Plant and Soil

, Volume 258, Issue 1, pp 319–331 | Cite as

Radiometric assessment of tillage and seed treatment effect on soybean root rot caused by Fusarium spp. in central Minnesota

  • D. Wang
  • J.E. Kurle
  • C. Estevez de Jensen
  • J.A. Percich


Soybean root rot, caused primarily by Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli in a complex with F. oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani, has become an increasing problem for soybeans, dry beans, and other rotation crops in central Minnesota due to soil conditions associated with reduced tillage. This study was conducted, in two field sites in central Minnesota located near Staples and Verndale, to develop methods for nondestructive assessment of root rot severity using plant radiometric properties. Soybean canopy reflectance was measured with a hand-held multi-spectral radiometer. Prior to the radiometer measurements, attempts were made to create differing root rot situations with moldboard or chisel tillage, and with or without a biological seed treatment. Root rot severity was estimated using a visual disease severity scale. Colony-forming units (CFU) were determined to estimate soil populations of pathogenic F. solani and F. oxysporum. Results from the Verndale site consistently showed significant treatment effects in the measured canopy radiometric parameters, and in the visual disease rating and yield (significant for seed treatment). Values of a simple ratio vegetation index from this site exhibited negative relationships with disease rating and F. oxysporum CFU, and a positive linear relationship with yield. Treatment effects were generally not significant at the Staples site because of low initial F. oxysporum populations. The results indicate that remote sensing is potentially a rapid, nondestructive means for assessment of root rot diseases in soybean.

Fusarium root rot F. solani F. oxysporum spectral reflectance vegetation index 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allmaras R R, Kraft J M and Miller D E 1988 Effects of soil compaction and incorporated crop residues in root health. In Annual Review of Phytopathology. pp. 219–243. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  2. Blakeman R H 1990 The identification of crop disease and stress by aerial photography. In Applications of Remote Sensing in Agriculture. Eds. M D Steven and J A Clark. pp. 229–254. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  3. Bockus W W and Shroyer J P 1998 The impact of reduced tillage on soil-borne plant pathogens. In Annual Review of Phytopathology. Ed. R K Webster. pp. 485–500. Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Burgess L W, Liddell C M and Summerell B A 1988 Laboratory Manual for Fusarium Research. 2nd ed. pp. 156. Univ. Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Curl E A and Truelove B 1986 The Rhizosphere. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Estevez de Jensen C, Percich J A and Graham P H 2002 Integrated management strategies of bean root rot with Bacillus subtilis and Rhizobium in Minnesota. Field Crops Res. 74, 107–115.Google Scholar
  7. Gaunt R E 1995 The relationship between plant disease and yield. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 33, 119–144.Google Scholar
  8. Gausman H W 1974 Leaf reflectance of near infrared. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 40, 57–62.Google Scholar
  9. Gill J S, Sivasithamparam K and Smettem K R J 2001 Soil types with different texture affects development of Rhizoctonia root rot of wheat seedlings. Plant Soil 221, 113–120.Google Scholar
  10. Gray L E and Achenbach L A 1996 Severity of foliar symptoms and root and crown rot of soybean inoculated with various isolates and inoculum rates of Fusarium solani. Plant Dis. 80, 1196–1199.Google Scholar
  11. Green D E, II., Burpee L L and Stevenson K L 1998 Canopy reflectance as a measure of disease in tall fescue. Crop Sci. 38, 1603–1613.Google Scholar
  12. Green S and Clothier B 1998 The root zone dynamics of water uptake by a mature apple tree. Plant Soil 206, 61–77.Google Scholar
  13. Guyot G 1990 Optical properties of plant canopies. In Applications of Remote Sensing in Agriculture. Eds. M D Steven and J A Clark. pp. 19–43. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  14. Hatfield J L and Pinter P J, Jr. 1993 Remote sensing for crop protection. Crop Protection 12, 403–414.Google Scholar
  15. Hwang S F, Howard R J, Chang K F, Park B and Burnett P A 1994 Etiology and severity of Fusarium root rot of lentil in Alberta. Can. J. Plant. Pathol. 16, 295–303.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson R D 1986 Remote sensing of biotic and abiotic plant stress. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 24, 265–287.Google Scholar
  17. Juzwik J, Gust K M and Allmaras R R 1999 Influence of cultural practices on edaphic factors related to root disease in Pinus nursery seedlings. Plant Soil 207, 195–208.Google Scholar
  18. Kollenkark J C, Daughtry C S T, Bauer M E and Housley T L 1982 Effects of cultural practices on agronomic and reflectance characteristics of soybean canopies. Agron. J. 74, 751–758.Google Scholar
  19. Kraft J M and Boge W 2001 Root characteristics in pea in relation to compaction and Fusarium root rot. Plant Dis. 85, 936–940.Google Scholar
  20. Lyda S D 1981 Alleviating pathogen stress. In Modifying the Root Environment to Reduce Crop Stress. Eds. G F Arkin and H M Taylor. pp. 195–214. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
  21. Markwell J, Osterman J C and Mitchell J L 1995 Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynthetic Res. 46, 467–472.Google Scholar
  22. McConnell J T, Miller P R, Lawrence R L, Engel R and Nielsen G A 2002 Managing inoculation failures of field pea and chickpea based on spectral responses. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82, 273–282.Google Scholar
  23. Merriman P R, Price R D, Baker K F, Kollmorgan J F, Piggott T and Ridge E H 1975 Effect of Bacillus and Streptomyces spp. applied to seed. In Biology and Control of Soil-borne Plant Pathogens. Ed. G W Bruehl. pp. 130–133. Am. Phytopathological Soc., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  24. Nelson B D, Hansen J M, Windels C M and Helms T C 1997 Reaction of soybean cultivars to isolates of Fusarium solani from the Red River Valley. Plant Dis. 81, 664–668.Google Scholar
  25. Nelson P E, Toussoun T A and Marasas W F O 1983 Fusarium species. In An Illustrated Manual for Identification. pp. 190. The Pennsylvania State Univ. Press., Univ. Park, PA.Google Scholar
  26. Nilsson H E 1991 Hand-held radiometry and IR-thermography of plant diseases in field plot experiments. Int. J. Remote Sens. 12, 545–557.Google Scholar
  27. Nutter F W Jr. and Littrell R H 1996 Relationships between defoliation, canopy reflectance and pod yield in the peanut-late leafspot pathosystem. Crop Protection 15, 135–142.Google Scholar
  28. Orcutt D M and Nilsen E T 1996 Physiology of plants under stress: Soil and biotic factors. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  29. Pang X P 1995 Field and computer modeling studies on soil hydrology in the central sands of Minnesota: percolation probabilities, risk assessment of nitrate leaching, and percolation losses from drip vs. sprinkler irrigation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  30. Parker S R, Shaw M W and Royle D J 1995 The reliability of visual estimates of disease severity on cereal leaves. Plant Pathol. 44, 856–864.Google Scholar
  31. Pierce F J and Warncke D D 2000 Soil and crop response to variable-rate liming for two Michigan fields. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 774–780.Google Scholar
  32. Robert P C 2002 Precision agriculture: a challenge for crop nutrition management. Plant Soil 247, 143–149.Google Scholar
  33. Roy K W, Patel M V and Baird R E 2000 Colonization of Hetrodera glycines cysts by Fusarium solani form A, the cause of sudden death syndrome, and other fusaria in soybean fields in the midwestern and southern United States. Phytoprotection 81, 57–67.Google Scholar
  34. Schoonhoven A van and Pastor Corrales M 1987 Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm. In International Center of Tropical Agriculture. p. 53. Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
  35. Siddiqui I A, Ehetshamul-Haque S and Shaukat S S 2001 Use of rhizobacteria in the control of root rot-root knot disease complex of mungbean. J. Phytopathol. 149, 337–346.Google Scholar
  36. Smith A L, Bengough A G, Engels C, van Noordwijk M, Pellerin S and van de Geijn S C 2000 Root methods: A Handbook. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Takebe M, Yoneyama T, Inada K and Murakami T 1990 Spectral reflectance ratio of rice canopy for estimating crop nitrogen status. Plant Soil 122, 295–297.Google Scholar
  38. Thompson J A, Schweitzer L E and Nelson R L 1996 Association of specific leaf weight, an estimate of chlorophyll, and chlorophyll concentration with apparent photosynthesis in soybean. Photosynthetic Res. 49, 1–10.Google Scholar
  39. Wang D, Wilson C and Shannon M C 2002 Interpretation of salinity and irrigation effects on soybean canopy reflectance in visible and near-infrared spectrum domain. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23, 811–824.Google Scholar
  40. Wiegand C L, Richardson A J, Escobar D E and Gerbermann A H 1991 Vegetation indices in crop assessments. Remote Sens. Environ. 35, 105–119.Google Scholar
  41. Williams-Woodward J L, Pfleger F L, Fritz V A and Allmaras R R 1997 Green manures of oat, rape and sweet corn for reducing common root rot in pea (Pisum sativum) caused by Aphanomyces euteiches. Plant Soil 188, 43–48.Google Scholar
  42. Windels C 1993 Fusarium. In Methods for Research on Soilborne Phytopathogenic Fungi. 2nd Ed., Eds. L L Singleton, J D Mahail and C M Rush. pp. 115–128. Am. Phytopathological Soc., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Wang
    • 1
  • J.E. Kurle
    • 2
  • C. Estevez de Jensen
    • 2
  • J.A. Percich
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Soil, Water, and ClimateUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations