timing of delinquent behavior and its implications for after-school programs. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 61-86.Google Scholar
  15. Gottfredson, D. C., Wilson, D. B., & Najaka, S. S. (2002). School-based crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. P. Farrington, B. C. Welsh, & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Gottfredson, G. D. (1984). The effective school battery: User's man-ual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Gottfredson, G. D., & Gottfredson, D. C. (1999). What about you? Ellicott City, MD: Gottfredson Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Huizinga, D., & Jakob-Chien, C. (1998). The contemporaneous co-occurrence of serious and violent juvenile offending and other problem behavior. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful intervention (pp. 47-67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Jenkins, J. (1996). The influence of peer affiliation and student ac-tivities on adolescent drug involvement. Adolescence, 31, 297-306.Google Scholar
  23. Jessor, R. (1976). Predicting time of onset of marijuana use: A de-velopment study of high school youths. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 44, 125-134.Google Scholar
  24. Jessor, R., Chase, J. A., & Donovan, J. E. (1980). Psychosocial cor-relates of marijuana use and problem drinking in a national sample of adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 70, 604-613.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, M., & Offord, D. (1989). Reduction of antisocial behavior in poor children by nonschool skill-development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 30, 737-750.Google Scholar
  26. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Kandel, D. B., Kessler, R. C., & Margulies, R. Z. (1978). An-tecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis. In D. Kandel (Ed.), Longitudi-nal research on drug use: Empirical findings and method-ological issues (pp. 73-99). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  28. Lipsey, M. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: Ameta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartman, L. V. Hedges, R. V. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-128). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for se-rious juvenile offenders. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful intervention (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thou-sand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Mahoney, J. L. (2000). School extracurricular activity participation as a moderator in the development of antisocial patterns. Child Development, 71, 502-516.Google Scholar
  32. Mahoney, J. L., Stattin, H., & Magnusson, D. (2000). Youth recre-ation centre participation and criminal offending: A 20-year longitudinal study of Swedish boys. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 1-12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise C. Gottfredson
    • 1
  • Stephanie A. Gerstenblith
    • 1
  • David A. Soulé
    • 1
  • Shannon C. Womer
    • 1
  • Shaoli Lu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeThe University of MarylandCollege ParkMaryland
  2. 2.Student in the Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences Program at Columbia UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations