Political Behavior

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 201–225 | Cite as

Evaluating Measures of Campaign Advertising Exposure on Political Learning

  • Travis N. Ridout
  • Dhavan V. Shah
  • Kenneth M. Goldstein
  • Michael M. Franz


Scholars employ various methods to measure exposure to televised political advertising but often arrive at conflicting conclusions about its impact on the thoughts and actions of citizens. We attempt to clarify one of these debates while validating a parsimonious measure of political advertising exposure. To do so, we assess the predictive power of six different measurement approaches—from the simple to the complex—on learning about political candidates. Two datasets are used in this inquiry: (1) geo-coded political advertising time-buy data, and (2) a national panel study concerning patterns of media consumption and levels of political knowledge. We conclude that many traditional methods of assessing exposure are flawed. Fortunately, there is a relatively simple measure that predicts knowledge about information featured in ads. This measure involves combining a tally of the volume of advertisements aired in a market with a small number of survey questions about the television viewing habits of geo-coded respondents.

political advertising advertising exposure political learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto (1995). Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Atkin, Charles, and Heald, Gary (1976). Effects of political advertising. Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brians, Craig L., and Wattenberg, Martin P. (1996). Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science 40: 172–193.Google Scholar
  4. Chaffee, Steven H., Zhao, Xinshu, and Leshner, Glenn (1994). Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research 21: 305–324.Google Scholar
  5. Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eveland, William. P., Jr., Shah, Dhavan V., and Kwak, Nojin (2003). Assessing causality: a panel study of motivations, information processing and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research 30: 359–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finkel, Steven E., and Geer, John G. (1998). A spot check: casting doubt on the demobilizing effect of attack advertising. American Journal of Political Science 42: 573–595.Google Scholar
  8. Freedman, Paul, and Goldstein, Ken (1999). Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science 43: 1189–1208.Google Scholar
  9. Goldstein, Ken, and Freedman, Paul (2002a). Campaign advertising and voter turnout: new evidence for a stimulation effect. Journal of Politics 64: 721–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldstein, Ken, and Freedman, Paul (2002b). Lessons learned: campaign advertising in the 2000 elections. Political Communication 19: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Groeneman, Sid (1994). Multi-purpose household panels and general samples: how similar and how different? Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Danvers, Mass.Google Scholar
  12. Hagen, Michael, Johnston, Richard, and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall (2002). Effects of the 2000 presidential campaign. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Pete Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  13. Kaid, Lynda Lee, and Holtz-Bacha, Christine (1995). Political Advertising in Western Democracies: Parties and Candidates on Television. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. McClure, Robert D., and Patterson, Thomas E. (1974). Television news and political advertising. Communication Research 1: 3–31.Google Scholar
  15. Patterson, Thomas E., and McClure, Robert D. (1976). The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Elections. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
  16. Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Putnam, Robert D., and Yonish, Steve (1999). How important are random samples? Some surprising new evidence. Paper presented to the annual convention of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Pete Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  18. Sides, John (2001). What lies beneath: Campaign effects in the 1998 California governor's race. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  19. Thorson, Esther (1983). Propositional determinants of memory for television commercials. Current Issues and Research in Advertising 6: 139–155.Google Scholar
  20. Wattenberg, Martin P., and Brians, Craig Leonard (1999). Negative campaign advertising: demobilizer or mobilizer? American Political Science Review 93: 891–899.Google Scholar
  21. Weaver, David, and Drew, Dan (1995). Voter learning in the 1992 presidential election: did the ''nontraditional'' media and debates matter? Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 72: 7–17.Google Scholar
  22. West, Darrell M. (1994). Political advertising and news coverage in the 1992 California US Senate campaigns. Journal of Politics 56: 1053–1075.Google Scholar
  23. Zhao, Xinshu, and Bleske, Glen L. (1995). Measurement effects in comparing voter learning from television news and campaign advertisements. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 72: 72–83.Google Scholar
  24. Zhao, Xinshu, and Chaffee, Steven H. (1995). Campaign advertisements versus television news as sources of political issue information. Public Opinion Quarterly 59: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Travis N. Ridout
    • 1
  • Dhavan V. Shah
    • 2
  • Kenneth M. Goldstein
    • 3
  • Michael M. Franz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.School of Journalism and Mass CommunicationUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  3. 3.University of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations