Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 327–358

Occupational Status in 2000; Over a Century of Census-Based Measurement

  • Charles B. Nam
  • Monica Boyd
Article

Abstract

The Nam–Powers–Boyd Occupational Status Scale for the year 2000 is introduced here. It is the sixth in a decennial series of such scales that were initiated at the Census Bureau a half century earlier. The bureau's examination of occupational status actually goes back to the end of the 19th century and its thread continues today. The historical background of the 2000 scale, the methodology for constructing the scores, some comparisons with other occupational scales, the 2000 scores themselves, and applications of the 2000 scores are presented.

Measurement Occupations Socioeconomic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, W.A. (1927-1928). Occupational attitudes and choices of a group of college men, 1 and 2, Social Forces 6: 278-283, 467-473.Google Scholar
  2. Baunach, D.M. (2002). Trends in occupational sex segregation and inequality, 1950- 1990, Social Science Research 31(1): 77-98.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, P.M. & Duncan, O.D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Blishen, B.R. (1958). The construction and use of an occupational class scale, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 24: 519-531.Google Scholar
  5. Bogue, D.J. (1962). Skid row in American cities. Chicago, IL: Community and Family Study Center.Google Scholar
  6. Bogue, D.J. (1969). Principles of demography. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Cattell, R.B. (1942). The concept of social status, Journal of Social Psychology 15: 293-308.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, R.E. (1948). The relationship of schizophrenia to occupational income and prestige, American Sociological Review 3: 325-330.Google Scholar
  9. Counts, G. (1925). The social status of occupations, The School Review 33: 16-27.Google Scholar
  10. Coutu, W. (1936). The relative prestige of 20 professors as judged by three groups of professional students, {tiSocial Forces} 14: 522-529.Google Scholar
  11. Cready, C.M., Fossett, M.A. & Kiecolt, K.J. (1997). Mate availability and African American family structure in the US nonmetropolitan South, 1960-1990, {tiJournal of Marriage and the Family} 59(1): 192-203.Google Scholar
  12. Deeg, M.E. & Patterson, D.G. (1947). Changes in social status of occupations, Occupations 25: 205-208.Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, O.D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations, pp. 109-138, in: A.J. Reiss, Jr. (ed.), {tiOccupations and social status}. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, A.M. (1917). Social-economic groups of the United States, Quarterly Journal of the American Statistical Association 15: 643-644.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, A.M. (1933). A social-economic grouping of the gainful workers of the United States, {tiJournal of the American Statistical Association} 28: 378.Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, A.M. (1943). Comparative occupation statistics for the United States, 1870- 1940. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  17. Gales, J. (1834). Annals of Congress: Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Gales and Seaton.Google Scholar
  18. Hartman, G.W. (1934). The prestige of occupations, Personnel Journal 13: 144-152.Google Scholar
  19. Hauser, R.M. & Warren, J.R. (1997). Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: a review, update, and critique, Sociological Methodology 27(1): 177-298.Google Scholar
  20. Hearth-Holmes, M., Murphy, P.W., Davis, T.C., Nandy, I., Elder, C.G., Broadwell, L.H. & Wolf, R.E. (1997). Literacy in patients with a chronic disease: Systemic Lupus erythematosus and the reading level of patient education materials, Journal of Rheumatology 24(12): 2335-2339.Google Scholar
  21. Herman, D.B., Susser, E.S., Struening, E.L. & Susser, E.S. (1997). Adverse childhood experiences: are they risk factors for adult homelessness? American Journal of Public Health 87(2): 249-255.Google Scholar
  22. Hollingshead, A.B. (1949). Elmtown’s youth. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Hummer, R.A., Rogers, R.G. & Eberstein, I.W. (1998). Sociodemographic differentials in adult mortality: a review of analytic approaches, Population and Development Review 24(3): 553-578.Google Scholar
  24. Hunt, W.C. (1897). Workers at gainful occupations at the federal censuses of 1870, 1880, and 1890, Bulletin of the Department of Labor 11: 415.Google Scholar
  25. Koessel, S.L., Theis, M.K., Vaughan, T.L., Koepsell, T.D., Weiss, N.S., Greenberg, R.S. & Swanson, G.M. (1996). Socioeconomic status and the incidence of multiple Myeloma, Epidemiology 7(1): 4-8.Google Scholar
  26. Lehman, H.C. & Witty, P.A. (1931). Further study of the social status of occupations, Journal of Educational Sociology 5: 101-112.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, D.C. & Salkind, N.J. (2002). Handbook of research design and social measurement. 6th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Nakao, K. & Treas, J. (1994). Updating occupational prestige and socioeconomic scores: how the new measures measure up, pp. 1-72, in: P. Marsden (ed.), Sociological methodology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  29. Nam, C.B. (2000). Comparison of three occupational scales. Unpublished paper. Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University.Google Scholar
  30. Nam, C.B., LaRocque, J., Powers, M.G. & Holmberg, J. (1975). Occupational status scores: stability and change, pp. 570-575, in: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  31. Nam, C.B. & Powers, M.G. (1968). Changes in the relative status of workers in the United States, 1950-1960, Social Forces 47: 158-170.Google Scholar
  32. Nam, C.B. & Powers, M.G. (1983). The socioeconomic approach to status measurement. Houston, TX: Cap and Gown Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nam, C.B. & Terrie, E.W. (1988). 1980-based Nam-Powers occupational status scores. Working Paper 88-48. Tallahassee, FL: Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University.Google Scholar
  34. Nietz, J.A. (1935). The Depression and the social status of occupations, Elementary School Journal 35: 454-461.Google Scholar
  35. North, C.C. & Hatt, P.K. (1949). Jobs and occupations: A popular evaluation, Opinion News 9: 3-13.Google Scholar
  36. Osgood, C.E. & Stegner, R. (1941). Analysis of the prestige frame of reference by a gradient technique, Journal of Applied Psychology 25: 275-290.Google Scholar
  37. Padover, S.K. (1943). The complete Jefferson. New York, NY: Duell, Sloan & Pearce.Google Scholar
  38. Powers, M.G. & Seltzer, W. (1998). Occupational status and mobility among undocumented immigrants by gender, International Migration Review 32(1): 21-55.Google Scholar
  39. Powers, M.G., Seltzer, W. & Shi, J. (1998). Gender differences in the occupational status of undocumented immigrants in the United States: Experience before and after legalization, International Migration Review 32(4): 1015-1046.Google Scholar
  40. Rossiter, W.S. (1909). A century of population growth: From the first census of the United States to the twelfth 1790-1900. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  41. Scoville, J.G. (1972). Manpower and occupational analysis: Concepts and measurement. Part 1. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  42. Seibert, M.T., Fossett, M.A., & Baunach, D.M. (1997). Trends in male-female status inequality, 1940-1990, Social Science Research 26(1): 1-24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Siegel, P.M. (1971). Prestige in the American occupational structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, M. (1935). Proposal for making a scale of occupational status, Sociology and Social Research 20: 40-49.Google Scholar
  45. Stevens, G. & Cho, J.H. (1985). Socioeconomic indexes and the new 1980 census occupational scheme, Social Science Research 14: 142-168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stevens, G. & Featherman, D.L. (1981). A revised socioeconomic index of occupational status, Social Science Research 10: 364-395.Google Scholar
  47. Steenland, K., Halperin, W., Hu, S. & Walker, J.T. (2003). Deaths due to injuries among employed adults: the effects of socioeconomic class, Epidemiology 14(1): 74-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Terrie, E.W. & Nam, C.B. (1994). 1990 and 1980 Nam-Powers-Terrie occupational status scores. Working paper 94–118. Tallahassee, FL: Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University.Google Scholar
  49. US Bureau of the Census. (1963). Methodology and scores of socioeconomic status. Working Paper no. 15. Washington, D.C.: US Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  50. US Census Bureau. (2000). Design and methodology. Current Population Survey, Technical Paper 63, TP63. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. Available from <www.census.gov/prod/2000pubs/tp63.pdf>.Google Scholar
  51. US Census Bureau. (2002). Statistical abstract of the United States, 2001. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. Available from <www.census.gov/prod/2002pub/01statab/labor.pdf>.Google Scholar
  52. Volinn, E., Van Koevering, D. & Loeser, J.D. (1991). Back sprain in industry: the role of socioeconomic-factors in chronicity, Spine 16(5): 542-548.Google Scholar
  53. Warner, W.L., Meeker, M. & Eels, K. (1949). Social Class in America: The Evaluation of Status. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
  54. Wilkinson, F. (1929). Social distance between occupations, Sociology and Social Research 13: 234-244.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles B. Nam
    • 1
  • Monica Boyd
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Demography and Population HealthFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of TorontoToronto, Ont.Canada

Personalised recommendations