Networks and Spatial Economics

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 115–124 | Cite as

Multiclass Combined Models for Urban Travel Forecasting

  • David Boyce
  • Hillel Bar-Gera
Article

Abstract

Progress in formulating, solving and implementing models with multiple user classes that combine several travel choices into a single, consistent mathematical formulation is reviewed. Models in which the travel times and costs on the road network are link flow-dependent are considered; such models seek to represent congestion endogenously. The paper briefly summarizes the origins of this field in the 1950s and its evolution through the development of solution algorithms in the 1970s. The primary emphasis of the review is on the implementation and application of multiclass models. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of prospects for improved solution algorithms.

Transportation network equilibrium combined travel choice models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aashtiani, H.Z. and T.L. Magnanti. (1981). “Equilibria on a Congested Transportation Network.” SIAM Journal on Algebraic and Discrete Methods 2, 213–226.Google Scholar
  2. Abdulaal, M. and L.J. LeBlanc. (1979). “Methods for Combining Modal Split and Equilibrium Assignment Models.” Transportation Science 13, 292–314.Google Scholar
  3. Abrahamsson, T. and L. Lundqvist. (1999). “Formulation and Estimation of Combined Network Equilibrium Models with Applications to Stockholm.” Transportation Science 33, 80–100.Google Scholar
  4. Altman, E. and L. Wynter. (2003). “Equilibrium, Games, and Pricing in Transportation and Telecommunications Networks.” Networks and Spatial Economics 4(1), 7–21.Google Scholar
  5. Bar-Gera, H. (2002). “Origin-Based Algorithm for the Traffic Assignment Problem.” Transportation Science 36, 398–417.Google Scholar
  6. Bar-Gera, H. and D. Boyce. (2003). “Origin-Based Algorithms for Combined Travel Forecasting Models.” Transportation Research 37B, 405–422.Google Scholar
  7. Beckmann, M., C.B. McGuire, and C.B. Winsten. (1956). Studies in the Economics of Transportation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boyce, D.E. (1984). “Network Models in Transportation/Land Use Planning.” In M. Florian (ed.), Transportation Planning Models. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 475–498.Google Scholar
  9. Boyce, D.E. (1990). “Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Location and Travel Choices: A New Research Agenda.” In M. Chatterji and R.E. Kuenne (eds.), New Frontiers in Regional Science. New York: Macmillan, pp. 238–256.Google Scholar
  10. Boyce, D. (1998). “Long-Term Advances in the State of the Art of Travel Forecasting Methods.” In P. Marcotte and S. Nguyen (eds.), Equilibrium and Advanced Transportation Modelling. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 73–86.Google Scholar
  11. Boyce, D. and H. Bar-Gera. (2001). “Network Equilibrium Models of Travel Choices with Multiple Classes.” In M.L. Lahr and R.E. Miller (eds.), Regional Science Perspectives in Economic Analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 85–98.Google Scholar
  12. Boyce, D. and H. Bar-Gera. (2003). “Validation of Urban Travel Forecasting Models Combining Origin-Destination, Mode and Route Choices.” Journal of Regional Science 43, 517–540.Google Scholar
  13. Boyce, D.E., K.S. Chon, Y.J. Lee, K.T. Lin, and L.J. LeBlanc. (1983). “Implementation and Computational Issues for Combined Models of Location, Destination, Mode and Route Choice.” Environment and Planning A 15, 1219–1230.Google Scholar
  14. Boyce, D.E. and M.S. Daskin. (1997). “Urban Transportation.” In C. ReVelle and A. McGarity (eds.), Design and Operation of Civil and Environmental Engineering Systems. New York: Wiley, pp. 277–341.Google Scholar
  15. Boyce, D.E., L.J. LeBlanc, and K.S. Chon. (1988). “Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Location and Travel Choices: A Retrospective Survey,” Journal of Regional Science 28, 159–183.Google Scholar
  16. Boyce, D. and Y. Zhang. (1998). “Parameter Estimation for Combined Travel Choice Models.” In L. Lundqvist, L.-G. Mattsson and T.J. Kim (eds.), Network Infrastructure and the Urban Environment. Berlin: Springer, pp. 177–193.Google Scholar
  17. Dafermos, S.C. (1972). “The Assignment Problem for Multiclass-User Transportation Networks,” Transportation Science 6, 73–87.Google Scholar
  18. de Cea, J. and J.E. Fernandez. (2001). “ESTRAUS: A Simultaneous Equilibrium Model to Analyze and Evaluate Multimodal Urban Transportation Systems with Multiple User Classes,” In Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Transport Research. Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  19. de Cea, J., J.E. Fernandez, V. Dekock, A. Soto, and T.L. Friesz. (2003). “ESTRAUS: A Computer Package for Solving Supply-Demand Equilibrium Problems on Multimodal Urban Transportation Networks with Multiple User Classes.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Evans, S.P. (1976). “Derivation and Analysis of Some Models for Combining Trip Distribution and Assignment.” Transportation Research 10, 37–57.Google Scholar
  21. Florian, M. (1977). A Traffic Equilibrium Model of Travel by Car and Public Transit Modes.” Transportation Science 11, 166–179.Google Scholar
  22. Florian, M. and S. Nguyen. (1978). “A Combined Trip Distribution, Modal Split and Trip Assignment Model.” Transportation Research 12, 241–246.Google Scholar
  23. Florian, M., J.H. Wu, and S. He. (2002). “A Multi-Class Multi-Mode Variable Demand Network Equilibrium Model with Hierarchical Logit Structures. In M. Gendreau and P. Marcotte (eds.), Transportation and Network Analysis: Current Trends. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 119–133.Google Scholar
  24. Frank, C. (1978). “A Study of Alternative Approaches to Combined Trip Distribution-Assignment Modeling.” Ph.D. Thesis, Regional Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  25. Friesz, T.L. (1981). “An Equivalent Optimization Problem for Combined Multiclass Distribution, Assignment and Modal Split which Obviates Symmetry Restrictions.” Transportation Research 15B, 361–369.Google Scholar
  26. Lam, W.H.K. and H.-J. Huang. (1992a). “A Combined Trip Distribution and Assignment Model for Multiple User Classes.” Transportation Research 26B, 275–287.Google Scholar
  27. Lam, W.H.K. and H.-J. Huang. (1992b). “Calibration of the Combined Trip Distribution and Assignment Model for Multiple User Classes.” Transportation Research 26B, 289–305.Google Scholar
  28. Lam, W.H.K. and H.-J. Huang. (1994). “Comparison of Results of Two Models of Transportation Demand in Hong Kong: CDAM and a Version of MicroTRIPS.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 28, 107–126.Google Scholar
  29. LeBlanc, L.J. and M. Abdulaal. (1982). “Combined Mode Split-Assignment and Distribution-Mode Split-Assignment with Multiple Groups of Travelers.” Transportation Science 16, 430–442.Google Scholar
  30. LeBlanc, L.J. and K. Farhangian. (1981). “Efficient Algorithms for Solving Elastic Demand Traffic Assignment Problems and Mode-Split Assignment Problems.” Transportation Science 15, 306–317.Google Scholar
  31. Murchland, J.D. (1970). “Road Network Traffic Distribution in Equilibrium.” Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences 8, Meisenheim am Glan, Germany: Anton Hain Verlag, pp. 145–183 (German translation).Google Scholar
  32. Oppenheim, N. (1995). Urban Travel Demand Modeling, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Ortúzar, J.D. and L.G. Willumsen. (2001). Modelling Transport, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Patriksson, M. (1994). The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods. Utrecht: VSP.Google Scholar
  35. Patriksson, M. (2003). “Algorithms for Computing Traffic Equilibria.” Networks and Spatial Economics 4(1), 23–38.Google Scholar
  36. Resource Systems Group, Inc. (1997). “Route 53 Alternatives Study, Lake County Model Description,” Environmental Law and Policy Center, Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. Safwat, K.N.A. and T.L. Magnanti. (1988). “A Combined Trip Generation, Trip Distribution, Modal Split, and Trip Assignment Model,” Transportation Science 22, 14–30.Google Scholar
  38. Sheffi, Y. (1985). Urban Transportation Networks. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  39. van Vliet, D., T. Bergman, and W.H. Scheltes. (1986) “Equilibrium Traffic Assignment with Multiple User Classes,” In Proceedings, PTRC Summer Annual Meeting. PTRC Education and Research Services Ltd, London, pp. 111–121.Google Scholar
  40. Wardrop, J.G. (1952). “Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part II 1, 325–378.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, H.C.W.L. (1977). “On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit.” Environment and Planning A 9, 285–344.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Boyce
    • 1
  • Hillel Bar-Gera
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Materials EngineeringUniversity of IllinoisChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations