Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 231–243 | Cite as

Attitudes and Dating Aggression: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach

  • Julie A. Schumacher
  • Amy M. Smith Slep
Article

Abstract

This study examined the association between attitudes about dating aggression and select dating aggressive behaviors (verbal aggression and jealous behavior) in high school students. Our hypothesis, derived from cognitive dissonance theory, was that discrepancies between self-reported attitudes and aggressive behavior at Time 1 (i.e., putative cognitive dissonance) would predict decreases in aggression between Time 1 and Time 2 beyond what would be predicted by change in attitudes over the same period. Results indicated that cognitive dissonance (as indexed by the discrepancy between attitudes and behavior) was generally a significant predictor of behavior change, providing significant improvement in prediction of behavior over attitude change alone. We discuss the implications of these findings for prevention efforts and directions for future research in this area.

dating violence cognitive dissonance attitudes verbal aggression jealousy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relationship: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.Google Scholar
  2. Arias, I., Samios, M. & O'Leary, K. D. (1987). Prevalence and correlates of physical aggression during courtship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 82-90.Google Scholar
  3. Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In E. Harmon-Jones, & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103-126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Avery-Leaf, S., Cascardi, M., O'Leary, K. D., & Cano, A. (1997). Efficacy of a dating violence prevention program on attitudes justifying aggression. Journal of Adolescent Health, 21, 11-17.Google Scholar
  5. Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.Google Scholar
  6. Bergman, L. (1992). Dating violence among high school students. Social Work, 37, 21-27.Google Scholar
  7. Bookwala, J., Frieze, I. H., Smith, C., & Ryan, K. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7, 297-311.Google Scholar
  8. Breslin, C. F., Riggs, D. S., O'Leary, K. D., & Arias, I. (1990). Family precursors: Expected and actual consequences of dating aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 247-258.Google Scholar
  9. Burcky, W., Reuterman, N., & Kopsky, S. (1988). Dating violence among high school students. School Counselor, 35, 353-358.Google Scholar
  10. Byers, E. S., & Eno, R. J. (1991). Predicting men's sexual coercion and aggression from attitudes, dating history, and sexual response. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 4, 55-70.Google Scholar
  11. Cano, A., Avery-Leaf, S., Cascardi, M., & O'Leary, K. D. (1998). Dating Violence in Two High School Samples: Discriminating Variables. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 431-446.Google Scholar
  12. Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., & Vivian, D. (1992). Marital aggression: Impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 1178-1184.Google Scholar
  13. Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S., O'Leary, K. D., & Slep, A. M. S. (1999). Factor structure and convergent validity of the Conflict Tactics Scale in high school students. Psychological Assessment, 11, 546-555.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, J. (1999). Unwanted consequences and the self: In search of the motivation for dissonance reduction. In E. Harmon-Jones, & J. Mills (Eds.). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 149-173). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  15. Dickerson, C., Thibodeau, R., Arsonson, E., & Miller, D. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 841-854.Google Scholar
  16. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  17. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  19. Foo, L., & Margolin, G. (1996). Amultivariate investigation of dating aggression. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 351-377.Google Scholar
  20. Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X. B., Helms, R., Koch, G. G., & Linder, G. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, and adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45-50.Google Scholar
  21. Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Greene, W. F., Koch, G. G., Linder, G. F., & MacDougal, J. E. (2000). The Safe Dates Program: 1-year follow-up results. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1619-1622.Google Scholar
  22. Foshee, V. A., Linder, G. F., Bauman, K. E., Langwick, S. A., Arriaga, X. B., Heath, J. L., McMahon, P. M., & Bangdiwala, S. (1996). The Safe Dates Project: Theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 12(Suppl.), 39-47.Google Scholar
  23. Henton, J. M., Cate, R. M., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., & Christopher, F. S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 467-482.Google Scholar
  24. Jaffe, P. G., Sudermann, M., Reitzel, D., & Killip, S. M. (1992). An evaluation of a secondary school primary prevention program on violence in intimate relationships. Violence and Victims, 7, 129-146.Google Scholar
  25. Kasian, M., & Painter, S. L. (1992). Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population. Journal of Interper-sonal Violence, 7, 350-364.Google Scholar
  26. Kirby, D. (2000). School-based interventions to prevent unprotected sex and HIV among adolescents. In J. L. Peterson, & R. J. DiClemente (Eds.), Handbook of HIV prevention (pp. 83-101). New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Lane, K. E., & Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A. (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 45-59.Google Scholar
  28. Laner, M. R., & Thompson, J. (1982). Abuse and aggression in courting couples. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Jour-nal, 3, 229-244.Google Scholar
  29. Lavoie, F., Vèzina, L., Pichè, C., & Boivin, M. (1995). Evaluation of a prevention program for violence in teen dating relationships.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 516-524.Google Scholar
  30. MacGowan, M. J. (1997). An evaluation of a dating violence prevention program for middle school students. Violence and Victims, 12, 223-235.Google Scholar
  31. Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97-102.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  33. National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH] (2000). Translating behavioral science into action: Report of the National Advisory Mental Health Council Behavioral Science Workgroup (NIH Publication No. 00-4699).Google Scholar
  34. O'Brien, M. K., Cascardi, M., & Avery-Leaf, S. (July, 1999). Dis-criminating variables of dating violence in a middle school sample. Paper presented in Symposium (S. Avery-Leaf), "The BRIGHT program: An evaluation of a dating violence pre-vention curriculum in an urban middle school setting" at the 6th International Family Violence Conference, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
  35. O'Keefe, M. (1997). Predictors of dating violence among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 546-568.Google Scholar
  36. O'Keefe, N. K., Brockopp, K., & Chew, E. (1986). Teen dating vio-lence. Social Work, 31, 465-468.Google Scholar
  37. O'Leary, K. D., Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenbaum, A., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical ag-gression between spouses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 263-268.Google Scholar
  38. O'Leary, K. D., & Slep, A. M. S. (2003). A dyadic model of adoles-cent dating aggression. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psy-chology. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 314-327.Google Scholar
  39. Paglia, A., & Room, R. (1999). Preventing substance use problems among youth: Aliterature review and recommendations. Jour-nal of Primary Prevention, 20, 3-50Google Scholar
  40. Pederson, P., & Thomas, C. D. (1992). Prevalence and cor-relates of dating violence in a Canadian university sam-ple. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 490-501.Google Scholar
  41. Price, E. L., & Byers, E. S. (1999). The Attitudes Towards Dating Violence Scales: Development and initial validation. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 351-375.Google Scholar
  42. Reitzel-Jaffe, D., & Wolfe, D. A. (2001). Predictors of relationship abuse among young men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 99-115.Google Scholar
  43. Reuterman, N. A., & Burcky, W. D. (1989). Dating violence in high school: A profile of the victims. Psychology, 26, 1-9.Google Scholar
  44. Riggs, D. S. (1993). Relationship problems and dating aggression: A potential treatment target. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 18-35.Google Scholar
  45. Riggs, D. S., & O'Leary, K. D. (1996). Aggression between het-erosexual dating partners: An examination of a causal model of courtship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 519-540.Google Scholar
  46. Roscoe, B., & Callahan, J. E. (1983). Adolescent's self report of violence in families and dating relationships. Adolescence, 10, 545-553.Google Scholar
  47. Roscoe, B., & Kelsey, T. (1986). Dating violence among high school students. Psychology: AQuarterly Journal of HumanBehavior, 23, 53-59.Google Scholar
  48. Schumacher, J. A., Slep, A. M. S., & O'Leary, K. D. (1998, Novem-ber). The context and consequences of female to male dating aggression. Poster presented at the 32nd annual convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  49. Sigelman, C. K., Berry, C. J., & Wiles, K. A. (1984). Violence in col-lege students' dating relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 530-548.Google Scholar
  50. Slep, A. M. S., Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S., & O'Leary, K. D. (2001). Two new measures of attitudes accepting of teen dating aggres-sion. Psychological Assessment, 13, 306-318.Google Scholar
  51. Stone, J., Aronson, E., Crain, A. L., Winslow, M. P., & Fried, C. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bul-letin, 20, 116-128.Google Scholar
  52. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-86.Google Scholar
  53. Sugarman, D. B., & Frankel, S. L. (1996). Patriachal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Vio-lence, 11, 13-40.Google Scholar
  54. Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psycholog-ical maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.Google Scholar
  55. Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  56. White, J. W., & Koss, M. P. (1991). Courtship violence: Incidence in a national sample of higher education students. Violence and Victims, 6, 247-256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie A. Schumacher
    • 1
  • Amy M. Smith Slep
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute on AddictionsUniversity of Buffalo, The State University of New YorkBuffaloNew York
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookNew York

Personalised recommendations