Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 44–51 | Cite as

The effectiveness of hospital pharmacy in the UK: methodology for finding the evidence

  • Damian Child
  • Judith Cantrill
  • Jonathan Cooke


Objective: To describe the methodology used to identify United Kingdom (UK) hospital pharmacy practice research work from the last two decades.

Method: A comprehensive search for citations that appeared to contribute to the overall evidence or in some way measure, demonstrate or evaluate the effectiveness of UK hospital pharmacy practice. This involved a search of thirteen electronic databases covering a wide variety of UK, European and international publications, hand searching of selected UK journals and conference proceedings, a written request for details sent to all UK Chief Pharmacists and Directors of Pharmacy and a bibliography search of each reference identified. All appropriate references were then added to a single computer database.

Main outcome measure: Number of references identified by each strand of the search strategy.

Results: The search initially highlighted a total of 10,099 articles from the thirteen reference databases, but only 281 were considered suitable for inclusion in the final review. Hand searching of the selected journals and conference proceedings yielded another 173 references and the written requests to hospital chief pharmacists resulted in another 128 references being identified. Finally, bibliography searches of the articles identified by the above three methods resulted in another 242 references, bringing the total number of references to 824.

Conclusion: This paper describes a strategy to identify a comprehensive collection of citations supporting the evidence for the effectiveness of hospital pharmaceutical services in the UK. The large number of references identified demonstrate that hospital pharmacists in the UK make significant contributions to both the research literature and to patient care. However, database searches alone highlighted just 34% of the total references finally included in this study, demonstrating that pharmacy practice research work may be difficult to access by conducting database searches alone. The results from this project provide a resource for the profession and can be utilised as a foundation for future developments in both the delivery and research of hospital pharmacy practice.

Clinical pharmacy Effectiveness of practice Hospital pharmacy Literature searches Pharmacist Pharmacy United Kingdom 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ministry of Health Central Health Services Council. Report of the sub-committee on the Hospital Pharmaceutical Service. London: HMSO, 1955.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Department of Health and Social Security, Scottish Home and Health Department, Welsh Office. Report of the working party on the Hospital Pharmaceutical Service. London: HMSO, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nuffield Committee of Enquiry into Pharmacy. Pharmacy: A report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: The Nuffield Foundation, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Department of Health. Health Services Management. The way forward for Hospital Pharmaceutical Services. HC(88)54. London: Department of Health, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mays N. Health Services Research in Pharmacy: A Critical Personal Review. Manchester: Pharmacy Practice Reseach Resource Centre, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain supported by King's Fund Policy Institute. A New Age for Pharmacy Practice Research. Promoting Evidence-Based Practice in Pharmacy. The Report of the Pharmacy Practice R&D Task Force. London: RPSGB, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexander, AM. Designs and methods becoming 'more robust'. Pharm J 2000; 265: 406–10.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pharmacy in the Future — Implementing the NHS Plan. A programme for pharmacy in the national Health Service. London: Department of Health, 2000. Retrieved from on 28 September 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anon. Guild launches new research award. Pharm J 2000; 265: 876.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence (May 2001). Retrieved from on 28 September 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chalmers I, Dickersin K, Chalmers TC. Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda. BMJ 1992; 305: 786–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Systematic reviews: identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309: 1286–91.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Independent Panel for Pharmaceutical Education and the European Foundation for the Advancement of Healthcare Practitioners. Extending the role of hospital pharmacy technicians. Pharm J 1999; 263: 834–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Audit Commission. A spoonful of sugar. Medicines management in NHS hospitals. London: Audit Commission, 2001. Retrieved from on 7 April 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cotter S, McKee M, Barber N. Hospital clinical pharmacy research in the UK: a review and annotated bibliography. Public Health & Policy 1995; 13: 1–170.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Department of Health. Research and Development for a First Class Service. R&D Funding in the new NHS. London 2000. Retrieved from on 28 September 2002.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McManus RJ, Wilson S, Delaney BC, Fitzmaurice DA, Hyde CJ, Tobias RS et al. Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews BMJ 1998; 317: 1562–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damian Child
    • 1
  • Judith Cantrill
    • 2
  • Jonathan Cooke
    • 3
  1. 1.Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Hope HospitalStott Lane, SalfordUK
  2. 2.School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.South Manchester University Hospitals NHS TrustManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations