Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 173–177 | Cite as

Continuing education and community pharmacists in Galicia: a study of opinions

  • Luis Cordero
  • M. Isabel Cadavid
  • Fernando Fernández-Llimós
  • Carlos Díaz
  • Ferran Sanz
  • Maria Isabel Loza


Aim of the study: To determine the opinions of a volunteer group of community pharmacists concerning general and specific issues related to continuing education.

Methods: Participants were required to complete questionnaires before and after attendance at a refresher course, and score the relevant options provided on a scale from 0 to 10. The responses of the survey were analyzed to identify preferences and to detect any possible changes in opinion.

Main outcome measure: Arithmetic means of pharmacists' opinions.

Results: The teaching methods preferred by the community pharmacists were workshops for resolution of practical cases (9 ± 0.25 and 8.88 ± 0.13) and the distance-learning computer programmes (6.74 ± 0.25 and 8.18 ± 0.20). In selecting which topics that should be taught, the participants gave the highest ratings to healthcare needs (8.75 ± 0.14 and 8.57 ± 0.15) and the demands of the pharmacists (8.15 ± 0.16 and 8.40 ± 0.16), with pharmaceutical care being the most requested topic (29 points). Participants preferred courses lasting 20 to 50 hours (6.94 ± 0.26 and 7.89 ± 0.16), without preference for schedule.

Conclusion: Community pharmacists in Galicia show a great interest in the provision and organization of continuing education activities that meet their needs and expectations.

Community pharmacy Continuing pharmacy education Educational models Educational technology Spain Survey 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ACCP White Paper. Pharmaceutical Education. A commentary from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Pharmacotherapy 1992; 12: 419–27.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization. The role of the pharmacists in self-care and in self-medication. Report of a 4th WHO Consultative Group on the Role of the Pharmacists, The Hague, The Netherlands, 26–28 August 1998. Geneva: World Health Organization 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Code of ethics for pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1996; 53: 1805.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Pharmaceutical Federation. FIP Statement of Professional Standards. Code of Ethics for Pharmacists. FIP Council Meeting, Vancouver, September 1997. The Hague, The Netherlands: International Pharmaceutical Federation, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanson AL, DeMuth JE. Facilitators and barriers to pharmacists' participation in lifelong learning. Am J Pharm Educ 1991; 55: 20–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Richards W, Blank JW. Need analysis of practicing pharmacist in drug utilization review and patient counselling. Am J Pharm Educ 1997; 61: 26–33.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott VG, Amonkar MM, Madhavan SS. Pharmacists' preferences for continuing education and certificate programs. Ann Pharmacother 2001; 35: 289–99.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoyle M, Mottram DR, Williamson PM, Hart A. A study into how community pharmacists update their pharmaceutical knowledge. Pharm J 1990; 245: E8–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pitts J, Vincent S. General practitioners' reasons for not attending a higher professional course. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 271–3.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keene JM, Cervetto S. Health promotion in community pharmacy: a qualitative study. Health Educ J 1995; 54: 285–93.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Savela E, Enlund H, Kostiainen E. In-house training as part of an activity campaign in Finnish pharmacies. J Cont Educ Health Professions 1997; 17: 56–61.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cordero L. Validation and evaluation of continuing education models for community pharmacists [Thesis]. University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loza MI, Cordero L, Fernández-Llimós F, Cadavid MI, Calleja JM, Sanz F et al. El proyecto TESEMED: aprender en las farmacias comunitarias utilizando la telemática. Pharm Care Esp 2000; 2: 440–3.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    SPSS [informatic/COMPUTER program]. Version 10.0 for Windows. Chicago, Illinois: SPSS Inc. 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehra IV, Muller CA. Evaluation of a pilot clinical skills workshop series for community pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ 1998; 62: 136–41.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sinclair H, Bond C, Lennox AC, Silcock J, Winfield A. An evaluation of a training workshop for pharmacists based on the stages of change model of smoking cessation. Health Educ J 1997; 56: 296–312.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vainio KK, Korhonen MJH, Hirvonen AM, Enlund KH. The perceived role and skills of pharmacists in asthma management after in-house training. Pharm World Sci 2001; 23: 6–12.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loza MI, Cordero L, Fernández-Llimós F, Corral P, Cadavid MI, Sanz F et al. Drug information sources used by community pharmacists in Galicia. Pharm Care Esp 2000; 2: 108–22.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Janke KK, Anderson TL. Continuing education needs assessment of Minnesota pharmacists. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy — Annual Meeting 2000; 101: 9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in the pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990; 47: 533–43.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hanson AL. Pharmacists' attitudes toward continuing education: implications for planning curricular CE programs. J Cont Educ Health Professions 1989; 9: 95–113.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Cordero
    • 1
  • M. Isabel Cadavid
    • 1
  • Fernando Fernández-Llimós
    • 2
  • Carlos Díaz
    • 2
  • Ferran Sanz
    • 2
  • Maria Isabel Loza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology, School of PharmacyUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaSpain
  2. 2.Economists, Municipal Institute of Medical ResearchPompeu Fabra UniversityBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations