Precision Agriculture

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 131–144 | Cite as

Efficacy of Grid and Zone Soil Sampling Approaches for Site-Specific Assessment of Phosphorus, Potassium, pH, and Organic Matter

  • Antonio P. Mallarino
  • David J. Wittry

Abstract

Within-field variability of plant-available nutrients often results in different fertilizer requirements across a field. There is uncertainty concerning the efficacy of alternative sampling strategies suitable for site-specific management. This study compared various soil sampling approaches for P, K, pH, and organic matter (OM) in eight agricultural fields. Soil samples were collected using an intensive 0.2-ha grid-point procedure, and were used to compare less intensive sampling approaches. The approaches were based on 1.2–1.6-ha grid cells (Grid), soil series of digitized soil survey maps (SSM), soil series of detailed soil survey (1:12,000 scale) maps, elevation zones, and management zones based on various information layers (ZS). The approaches varied in reducing the within-unit soil-test variability and maximizing mean soil-test values across sampling units, but none was superior across all fields and nutrients. All approaches were less efficient for P and K than for pH or OM. The Grid and ZS approach were the most effective across all nutrients and fields. However, the Grid approach was more effective for P, the Grid and ZS approaches were better for K and pH, and the SSM and ZS approaches were better for OM. The ZS approach often resulted in fewer sampling zones than the Grid approach, which implies lower soil testing costs for producers, but required more knowledge and subjective judgement than a Grid approach to adapt it to field-specific conditions.

grid sampling management zones site-specific management soil sampling zone sampling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Birrell, S. J., Sudduth, K. A. and Kitchen, N. R. 1996. Nutrient mapping implications of short-range variability. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 207–216.Google Scholar
  2. Borges, R. and Mallarino, A. P. 1998. Significance of spatially variable soil phosphorus and potassium for early growth and nutrient content of no-till corn and soybean. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29, 2589–2605.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J. R. 1998. Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. North Central Regional Publication No. 221 (Rev.) (Missouri Agriculture Experimental Station, Columbia, Missouri, USA), p. 72.Google Scholar
  4. Bullock, D. G., Hoeft, R. G., Dorman, P., Macy, T. and Olson, R. 1994. Nutrient management with intensive soil sampling and differential fertilizer spreading. Better Crops with Plant Food 78, 10–12.Google Scholar
  5. Cahn, M. D., Hummel, J. W. and Brouer, B. H. 1994. Spatial analysis of soil fertility for soil-specific crop management. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 1240–1248.Google Scholar
  6. Cambardella, C. A., Moorman, T. B., Novak, J. M., Parkin, T. B., Karlen, D. L., Turco, R. F. and Konopka, A. E. 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 1501–1511.Google Scholar
  7. Carr, P. M., Carlson, G. R., Jacobsen, J. S., Nielsen, G. A. and Skogley, E. O. 1991. Farming soils not fields: A strategy for increasing fertilizer profitability. Journal of Production Agriculture 4, 57–61.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, F., Kissel, D. E., West, L. T. and Adkins, W. 2000. Field-scale mapping of surface soil organic carbon using remotely sensed imagery. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 746–753.Google Scholar
  9. Colvin, T. S., Jaynes, D. B., Karlen, D. L., Laird, D. A. and Ambuel, J. R. 1997. Yield variability within a central Iowa field. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 40, 883–889.Google Scholar
  10. Doolittle, J. A., Sudduth, K. A., Kitchen, N. R. and Indorante, S. J. 1994. Estimating depths to claypans using electromagnetic induction methods. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49, 572–575.Google Scholar
  11. Fleming, K. L., Westfall, D. G., Wiens, D. W. and Brodahl, M. C. 2000. Evaluating farmer defined management zone maps for variable rate fertilizer application. Precision Agriculture 2, 201–215.Google Scholar
  12. Franzen, W. D. and Peck, T. R. 1995. Field soil sampling density for variable rate fertilization. Journal of Production Agriculture 8, 568–574.Google Scholar
  13. Franzen, D. W., Cihacek, L. J., Hofman, V. L. and Swenson, L. J. 1998. Topography-based sampling compared to grid sampling in the Northern Great Plains. Journal of Production Agriculture 11, 364–370.Google Scholar
  14. Franzen, D. W., Halvorson, A. D. and Hofman, V. L. 2000. Management zones for soil N and P levels in the Northern Great Plains. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), CD-ROM computer file.Google Scholar
  15. Gotway, C. A., Ferguson, R. B. and Hergert, G. W. 1996. The effects of mapping and scale on variable-rate fertilizer recommendations for corn. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 321–330.Google Scholar
  16. Gupta, R. K., Mostaghimi, S., McClellan, P. W., Alley, M. M. and Brann, D. E. 1997. Spatial variability and sampling strategies for NO3-N, P and K determinations for site-specific farming. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 40, 337–343.Google Scholar
  17. Hammond, M. W. 1993. Cost analysis of variable fertility management of phosphorus and potassium for potato production in central Washington. In: Soil-Specific Crop Management, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-SSSA-CSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 213–228.Google Scholar
  18. Han, S., Hummel, J. W., Goering, C. E. and Cahn, M. D. 1994. Cell size selection for site-specific crop management. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 37, 19–26.Google Scholar
  19. Kitchen, N. R., Sudduth, K. A. and Drummond, S. T. 1999. Soil electrical conductivity as a crop productivity measure for claypan soils. Journal of Production Agriculture 12, 607–617.Google Scholar
  20. Mallarino, A. P. 1996. Spatial variability patterns of phosphorus and potassium in no-tilled soils for two sampling scales. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60, 1473–1481.Google Scholar
  21. Mallarino, A. P. and Wittry, D. J. 1997. Use of DGPS, yield monitors, soil testing and variable rate technology to improve phosphorus and potassium management. In: Proceedings of The Integrated Crop Management Conference (Iowa State University Extension, Ames, Iowa, USA), p. 267–275.Google Scholar
  22. Mallarino, A. P. and Wittry, D. J. 1998. Soil sampling strategies for variable rate P and K fertilization and liming. In: Proceedings of The Integrated Crop Management Conference (Iowa State University Extension, Ames, Iowa, USA), p. 251–256.Google Scholar
  23. Mallarino, A. P., Wittry, D. J., Dousa, D. and Hinz, P. N. 1998. Variable-rate phosphorus fertilization: On-farm research methods and evaluation for corn and soybean. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 687–696.Google Scholar
  24. Mausbach, M. J., Lytle, D. J. and Spevey, L. D. 1993. Application of soil survey information to soil specific farming. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 57–68.Google Scholar
  25. McCann, B. L., Pennick, D. J., van Kessel, C. and Walley, F. L. 1996. The development of management units for site-specific farming. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 295–302.Google Scholar
  26. McGraw, T. 1994. Soil test variability in southern Minnesota. Better Crops with Plant Food 78, 24–25.Google Scholar
  27. Mohamed, S. B., Evans, E. J. and Shiel, R. S. 1996. Mapping techniques and intensity of soil sampling for precision farming. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 217–226.Google Scholar
  28. Mulla, D. J., Sekely, A. C. and Beatty, M. 2000. Evaluation of remote sensing and targeted soil sampling for variable rate application of lime. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), CD-ROM computer file.Google Scholar
  29. Nolin, M. C., Guertin, S. P. and Wang, C. 1996. Within-field spatial variability of soil nutrients and corn yield in a Montreal lowlands clay soil. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 257–270.Google Scholar
  30. Peck, T. R. and Melsted, S. W. 1973. Field sampling for soil testing. In: Soil Testing and Plant Analysis (Rev.), edited by L. M. Walsh and J. D. Beaton (Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 67–75.Google Scholar
  31. Penney, D. C., Nolan, S. C., McKenzie, R. C., Goddard, T. W. and Kryzanowski, L. 1996. Yield and nutrient mapping for site specific fertilizer management. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 27, 1265–1279.Google Scholar
  32. Pocknee, S., Boydell, B. C. Green, H. M. Waters, D. J. and Kvien, C. K. 1996. Directed soil sampling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 159–168.Google Scholar
  33. Rehm, G. W., Lamb, J. A., Davis, J. G. and Malzer, G. L. 1996. P and K grid sampling: What does it yield us? In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 949–956.Google Scholar
  34. Sawyer, J. E. 1994. Concepts of variable rate technology with considerations for fertilizer application. Journal of Production Agriculture 7, 195–201.Google Scholar
  35. Schepers, J. S., Schlemmer, M. R. and Ferguson, R. B. 2000. Site-specific considerations for managing phosphorus. Journal of Environmental Quality 29, 125–130.Google Scholar
  36. Schnitkey, G. D., Hopkins, J. W. and Tweeten, L. G. 1996. An economic evaluation of precision fertilizer applications on corn-soybean fields. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 977–987.Google Scholar
  37. Stafford, J. V., Lark, R. M. and Bolam, H. C. 1998. Using yield maps to regionalize fields into potential management units. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 225–237.Google Scholar
  38. Voss, R. D., Sawyer, J. E., Mallarino, A. P. and Killorn, R. 1999. General Guide for Crop Nutrient Recommendations in Iowa. Extension Publication Pm-1688 (Rev.) (Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA), p. 19.Google Scholar
  39. Wibawa, W. D., Dludlu, D. L., Swenson, L. J., Hopkins, D. G. and Dahnke, W. C. 1993. Variable fertilizer application based on yield goal, soil fertility and soil map unit. Journal of Production Agriculture 6, 225–261.Google Scholar
  40. Wollenhaupt, N. C., Wolkowski, R. P. and Clayton, M. K. 1994. Mapping soil test phosphorus and potassium for variable-rate fertilizer application. Journal of Production Agriculture 7, 441–448.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio P. Mallarino
    • 1
  • David J. Wittry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations