Advertisement

Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 34, Issue 1–2, pp 3–29 | Cite as

Large Oscillations of a Thin Cantilever Beam: Physical Experiments and Simulation Using the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation

  • Wan-Suk Yoo
  • Jeong-Han Lee
  • Su-Jin Park
  • Jeong-Hyun Sohn
  • Oleg Dmitrochenko
  • Dmitri Pogorelov
Article

Abstract

Many papers have studied computer-aided simulations of elastic bodies undergoing large deflections and large deformations. But there have not been many attempts to check the validity of the numerical formulations used in these studies. The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate the validity of one such numerical formulation, the absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF), by comparing the results it generates with the results of real experiments. Large oscillations of a thin cantilever beam are studied in this paper to numerically model the beam, which also accounts for the effects of an attached end-point weight and damping forces. The experiments were carried out using a high-speed camera and a data acquisition system.

beams large displacements real experiments absolute nodal coordinate formulation rigid-flexible multibody dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shabana, A. A., ‘Flexible multibody dynamics: Review of past and recent developments’, Multibody System Dynamics 1, 1997, 189–222.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shabana, A. A., Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berzeri, M. and Shabana, A. A., ‘Development of simple models for the elastic forces in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation’, Journal of Sound and Vibration 235(4), 2000, 539–565.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takahashi, Y. and Shimizu, N., ‘Study on elastic forces of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation for deformable beams’, in ASME Proceedings of Design Engineering Technical Conference, VIB-8203, Las Vegas, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takahashi, Y., Shimizu, N., and Suzuki, K., ‘Introduction of damping matrix into absolute nodal coordinate formulation’, in Proceedings of the 1st Asian Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Iwaki, Fikushima, 2002, pp. 33–40.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook, R. D., Malkus D. S., and Plesha M. E., Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 3rd edition, Wiley, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Craig, R. R., Structural Dynamics.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoo, W. S. and Haug, E. J., ‘Dynamics of articulated structures. Part I. Theory, Part II. Computer implementation and application’, Journal of Structural Mechanics 14(1), 1986, 105–126.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singiresu, S. R., Mechanical Vibration, 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gere, J. M. and Timoshenko, S. P., Mechanics of Materials, 4th edition, PWS Publishing Company, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nikravesh, P. E., Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoo, W. S. and Lee, B. H., Dynamics, MoonWonDang, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bathe, K.-J., Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gear, C. W., Guptam G. K., and Leimkuhler, B., ‘Automatic integration of Euler–Lagrange equations with constraints’, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 12(13), 1985, 77–90.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schiehlen, W. (d.), Multibody Systems Handbook, Springer, Berlin, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pogorelov, D., ‘Some developments in computational techniques in modeling advanced mechanical systems’, in Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on Interaction between Dynamics and Control in Advanced Mechanical Systems, D. H. van Campen (ed.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997, pp. 313-320.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pogorelov, D., ‘Differential-algebraic equations in multibody system modeling’, Numerical Algorithms 19, 1998, 183–194.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dmitrotchenko, O. N., ‘Methods of simulating dynamics of hybrid multibody systems with taking into account geometrical nonlinearity’, in Dynamics, Strength and Reliability of Transport Machines, B. G. Keglin (ed.), Bryansk State Technical University, Bryansk, 2001, pp. 24–34 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dmitrotchenko, O. N., ‘Efficient simulation of rigid-flexible multibody dynamics: Some implementations and results’, in Proceedings of NATO ASI on Virtual Nonlinear Multibody Systems, Vol. 1, W. Schielen and M. Valášek (eds.), Prague, 2002, pp. 51–56.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meirovitch, L., Analytical Methods in Vibrations, MacMillan, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Timoshenko, S. P. and Woinowsky-Krieger, S., Theory of Plates and Shells, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zienkiewicz, O. C. and Taylor, R. L., The Finite Element Method, 4th edition, Volume 2: Solid and Fluid Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wan-Suk Yoo
    • 1
  • Jeong-Han Lee
    • 1
  • Su-Jin Park
    • 1
  • Jeong-Hyun Sohn
    • 1
  • Oleg Dmitrochenko
    • 2
  • Dmitri Pogorelov
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPusan National UniversityKumjung-Ku, BusanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Bryansk State Technical UniversityBryanskRussia

Personalised recommendations