Advertisement

Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 135–190 | Cite as

For-adverbials, Frequentative Aspect, and Pluractionality

  • Veerle van Geenhoven
Article

Abstract

In this paper, I develop a novel interval-based approach to some well-known semantic puzzles related to aspect shift, in particular, to the interaction of for-adverbials with accomplishment and achievement verbs that take indefinite, bare plural, and mass noun complements. My approach is based on the insight that implicit frequentative aspect plays a central role in this interaction, a fact that was largely ignored in previous analyses. Specifically, I interpret frequentative aspect as an abstract verb-level pluractional operator that brings about aspect shift and that is responsible for the distribution of subevent times and subevent participants over the event time of an atelic sentence. What Zucchi and White (2001) call "the aspectual effect of frequency adverbs" thus becomes the general rule for all frequentatively understood for-adverbial sentences. Linguistic support for silent verb-level frequentativity in English is drawn from overt frequentative aspect marking in West Greenlandic verbs.

Keywords

General Rule Previous Analysis Event Time Mass Noun Bare Plural 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, E.: 1986, ‘The Algebra of Events’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.Google Scholar
  2. Bar-el, L.: 2001, ‘Plurality in Squamish Salish: A Look at Reduplication’, in J. Kim and A. Wehrle (eds.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Semantics of Under-represented Languages of the Americas, pp. 1–7. GSLA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, M. and B. Partee: 1978, Towards the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  4. Bittner, M.: 1987, ‘On the Semantics of the Greenlandic Antipassive and Related Constructions’, International Journal of American Linguistics 53, 194–231.Google Scholar
  5. Bittner, M.: 1988, Canonical and Noncanonical Argument Expressions, PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  6. Bittner, M.: 1995, ‘Quantification in Eskimo: A Challenge for Compositional Semantics’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 59–80. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Carlson, G. N.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, A.: 1999, ‘Generics, Frequency Adverbs, and Probability’, Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 221–253.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, C.: 2001, ‘Aspects of Plurality in ±Hoan’, Language 77, 456–476.Google Scholar
  10. Cusic, D.: 1981, Verbal Plurality and Aspect, PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, Ø.: 1985, Tense and Aspect Systems. Blackwel1, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning in Montague Grammar. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  13. Fortescue, M.: 1984, West Greenlandic. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  14. Golovko, E. V.: 1997, ‘Iterativity in Aleut’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Iterative Constructions, pp. 69–91. Lincom Europa, Newcastle.Google Scholar
  15. Gruzdeva, E.: 1997, ‘Plurality of Situations in Nivkh’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Iterative Constructions, pp. 164–188. Lincom Europa, Newcastle.Google Scholar
  16. Krifka, M.: 1989, ‘Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution, and Quantification in Event Semantics’, in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem and P. van Emde-Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions, pp. 75–115. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. Krifka, M.: 1992, ‘Thematic Roles as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution’, in I. A. Sag and A. Szabolsci (eds.), pp. 29–53. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Lasersohn, P.: 1995, Plurality, Conjunction, and Events. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  19. Lasersohn, P.: 1998, ‘Generalized Distributivity Operators’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 83–93.Google Scholar
  20. Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, pp. 303–323. De Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  21. Link, G.: 1987, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, pp. 151–180. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  22. Mittwoch, A.: 1991, ‘In Defence of Vendler's Achievements’, Journal of Linguistics 6, 71–85.Google Scholar
  23. Moltmann, F.: 1991, ‘Measure Adverbials’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 629–660.Google Scholar
  24. Nedjalkov, V. P., I. A. Muravjova, and V. G. Raxtilin: 1997, ‘Plurality of Situations in Chukchee’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Iterative Constructions, pp. 310–330. Lincom Europa, Newcastle.Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, C.: 1987, Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  26. Stechow, A. von: 1996, ‘The Different Readings of Wieder ‘Again’: A Structural Account’, Journal of Semantics 13, 87–138.Google Scholar
  27. Stump, G.: 1981, ‘The Interpretation of Frequency Adjectives’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 629–660.Google Scholar
  28. Stump, G.: 1985, The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Swart, H. de: 1991, Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach, PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
  30. Van Geenhoven, V.: 1998, Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  31. Van Geenhoven, V.: 2000, ‘Pro Properties, Contra Generalized Kinds’, in B. Jackson and T. Matthews (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 10, pp. 221–238. CLC Publications, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  32. Van Geenhoven, V.: 2003, ‘The Semantic Diversity of Characterizing Sentences’, in P. Dekker and R. van Rooy (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 211–216. ILLC, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  33. Van Geenhoven, V.: to appear, ‘Atelicity, Pluractionality, and Adverbial Quantification’, in H. Verkuyl, A. van Hout and H. de Swart (eds.), Perspectives on Aspect. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  34. Vendler, Z.: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  35. Verkuyl, H.: 1972, On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  36. Vlach, F.: 1993, ‘Temporal Adverbials, Tenses and the Perfect’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 231–284.Google Scholar
  37. Xrakovskij, V. S. (ed.): 1997, Typology of Iterative Constructions. Lincom Europa, Newcastle.Google Scholar
  38. Zimmermann, M.: 2000, ‘Pluractional Quantifiers: The Occasional-Construction in English and German’, in B. Jackson and T. Matthews (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 10, pp. 290–306. CLC Publications, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  39. Zucchi, A. and M. White: 2001, ‘Twigs, Sequences, and the Temporal Constitution of Predicates’, Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 223–270.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veerle van Geenhoven
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculteit der Letteren – TaalwetenschapUniversiteit NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations