Natural Hazards

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 421–435 | Cite as

Integrated Landslide Susceptibility Analysis and Hazard Assessment in the Principality of Andorra

  • Jordi Corominas
  • Ramon Copons
  • Joan Manuel Vilaplana
  • Joan Altimir
  • Jordi Amigó


In the paper we present the procedure for hazard assessment that has been used to prepare the landslide hazard map of the Principality of Andorra at 1:5,000 scale. The main phases of the hazard assessment are discussed. Susceptibility analysis has involved the location of the potential slope failures, and the estimation of both landslide volume and runout distance. In the susceptible areas, landslide magnitude and frequency has been determined in order to produce the Hazard Zoning Map. Data required for hazard assessment have been introduced into a GIS or derived directly from available Digital Terrain Models. Data handling and treatment with the GIS has allowed the performance of the landslide hazard assessment and mapping in a fast and reproducible way.

landslides landslide susceptibility hazard assessment hazard mapping GIS Andorra 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Antoine, P.: 1977, Reflexions sur la cartographie ZERMOS et bilan des expériences en cours, Bulletin Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (2) III, 1/2, 9–20.Google Scholar
  2. Baeza, C.: 1994, Evaluación de las condiciones de rotura y de la movilidad de los deslizamientos superficiales mediante el uso de técnicas de análisis multivariante, Ph.D. thesis. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  3. Brabb, E. E.: 1984, Innovative approaches to landslide hazard and risk mapping, 4th International Symposium on Landslides, Toronto. Vol. 1, 307–323.Google Scholar
  4. Copons, R.; Vilaplana, J. M.; Altimir, J., and Amigó, J.: 2000a. Estimación de la eficacia de las protecciones contra la caída de bloques, Revista de Obras PÚblicas 3394, 37–48Google Scholar
  5. Copons, R., Altimir, J., Amigó. J., Díaz, A., and Vilaplana, J. M. 2000b, EUROBLOC: Un modelo de simulación de caída de bloques y su máxima Adaptación a la realidad, Geotemas, 1, 219–222.Google Scholar
  6. Corominas, J.: 1996, The angle of reach as a mobility index for small and large landslides, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 33, 260–271.Google Scholar
  7. Corominas, J. and Alonso, E. E.: 1990, Geomorphological effects of extreme floods (November 1982) in the Southern Pyrenees, In: Proceedings of Two Lausanne Symposia, August, 1990. Hydrology in Mountainous Regions II. IAHS Publication, 194, 295–302.Google Scholar
  8. Corominas, J., Esgleas, J., and Baeza, C.: 1990, Risk mapping in the Pyrenees area: a case study, Hydrology in Mountainous Regions II, IAHS Publication, 194, 425–428.Google Scholar
  9. Corominas, J. and Moya J.: 1999, Reconstructing recent landslide activity in relation to rainfall in the Llobregat River basin, Eastern Pyrenees, Spain, Geomorphology 30, 79–93.Google Scholar
  10. Fell, R. and Hartford, D.: 1997, Landslide risk management, In: D. Cruden and R. Fell (eds), Landslide Risk Assessment, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 51–109.Google Scholar
  11. Gallart, F. and Clotet, N.: 1988, Some aspects of the geomorphic processes triggered by an extreme rainfall event: the November 1982 flood in the Eastern Pyrenees, Catena Suppl. 13, 79–95.Google Scholar
  12. Hsü, K. J.: 1975, Catastrophic debris streams (sturzstroms) generated by rock falls, Geological Society of America Bulletin 86, 129–140.Google Scholar
  13. Lang, A., Moya, J., Corominas, J., Schrott, L., and Dikau, R.: 1999, Classic and new dating methods for assessing temporal occurrence of mass movements, Geomorphology 30, 33–52.Google Scholar
  14. Lateltin, O.: 1997, Recommandations: prise en compte des dangers dus aux mouvements de terrain dans le cadres des activités de l'aménagement du territoire, OFAT, OFEE and OFEFP. Switzerland. 42 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Leroueil, S., Vaunat, J., Picarelli, L., Locat, J., Lee, H., and Faure, R.: 1996, Geotechnical characterisation of slope movements, Proceedings 7th International Symposium on Landslides, Trondheim. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam. Vol. 1, 53–74.Google Scholar
  16. Lopez, C., Ruíz, J., Amigó, J. and Altimir, J.: 1997, Aspectos metodológicos del diseño de sistemas de protección frente a las caídas de bloques mediante modelos de simulación cinemáticos, IV Simposio Nacional Sobre Taludes y Laderas Inestables, Granada. Vol. 2, 811–823.Google Scholar
  17. Moya, J., Vilaplana, J. M., and Corominas, J.: 1997, Late Quaternary and historical landslides in the south-eastern Pyrenees; In: B. Frenzel et al. (eds), Rapid Mass Movement as a Source of Climatic Evidence for the Holocene, Paläoklimaforschung, vol. 19. Special issue 12, 55-73.Google Scholar
  18. Varnes, D. J.: 1984, Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice, Natural Hazards, 3. UNESCO. Paris. 63 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Wu, T. H.; Tang, W. H., and Einstein, H. H.: 1996, Landslide hazard and risk assessment, In: A. K. Turner and R. L. Schuster (eds), Landslides. Investigation and Mitigation, TRB Special Report 247. National Academy Press. Washington, pp. 106–118.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordi Corominas
    • 1
  • Ramon Copons
    • 2
  • Joan Manuel Vilaplana
    • 3
  • Joan Altimir
    • 2
  • Jordi Amigó
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciences, Civil Engineering SchoolUniversitat Politécnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.EuroconsultEdifici Illa, Andorra la Vella
  3. 3.Departament de Geodinámica i Geofísica, Facultat de GeologiaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Eurogeotécnica, S.A., Centre Tecnológic Europroject, Parc Tecnológic del VallésCerdanyolaSpain

Personalised recommendations