Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 399–418 | Cite as

Micropolitan Areas and the Measurement of American Urbanization

  • David L. Brown
  • John B. Cromartie
  • Laszlo J. Kulcsar
Article

Abstract

With the official designation of micropolitan areas in June 2003, as part of the new core-based statistical area system, non-metropolitan territory is no longer an undifferentiated residual. In this paper we compare the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of a preliminary set of micropolitan areas with more highly urbanized territory and with territory outside core-based statistical areas, to answer questions about the micropolitan category's conceptual validity. Demographic and economic data are used, along with a mail survey of county officials in a random sample of small metropolitan, micropolitan, and non-core-based statistical areas (non-CBSAs). The analysis shows substantial differentiation between micropolitan and non-CBSA areas, and demonstrates the importance of distinguishing between these two types of non-metropolitan areas. As an intermediate category, micropolitan areas provide stability to the decade-to-decade swings in non-metropolitan population change during periods of higher out-migration, but share almost equally with non-CBSA areas in attracting migrants during periods of high non-metropolitan in-migration. In terms of services available and their function as urban centers, micropolitan areas are intermediate between small metropolitan and non-CBSA areas, but more similar to small metropolitan areas.

Metropolitan Micropolitan Non-metropolitan turnaround Rural rebound Urbanization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beale, C. (1984). Poughkeepsie’s complaint or defining metropolitan areas, American Demographics 6: 28-31, 46-48.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, B. (1967). The geography of market centers and retail distribution. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, D.L. & Cromartie, J.B. (2003). The nature of rurality in postindustrial society, pp. 269-284, in: T. Champion & G. Hugo (eds.), New forms of urbanization: Beyond the rural-urban dichotomy. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, D.L. (1979). Metropolitan reclassification: Some effects on the characteristics of the population in metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties. Rural Sociology 44 (4): 791-801.Google Scholar
  5. Cromartie, J.B. (2003). Measuring rurality: What is rural? Briefing room. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Available from <http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/Rurality/WhatisRural/> [August 20, 2003].Google Scholar
  6. Dahmann, D. & Fitzsimmons, J. (eds.) (1995). Metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas: New approaches to geographical definition. Working paper No. 12. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division.Google Scholar
  7. Duncan, O., Scott, W., Lieberson, S., Duncan, B. & Winsborough, H. (1960). Metropolis and region. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  8. Fuguitt, G., Brown, D.L. & Beale, C. (1989). Rural and small town America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Fuguitt, G., Heaton, T. & Lichter, D. (1988). Monitoring the metropolitanization process, Demography 25(1): 115-128.Google Scholar
  10. Gras, N. (1922a). An introduction to economic history. New York: Harper Brothers.Google Scholar
  11. Gras, N. (1922b). The development of metropolitan economy in Europe and America, American Historical Review 27: 695-708.Google Scholar
  12. Hawley, A. (1971, revised 1981). Urban society: An ecological approach. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hines, F., Brown, D. & Zimmer, J. (1975). The social and economic characteristics of the population in metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties, Agricultural Economics Report No. 272. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, J. (1984). Cities and the wealth of nations. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, K.M. & Fuguitt, G.V. (2000). Continuity and change in rural migration patterns, 1950-1995, Rural Sociology 65(1): 27-49.Google Scholar
  16. Ledebur, L. & Barnes, W. (1993). All in it together. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.Google Scholar
  17. Morrill, R., Cromartie, J. & Hart, G. (1999). Metropolitan, urban, and rural commuting areas: Toward a better depiction of the United States settlement system, Urban Geography 20(8): 727-748.Google Scholar
  18. Plane, D.A. & Henrie, C. (2002). Migration across the micropolitan/metropolitan spectrum, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Regional Science Association, Monterrey, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Rayer, S. & Brown, D.L. (2002). The demographic dimension of core-periphery linkages, Presented to the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  20. Sasson, S. (1994). Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  21. Savitch, H., Collins, D., Sanders, D. & Markham, J. (1992). Ties that bind: Central cities, suburbs, and the new metropolitan region, Economic Development Quarterly7: 341-357.Google Scholar
  22. Schnore, L. (1965). The urban scene. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Tilly, C. (1974). Urbanization, pp. 37-54, in: C. Tilly (ed.), Urban world. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  24. Tilly, C. (1994). Entanglements of European cities and states, pp. 1-27, in: C. Tilly & W. Blockmans (eds.), Cities and the rise of states in Europe, A.D. 1000 to 1800. Boulder CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. Census Bureau (1913). Thirteenth census of the United States. Vol. 1, Population 1910: General report and analysis. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  26. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2000). Standards for defining metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas, Federal Register 56(249): 82228-82238. Available from <http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/metroareas122700.pdf>.Google Scholar
  27. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2003). Revised Definitions of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, New Definitions of Micropolitan Statistical Areas and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of the Statistical Definitions of These Areas. OMB Bulletin 03-04. Available from <http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/bulletins/b03-04.html>.Google Scholar
  28. Vias, A., Mulligan, G. & Molin, A. (2002). Economic structure and socioeconomic change in America’s micropolitan areas, 1970-1997, Social Science Journal 32: 399- 417.Google Scholar
  29. Voith, R. (1992). City and suburban growth: Substitutes or complements? Business Review. Federal Reserve Bank: Philadelphia: 21-31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Brown
    • 1
  • John B. Cromartie
    • 2
  • Laszlo J. Kulcsar
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Development SociologyIthacaUSA Phone: +
  2. 2.Economic Research ServiceU.S. Department of Agriculture
  3. 3.Department of Development SociologyCornell UniversityIthacaU.S.A

Personalised recommendations