Philosophical Studies

, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp 215–269 | Cite as

Defending a Possible-Worlds Account of Indicative Conditionals

  • Daniel Nolan

Abstract

One very popular kind of semantics for subjunctive conditionals is aclosest-worlds account along the lines of theories given by David Lewisand Robert Stalnaker. If we could give the same sort of semantics forindicative conditionals, we would have a more unified account of themeaning of ``if ... then ...'' statements, one with manyadvantages for explaining the behaviour of conditional sentences. Such atreatment of indicative conditionals, however, has faced a battery ofobjections. This paper outlines a closest-worlds account of indicativeconditionals that does better than some of its cousins in explaining thebehaviour of such conditionals. The paper then discusses objectionsoffered by Dorothy Edgington and Frank Jackson to closest-worldsaccounts of indicative conditionals, and shows that these objections canbe met by the account outlined.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adams, E.W. (1975): The Logic of Conditionals, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  2. Davis, W.A. (1979): ‘Indicative and Subjunctive Conditionals’, Philosophical Review 88(4), 544–564.Google Scholar
  3. Edgington, D. (1986):‘Do Conditionals Have Truth-Conditions?’, Critica 18(52), 3–30. Reprinted in Jackson, 1991, pp. 176–201. Page numbers given are for the Jackson collection.Google Scholar
  4. Edgington, D. (1995):‘On Conditionals’, Mind 104(414), 235–329.Google Scholar
  5. Ells, E. and Skyrms, B. (eds.) (1994): Probability and Conditionals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gibbard, A. (1980):‘Two Recent Theories of Conditionals’, in W. Harper, R. Stalnaker and G. Pearce (eds.), Ifs (pp. 211–247), Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  7. Grice, H.P. (1975):‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hajek, A. (1994):‘Triviality on the Cheap?’, in E. Ells and B. Skyrms (eds.), Probability and Conditionals (pp. 113–139),Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hajek, A. and Hall, N. (1994):‘The Hypothesis of the Conditional Construal of Conditional Probability’, in E. Ells and B. Skyrms (eds.), Probability and Conditionals (pp. 75–112), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jackson, F. (1987): Conditionals, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Jackson, F. (ed.) (1991): Conditionals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kripke, S. (1980): Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, D.K. (1973): Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, D.K. (1976):‘Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities’, Philosophical Review 85, 297–315. Reprinted in Lewis 1986a.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, D.K. (1986a): Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, D.K. (1986b):‘Postscript to Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities’, in D.K. Lewis (ed.), Philosophical Papers, vol. 2 (pp. 152–156), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, D.K. (1996):‘Elusive Knowledge’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74(4), 549–567.Google Scholar
  18. Lycan, W.G. (2001): Real Conditionals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. McGee, Vann. (1985):‘A Counterexample to Modus Ponens’, Journal of Philosophy 82, 462–471.Google Scholar
  20. Nolan, D. (1997):‘ImpossibleWorlds: AModestApproach’,Notre Dame Journal for Formal Logic 38(4), 535–572.Google Scholar
  21. Stalnaker, R. (1968):‘A Theory of Conditionals’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, no.2 (pp. 98–112), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Stalnaker, R. (1975):‘Indicative Conditionals’, Philosophia 5, 269–286. Reprinted in Jackson, 1991, pp. 136–154. Page numbers given are for the Jackson collection.Google Scholar
  23. Stalnaker R. and Thomason, R. (1968):‘A Semantic Analysis of Conditional Logic’, Theoria 36, 23–42.Google Scholar
  24. Van Frassen, B. (1976):‘Probabilities of Conditionals’, in W.L. Harper and C.A. Hooker (eds.), Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, Vol 1 (pp. 261–308), Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  25. Weatherson, Brian (2001):‘Indicatives and Subjunctives’, Philosophical Quarterly 51, 200–216.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Nolan
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA, E-mail

Personalised recommendations