New Forests

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 23–36 | Cite as

Establishment success of conservation tree plantations in relation to silvicultural practices in Indiana, USA

  • Douglass F. Jacobs
  • Amy L. Ross-Davis
  • Anthony S. Davis
Article

Abstract

In the Central Hardwood Forest region of the United States, the variable and somewhat unpredictable establishment success of hardwood tree plantations has traditionally been attributed to competing vegetation and damage due to animal browse. We examined operational plantation establishment success (1–5 years following planting) as it relates to use of particular silvicultural practices. Silvicultural histories were obtained for 87 randomly selected plantations throughout Indiana and field data were collected from each to determine tree survival, tree vigor, and abundance of surrounding vegetation. Survival was highest at sites that were treated with herbicide prior to planting and that had been mechanically planted (as opposed to hand planted). The percentage of trees with evidence of dieback was highest on sites at which browse protection measures had been used, likely reflecting a combination of damage due to inherently high white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus Zimmermann) populations at such sites and ineffectiveness of current browse protection measures. Sites planted by a professional forester and those with herbicide applied subsequent to planting had a higher percentage of trees deemed free-to-grow. Subsequent herbicide application did not reduce cover or height of competing vegetation; however, when used in conjunction with mechanical site preparation techniques, overall cover and height of herbaceous vegetation was reduced.

Afforestation Browse Free-to-grow Hardwoods Herbicide Site preparation Survival 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belli K.L., Hart C.P., Hodges J.D. and Stanturf J.A. 1999. Assessment of the regeneration potential of red oaks and ash on minor bottoms of Mississippi. South. J. Appl. For. 23: 133–138.Google Scholar
  2. Boyette W.G. and Brenneman D.L. 1978. Hardwood observation plots: five year report. North Carolina Division of Forestry, Forestry Notes 34.Google Scholar
  3. Brisette J.C. and Barnett J.P. 1988. Depth of planting and j-rooting affect loblolly pine seedlings under stress conditions. In: Miller J.H. (ed) Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. USDA For. Ser., South. For. Exp. Stn., Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-74, pp. 169–176.Google Scholar
  4. Ross-Davis A.L., Broussard S.R., Jacobs D.F. and Davis A.S. In review. Afforestation behavior of private landowners: An examination of hardwood tree plantings in Indiana.Google Scholar
  5. Cogliastro A., Gagnon D., Coderre C. and Bhereur P. 1990. Response of seven hardwood tree species to herbicide, rototilling, and legume cover at two southern Québec plantation sites. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 1172–1182.Google Scholar
  6. Cogliastro A., Gagnon D. and Bouchard A. 1993. Effect of site and silvicultural treatment on growth, biomass allocation and nitrogen utilization of seedlings of four broadleaf species in plantations in southwest Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 199–209.Google Scholar
  7. Dey D.C. and Parker W.C. 1997. Morphological indicators of stock quality and field performance of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings underplanted in a central Ontario shelterwood. New Forests 14: 145–156.Google Scholar
  8. Dubois M.R., Chappelka A.H., Robbins E., Somers G. and Baker K. 2000. Tree shelters and weed control: effects on protection, survival and growth of cherrybark oak seedlings planted on a cutover site. New Forests 20: 105–118.Google Scholar
  9. Froud-Williams R.J., Chancellor R.J. and Drennan D.S. 1983. Influence of cultivation regime upon buried weed seeds in arable cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 20: 199–208.Google Scholar
  10. Gillespie A.R., Rathfon R. and Myers R.K. 1996. Rehabilitating a young northern red oak planting with tree shelters. Nor. J. Appl. For. 13: 24–29.Google Scholar
  11. Gordon A.M., Simpson J.A. and Williams P.A. 1995. Six-year response of red oak seedlings planted under a shelterwood in central Ontario. Can. J. For. Res. 25: 603–613.Google Scholar
  12. Hardin J.W., Leopold D.J. and White F.E. 2001. Harlow and Harrar's Textbook of Dendrology. 9th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, 534 p.Google Scholar
  13. Harmer R. and Gill R. 2000. Natural regeneration in broadleaved woodlands: deer browsing and the establishment of advance regeneration. Research Information Note 35. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  14. Hoover W.L. 2002. Focus on private forest landowners: knowing the rules pays off at tax time. J. For. 100: 7.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson P.S. 1975. Growth and structural development of red oak sprout clumps. For. Sci. 21: 413–418.Google Scholar
  16. Karlson A. 2002. Site preparation of abandoned fields and early establishment of planted small-sized seedlings of silver birch. New Forests 23: 159–175.Google Scholar
  17. Kolb T.E., Bowersox T.W. and McCormick L.H. 1990. Influences of light intensity on weed-induced stresses of tree seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 503–507.Google Scholar
  18. Kozlowski T.T. 1976. Water relations and tree improvement. In: Cannel M.G.R. and Last F.T. (Eds) Tree Physiology and Yield Improvement. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Lacaze J.F. 1968. Influence des déformations radiculaires au repiquage sur la croissance de plants d'épicéa en pépiniére. Rev. For. Fran. 20: 580–582.Google Scholar
  20. Larson M.M. 1980. Effects of atmospheric humidity and zonal soil water stress on initial growth of planted northern red oak seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 10: 549–554.Google Scholar
  21. MacGowan B.J., Miller B.K. and Seifert J.R. 2001. Forestry and wildlife management assistance available to Indiana landowners: Providers, Organizations, and Programs. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, Bulletin FNR-87, West Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
  22. Malac B.F. and Heeren R.D. 1979. Hardwood plantation management. S. J. Appl. For. 3: 3–6.Google Scholar
  23. Marquis D.A. 1974. The impact of deer browsing on Allegheny hardwood regeneration. USDA For. Ser., North. For. Exp. Stn., Res. Pap. NE-308.Google Scholar
  24. Marquis D.A. and Brenneman R. 1981. The impact of deer of forest vegetation in Pennsylvania. USDA For. Ser., North. For. Exp. Stn., Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-96.Google Scholar
  25. Martin J.-L. and Baltzinger L.C. 2002. Interaction among deer browsing, hunting, and tree regeneration. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 1254–1264.Google Scholar
  26. McClenahen J.L. and Hutnik R.J. 1979. Effects of cutting intensity, deer browsing, and liming on Allegheny hardwood tree regeneration. Can. J. For. Res. 9: 362–368.Google Scholar
  27. McGill D.W. and Brenneman B.B. 2002. Six-year development of regenerating natural hardwood stands with herbaceous weed control. Nor. J. Appl. For. 19: 14–21.Google Scholar
  28. Miles P. 2001. Indiana's forest resources in 1999. USDA For. Ser., NC Res. Stn., Res. Note NC-377.Google Scholar
  29. Miller J.H. 1993. Oak plantation establishment using mechanical, burning, and herbicide treatments. In: Loftis D. and McGee C.E. (Eds) Proceedings, Oak Regeneration: Serious Problems, Practical Recommendations, Center for Oak Studies. USDA For. Ser., South. For. Exp. Stn., Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, pp. 264–289.Google Scholar
  30. Mohler C. 1993. A model of the effects of tillage on emergence of weed seedlings. Ecol. Appl. 3: 53–73.Google Scholar
  31. Nagubadi V., McNamara K.T., Hoover W.L. and Mills Jr. W.L. 1996. Program participation behavior of nonindustrial forest landowners: a probit analysis. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 28: 323–336.Google Scholar
  32. OMNR (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources) 1994. Cover crops help tree seedlings beat weed competition. Extension Notes 50515.Google Scholar
  33. Pearson H.A., Wolters G.L., Thill R.E., Martin Jr. A. and Baldwin V.C. 1995. Plant response to soils, site preparation, and initial pine planting density. J. Range Manage. 48: 511–516.Google Scholar
  34. Purdue Applied Meteorology Group 2001. Indiana climate page: Normals 1971–2000 [on-line]. Department of Agronomy, Plant and Soil Laboratory © 2001. Available from http://shadow.agry.purdue.edu/sc.index.html. [updated 17 September 2001; cited 24 October 2002].Google Scholar
  35. Ritchie G.A. and Dunlap J.R. 1980. Root growth potential: its development and expression in forest tree seedlings. NZ J. For. Sci. 10: 218–248.Google Scholar
  36. Sander I.L. 1979. Regenerating oaks with the shelterwood system. In: Proceedings, Regenerating Oaks in Upland Hardwood Forests. John S. Wright Forestry Conference. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
  37. Scopel A.L., Ballaré C.L. and Radosevich S.R. 1994. Photostimulation of seed germination during soil tillage. New Phytol. 126: 145–152.Google Scholar
  38. Slusher J.P. 1999. Mechanical tree planters. Co-operative Extension, University of Missouri-Columbia, Agricultural Publication G-05009.Google Scholar
  39. SPSS, Inc. 2000. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 10.0 for Windows. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson M.A. 1984. Evaluation of a mechanized tree-planting operation. USDA For. Ser., North Cent. Res. Stn., Res. Pap. NC-258.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson T.A. 2002. Indiana Geological Survey. Indiana University © 2002. Available from http://igs.indiana.edu/geology/structure/bedrockgeology/index.cfmu. [updated 29 April 2002; cited 07 November 2002].Google Scholar
  42. Tormoehlen B., Gallion J. and Schmidt T.L. 2000. Forests of Indiana: A 1998 Overview. USDA For. Ser., NE Area Sate and Private For., NA-TP-03-00.Google Scholar
  43. USDA-Forest Service 2002. Directory of Conservation and Forest Nurseries [on-line]. The southern region extension forestry office © 2002. Available from www.rngr.net/nurseries/dirfor.html. [updated on 4 June 2001; cited on 24 October 2002].Google Scholar
  44. Ward J.S., Gent M.P.N. and Stephens G.R. 2000. Effects of planting stock quality and browse protection-type on height growth of northern red oak and eastern white pine. For. Ecol. Manage. 127: 205–216.Google Scholar
  45. Willoughby I. and McDonald H.G. 1999. Vegetation management in farm forestry: a comparison of alternative methods of inter-row management. Forestry 72: 109–121.Google Scholar
  46. Wray P.H. 1997. Tree Planting: Establishment and Care. Iowa State University Extension, PM-1677.Google Scholar
  47. Zaczek J.J., Steiner K.C. and Bowersox T.W. 1996. Northern red oak planting stock: 6-year results. New Forests 13: 175–189.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglass F. Jacobs
    • 1
  • Amy L. Ross-Davis
    • 1
  • Anthony S. Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center (HTIRC)Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations