, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 429–456 | Cite as

An Exploration of the Relationship between Timing and Duration of Maintenance Activities

  • Ram M. Pendyala
  • Chandra R. Bhat


The timing and duration of an activity episode are two important temporal aspects of activity-travel behavior. Understanding the causal relationship between these two variables would be useful in the development of activity-based travel demand modeling systems. This paper investigates the relationship between these two variables by considering two different causal structures – one structure in which time-of-day choice is determined first and influences duration and a second structure in which activity duration is determined first and affects time-of-day choice. These two structures are estimated within a discrete-continuous simultaneous equations framework employing a full-information maximum likelihood methodology that allows error covariance. The estimation is performed separately for commuter and non-commuter samples drawn from a 1996 household travel survey data set from the Tampa Bay area in Florida. The results of the model estimation effort show that the causal structure in which activity duration precedes or affects activity timing (time of day choice) performs better for the non-commuter sample. For the commuter sample, the findings were less conclusive with both causal structures offering equally good statistical measures of fit. In addition, for the commuter sample, all error correlations were found to be zero. These two findings suggest that time of day choice and activity episode duration are only loosely related for the commuter sample, possibly due to the relatively non-discretionary and inflexible work activity and travel.

activity duration activity timing activity-travel behavior causal structure simultaneous equations time of day 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abkowitz MD (1981) An analysis of the commuter departure time decision. Transportation 10: 283–297.Google Scholar
  2. Axhausen K & Garling T (1992) Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: Conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transport Reviews 12: 493–517.Google Scholar
  3. Barnard PO & Hensher DA (1992) Joint estimation of a polychotomous discrete-continuous choice system: An analysis of the spatial distribution of retail expenditures. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy XXVI(3): 299–312.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Akiva M & Lerman SR (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bhat CR (1996) A hazard-based duration model of shopping activity with nonparametric baseline specification and nonparametric control for unobserved heterogeneity. Transportation Research B 30(1): 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhat CR (1998) A model of post-home arrival activity participation behavior. Transportation Research B 32(6): 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhat CR & Koppelman FS (1999) A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research.Transportation 26(2): 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhat CR & Misra R (1999) Discretionary activity time allocation of individuals between in-home and out-of-home and between weekdays and weekends. Transportation 26(2): 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhat CR & Singh SK (2000) A comprehensive daily activity-travel generation model system for workers. Transportation Research A 34(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comte F (1998) Discrete and continuous time co-integration. Journal of Econometrics 88(2): 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doherty ST & Miller EJ (2000) A computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transportation 27(1): 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feller W (1971) An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Goulias KG (1997) Activity-based travel forecasting: What are some issues? In: Texas Transportation Institute (ed) Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference, June 2-5, 1996: Summary, Recommendations, and Compendium of Papers (pp. 37–49), Travel Model Improvement Program, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Hamed M & Mannering FL (1993) Modeling travelers' postwork activity involvement: Toward a new methodology. Transportation Science 27(4): 381–394.Google Scholar
  15. Hanemann WM (1984) Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica 52: 541–561.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey AS & Taylor ME (2000) Activity settings and travel behavior: A social contact perspective. Transportation 32(1): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunt JD & Patterson DM (1996) A stated preference examination of time of travel choice for a recreational trip. Journal of Advanced Transportation 30(3): 17–44.Google Scholar
  18. Kasturirangan K, Pendyala RM & Koppelman FS (2002) Role of history in modeling daily activity frequency and duration for commuters. In: Transportation Research Record 1807, Journal of Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 129–136.Google Scholar
  19. Kitamura R, Yamamoto T, Fujii S & Sampath S (1996) A discrete-continuous analysis of time allocation to two types of discretionary activities which accounts for unobserved heterogeneity. In: Lesort JB (ed) Transportation and Traffic Theory (pp. 431–453). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  20. Kitamura R, Chen C, Pendyala RM & Narayanan R (2000) Micro-simulation of activity-travel patterns for travel demand forecasting. Transportation 27(1): 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee LF (1983) Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica 51(2): 507–512.Google Scholar
  22. Levinson D & Kumar A (1995) Activity, travel, and the allocation of time. Journal of the American Planning Association 61(4): 458–470.Google Scholar
  23. Maddala GS (1983) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mahmassani H & Chang GL (1985) Dynamic aspects of departure-time choice behavior in a commuting system: Theoretical framework and experimental analysis. Transportation Research Record 1037, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 88–101.Google Scholar
  25. Mahmassani H & Stephan D (1988) Experimental investigation of route and departure time dynamics of urban commuters. Transportation Research Record 1203, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 69–84.Google Scholar
  26. Mannering F, Murakami E & Kim SG (1994) Models of travelers' activity choice and home-stay duration: Analysis of functional form and temporal stability. Transportation 21(4): 371–392.Google Scholar
  27. Mannering FL & Hensher DA (1987) Discrete-continuous econometric models and their application to transport analysis. Transport Reviews 7(3): 227–244.Google Scholar
  28. Pas EI & Harvey AS (1997) Time use research and travel demand analysis and modeling. In: Stopher PR & Lee-Gosselin M (eds) Understanding Travel Behavior in an Era of Change (pp. 315–338). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  29. Pendyala RM, Kitamura R, Chen C & Pas EI (1997) An activity-based micro-simulation analysis of transportation control measures. Transport Policy 4(3): 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pendyala RM, Kitamura R & Reddy DVGP (1998) Application of an activity-based travel demand model incorporating a rule-based algorithm. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25: 753–772.Google Scholar
  31. Pendyala RM, Yamamoto T & Kitamura R (2002) On the formulation of time space prisms to model constraints on personal activity-travel engagement. Transportation 29(1): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steed J & Bhat CR (2000) On modeling the departure time choice for home-based social/recreational and shopping trips. Transportation Research Record 1706, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 152–159.Google Scholar
  33. Van Garderen KJ (2001) Optimal prediction in log-linear models. Journal of Econometrics 104(1): 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang JJ (1996) Timing utility of daily activities and its impact on travel. Transportation Research A 30: 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wen C-H & Koppelman FS (2000) A conceptual and methodological framework for the generation of activity travel patterns. Transportation Research B 32(1): 5–23.Google Scholar
  36. Yamamoto T & Kitamura R (1999) An analysis of time allocation to in-home and out-of-home discretionary activities across working days and non-working days. Transportation 26(2): 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ram M. Pendyala
    • 1
  • Chandra R. Bhat
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of South Florida, ENB 118TampaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations