Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 197–202 | Cite as

Needs and use of drug information sources in community pharmacies: a questionnaire based survey in German-speaking Switzerland

  • Simon ZehnderEmail author
  • Marianne Beutler
  • Rudolf Bruppacher
  • Thomas Ehrenhöfer
  • Kurt E. Hersberger
Article

Abstract

Methods: Postal survey to a random sample of 223 (26% out of 859) community pharmacies from the German-speaking part of Switzerland. The 48-item questionnaires were processed automatically with the Cardiff TELEform®-Software. In addition, a telephone-survey to a random sample of 20 non-responders was performed in order to test for non-response bias.

Results: A total of 108 pharmacists (response rate 48%) reported that the official Swiss drug reference book is still the most popular source of drug information used to solve all kinds of drug related problems. The Internet as a source of drug information is of minor importance, even though 88% of the pharmacies have Internet access. Deficits in drug information were reported for paediatrics, phytotherapy, drugs during pregnancy/lactation and for therapy guidelines. According to 35% of the pharmacists, the importance of offering drug information to customers will increase in the future. Most of the pharmacists are not afraid that Internet pharmacies would replace them.

Conclusions: The results show that the majority of the community pharmacists are only partially satisfied with the sources of drug information currently available. The Internet still plays a minor role for solving drug-related problems in daily practice, even though the available infrastructure makes the community pharmacies able to use the Internet more frequently. The pharmacists need more websites tailored to their needs. The pharmacists have clear visions about possible future developments. They do, however, have to adopt quickly to the changes ahead in order to remain competitive.

Community pharmacy Drug information Future developments Information use Information need Internet Questionnaire Survey Switzerland 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schweizerischer Apothekerverband. Berufsbild Offizinapotheker. [Occupational image of community pharmacists.] 3 April 2001. http://www.pharmagate.ch (9 June 2001).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brentano M, Schips B. System zur Honorierung der Apothekerleistungen. [Fee for service system for pharmacists.] Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, 2001. 201Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zehnder S, Hersberger K, Beutler M, Bruppacher R. Was denken Experten? [What do experts think?] Schweiz Apoth Ztg 2001; 139 (11): 372–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zehnder S, Beutler M, Bruppacher R, Hersberger K. Survey on developments of information technologies in medicine and their influence on pharmacy practice in German speaking Switzerland. Proceedings of the 30th European Symposium on Clinical Pharmacy, October 10-13 2001; Antwerp, Belgium. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stergachis A, Maine L, Brown L. The 2001 national pharmacy consumer survey. J Am Pharm Assoc 2002; 42 (4): 568–76.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ruppanner H. Das Informationsverhalten über Arzneimittel von Ärzten und Apothekern. [Use of drug information by physicians and pharmacists.] Dissertation. Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie. Bern, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loza Garcia M, Cordero Puentes L, Fernandez-Llimos F, Garcia Corral P et al. Drug information sources used by communtiy pharmacists in Galicia. Pharm Care Esp 2000; 2: 108–22.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan T, Lee K, Critchley J. The needs and sources of drug information among pharmacists in Hong Kong. J Clin Pharm Ther 1996; 21(5): 325–30.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iguchi S, Ohnishi M, Nishiyama T et al. Community pharmacy practice in Japan-results of a survey. J Clin Pharm Ther 1998; 23 (3): 223–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beutler M. Evidence-based medicine. Pharmactuel 2000; 11 (5): 1–26.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kamber M. Rückblende nach einem Jahrzehnt. [Looking back after a decade.] Schweiz Apoth Ztg 2001; 139 (20): 663–5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weinzierl S. Praxis der Arzneimittelinformationen. [Practice of drug information.] Eschborn: Govi-Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schulz M, Verheyen F, Muhlig S et al. Pharmaceutical care services for asthma patients: a controlled intervention study. J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 41: 668–76.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cordina M, Mc Elnay J, Hughes C. Assessment of a community pharmacy-based program for patients with asthma. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21(10): 1196–203.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sommerhalder M, Ruetz C. Ein Erfolg. [A success.] Schweiz Apoth Ztg 2003; 141(2): 68–77.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morant J. Arzneimittelkompendium der Schweiz. [Swiss drug reference book.] 23rd ed. Basel: Documed AG; 2002.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poirier T, Ascione F. Printed drug information sources used by pharmacists in southeastern Michigan. Am J Hosp Pharm 1980; 37(5): 687–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    EURO-JICs. Pan European Internet Surveys 2000. http://www. ejic.org/main.html (7 May 2001).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koller M, Grütter R, Peltenburg M et al. Use of the Internet by medical doctors in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 2001; 131 (17/ 18): 251-4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buisson J. Laying the foundations for a pharmacy e-commerce business. Pharm J 2000; 265: 880.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schweizer Apothekerverband (SAV). Neuer Fachtitel FPH in Offizin-und Spitalpharmazie. [A new specially certification in community and hospital pharmacy.] http://www.pharmagate.ch/ data/temp/Pressemitteilung_FPH_D.pdf (17 December 2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Zehnder
    • 1
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marianne Beutler
    • 2
  • Rudolf Bruppacher
    • 1
  • Thomas Ehrenhöfer
    • 1
  • Kurt E. Hersberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, PharmacenterUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Medicines Commission of Swiss Pharmacists (AKA)EggSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations