Population and Environment

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 77–108 | Cite as

Neighborhood Social Change and Perceptions of Environmental Degradation

  • Jennifer S. Barber
  • Ann E. Biddlecom
  • William G. Axinn
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates how changes in neighborhood facilities—new schools, health posts, bus services, mills, dairies, agricultural cooperatives, and other facilities—influence perceptions of environmental degradation. We use three types of data from a rural area in Nepal: (1) data on changing neighborhood facilities from 171 neighborhoods, collected using ethnographic, survey, and archival methods; (2) survey data on household characteristics and environmental perceptions from 1,651 households; and (3) individual-level survey data. We find that new neighborhood facilities are associated with perceptions of environmental degradation. This is important because perceptions may indicate objective environmental degradation, encourage participation in programs to improve the environmental, and influence environmental behavior.

social change environmental degradation perceptions Nepal neighborhood 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acharya, M., & Bennett, L. (1981). The Status of Women in Nepal: The Rural Women of Nepal. Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, B. (1992). The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India. Feminist Studies, 18(1), 119–158.Google Scholar
  3. Agarwal, B. (1997). Gender, environment, and poverty interlinks: Regional variations and temporal shifts in rural India, 1971–91. World Development, 25(1), 23–52.Google Scholar
  4. Axinn, N. W., & Axinn, G. H. (1983). Small farmers in Nepal: A farming systems approach to description. Kathmandu, Nepal: Rural Life Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Axinn, W. G., & Barber, J. S. (2001). Mass education and fertility limitation. American Sociological Review, 66, 481–505.Google Scholar
  6. Axinn, W. G., Barber, J. S., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2000). Social change, family size, and environmental consumption. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, San Francisco, March 23–25.Google Scholar
  7. Axinn, W. G., Barber, J. S., & Ghimire, D. J. (1997). The neighborhood history calendar: A data collection method designed for dynamic multilevel modeling. Sociological Methodology, 27, 355–92.Google Scholar
  8. Axinn, W. G., & Yabiku, S. T. (2001). Social change, the social organization of families, and fertility limitation. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1219–1261.Google Scholar
  9. Barber, J. S. (in press). Communities and attitudes: The influence of nonfamily institutions and experiences on dispositions toward marriage. Social Psychology Quarterly.Google Scholar
  10. Barber, J. S., Pearce, L. D., Chaudhury, I., & Gurung, S. (2002). Voluntary associations and fertility limitation. Social Forces, 80(4), 1369–1401.Google Scholar
  11. Baydar, N., White, M. J., Simkins, C., & Babakol, O. (1990). Effects of agricultural development policies on migration in peninsular Malaysia. Demography, 27(1), 97–109.Google Scholar
  12. Bennet, L. (1983). Dangerous Wives and Sacred Sisters. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bilsborrow, R. F., & DeLargy, P. F. (1990). Land use, migration, and natural resource deterioration: The experience of Guatemala and the Sudan. In K. Davis & M. Bernstam (Eds.), Resources, Environment, and Population (pp. 125–147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bongaarts, J. (1996). Population pressure and the food supply system in the developing world. Population and Development Review, 22(3), 483–503.Google Scholar
  15. Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, Greg J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99, 353–395.Google Scholar
  16. Chaudhary, R. P. (1998). Biodiversity in Nepal: Status and conservation. Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India: S. Devi.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. (1995). How many people can the Earth support? New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Dang, A., Goldstein, S., & McNally, J. (1997). Internal migration and development in Vietnam. International Migration Review, 31(2), 312–337.Google Scholar
  19. Daniere, A. G., & Takahashi, L. M. (1999). Environmental behavior in Bangkok, Thailand: A portrait of attitudes, values, and behaviors. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(3), 525–557.Google Scholar
  20. Eckholm, E. (1976). Losing ground: Environmental stress and world food prospects. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Ehrlich, P., Ehrlich, A., & Daily, G. (1993). Food security, population, and environment. Population and Development Review, 19(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
  22. Entwisle, B., Casterline, J.B., & Sayed, H.A. (1989). Villages as contexts for contraceptive behavior in rural Egypt. American Sociological Review, 54, 1019–1034.Google Scholar
  23. Entwisle, B., & Mason W. (1985). Multilevel affects of socioeconomic development and family planning programs on children ever born. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 616–649.Google Scholar
  24. Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx's theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 366–405.Google Scholar
  25. Fricke, Tom. (1986). Himalayan households: Tamang demography and domestic processes. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gellner, D. N., & Quigley, D. (Eds). (1995). Contested hieararchies: A collaborative ethnography of caste among the Newars of the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Guneratne, U. A. (1994). The Tharus of Chitwan: Ethnicity, class and the state in Nepal. Unpublished dissertation. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Gurung, S. B. (1998). The land and the people. In P. Shumshere, J. B. Rana, & D. N. Dhungel (Eds.), Contemporary Nepal (pp. 1–13). New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Hart, G., Turton, A., & White, B., withFegan, B., & Ghee, L.T. (Eds.). (1989). Agrarian transformations: Local processes and the state in southeast Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Heilig, G. K. (1997). Anthropogenic factors in land-use change in China. Population and Development Review, 23(1), 139–168.Google Scholar
  31. Huber, J. (Ed.). (1991). Macro-Micro linkages in sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Joshi, N. N., Jali, N. M., & Hamid, A.H. (1997). Organized structure, performance, and participation: Forest user groups in the Nepal hills. In G. Shivakoti, G. Varughese, E. Ostrom, A. Shukla, & G. Thapa (Eds.), People and participation in sustainable development: Understanding the dynamics of natural resource systems (pp. 55–63). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, P. (1992). Migration and development. International Migration Review, 26(3), 1000–1012.Google Scholar
  34. Marx, K. ([1867] 1976). Capital: A critique of political economy, (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  35. Marx, K. ([1863–65] 1981). Capital: A critique of political economy, (Vol. 3). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  36. Massey, D. S., & Espinoza, K. E. (1997). What's driving Mexico-U.S. migration? A theoretical, empirical, and policy analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 939–999.Google Scholar
  37. Myers, N. (1988). Threatened biotas: “Hot spots” in tropical forests. Environmentalist, 8, 187–208.Google Scholar
  38. Myers, N. (1991). The world's forests and human populations: The environmental interconnections. In K. Davis & M. Bernstam (Eds.), Resources, environment, and population (pp. 237–251). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. National Research Council. (1993). Population and land use in developing countries. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ogburn, W. F., & Nimkoff, M.F. ([1955] 1976). Technology and the changing family. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pitt, M. M., Khandker, S.R., McKernan, S., & Latif, M.A. (1999). Credit programs for the poor and reproductive behavior in low-income countries: Are the reported causal relationships the result of heterogeneity bias? Demography, 36, 1–21.Google Scholar
  42. Pitt, M. M., Rosenzweig, M.R., & Gibbons, D. M. (1993). The determinants and consequences of the placement of government programs in Indonesia. World Bank Economic Review, 7, 319–348.Google Scholar
  43. Pokharel, B. N., & Shivakoti, G.P. (1986). Impact of development efforts on agricultural wage labor. Winrock Rural Poverty Research Paper Series, No. 1.Google Scholar
  44. Raudenbush, S. W. (1988). Educational applications of hierarchical linear models: A review. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13, 85–116.Google Scholar
  45. Rees, W. (1996). Revisiting carrying capacity: Area-based indicators of sustainability. Population and Environment, 17(3), 195–215.Google Scholar
  46. Rountree, P. W., Land, K. C., & Miethe, T.D. (1994). Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: A hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle neighborhoods. Criminology, 32, 387–413.Google Scholar
  47. Shivakoti, G. P., Axinn, W.G., Bhandari, P., & Chhetri, N. (1999). The impact of community context on land use in an agricultural society. Population and Environment, 20(3), 191–213.Google Scholar
  48. Shivakoti, G. P., & Pokharel, B.N. (1989). Marketing of major crops in Chitwan: A case study of six village panchayats. Winrock Research Paper Series No. 8.Google Scholar
  49. Shukla, A. K., Shivakoti, G., Benjamin, P., & Ostrom, E. (1997). Reflections on irrigation policies in Nepal. In G. Shivakoti, G. Varughese, E. Ostrom, A. Shukla, & G. Thapa (Eds.), People and participation in sustainable development: Understanding the dynamics of natural resource systems (pp. 276–289). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  50. Thapa, G. (1997). Indigenous management of Nepal's natural resources: Some policy issues. In G. Shivakoti, G. Varughese, E. Ostrom, A. Shukla, & G. Thapa (Eds.), People and participation in sustainable development: Understanding the dynamics of natural resource systems (pp. 290–298). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  51. Thornton, A., & Fricke, T.E. (1987). Social change and the family: Comparative perspectives from the West, China, and South Asia. Sociological Forum, 2(4), 746–772.Google Scholar
  52. Thornton, A., & Lin, H. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. United Nations. (1995). The world's women 1995: Trends and statistics. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  54. United Nations. (2000). The world's women 2000: Trends and statistics. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  55. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 redistricting data (PL 94–171) summary file. American Factfinder at factfinder.census.gov.Google Scholar
  56. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). The attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(monograph supplement no. 2), Page 2, 1–27.Google Scholar
  57. Zurick, D., & Karan, P. P. (1999). Himalaya: Life on the edge of the world. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer S. Barber
    • 1
  • Ann E. Biddlecom
    • 2
  • William G. Axinn
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  2. 2.University of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations