Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 95–126

On Headed, Headless, and Light-Headed Relatives

  • Barbara Citko
Article

Abstract

This paper re-examines a syntactic typology of relative clauses in the light of new data from Polish. While the distinction between headed and headless relatives seems to be syntactically well motivated, Polish (and possibly other languages as well) allow relatives that cannot easily be assimilated to either of these two types. Such relatives, which I will refer to as light-headed relatives, are the topic of this paper. They are headed by morphologically `light elements', and tend to differ from their headed counterparts with respect to relative pronoun or relative complementizer selection.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aügero-Bautista, Calixto. 2000. 'Universal NPs in Relative Clauses', in R. Billerey and B. D. Lillehaugen (eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
  2. Bailyn, John, and Barbara Citko. 1999. 'Case and Agreement in Slavic Predicates', in K. Dziwirek, H. Coats, and C. M. Vakareliyska (eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Seattle Meeting, 1998, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 17–39.Google Scholar
  3. Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry. Headed Relative Clauses, Mouton de Gruyer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. Bianchi, Valentina. 2000. 'The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses; A Reply to Borsley', Linguistic Inquiry 31, 123–141.Google Scholar
  5. Borsley, Robert. 1997. 'Relative Clauses and the Theory of Phrase Structure', Linguistic Inquiry 28, 629–648.Google Scholar
  6. Borsley, Robert, and Ewa Jaworska. 1988. 'A Note on Preposition Stranding and Case Marking in Polish', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 685–690.Google Scholar
  7. Brame, Michael. 1968. A New Analysis of the Relative Clause: Evidence for an Interpretive Theory, ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  8. Bresnan, Joan, and Jane Grimshaw. 1978. 'The Syntax of Free Relatives in English', Linguistic Inquiry 9, 331–391.Google Scholar
  9. Broihier, Kevin. 1995. Slavic Relatives, Resumptive Pronouns and Learnability, ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  10. Bury, Dirk, and Ad Neeleman. 1999. Projection of Free Relatives, ms., University College London.Google Scholar
  11. Carlson, Greg. 1977. 'Amount Relatives', Language 58, 520–542.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Corver, Norbert. 1990. The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions, Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  15. Dayal, Veneeta. 1997. 'Free Relatives and Ever: Identity and Free Choice Readings', in A. Lawson (ed.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VII, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp. 99–117.Google Scholar
  16. Fisiak, Jacek, Maria Lipińska-Grzegorek, and Tadeusz Zabrocki. 1978. An Introductory English-Polish Contrastive Grammar, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  17. Giusti, Giuliana. 1997. 'The Categorial Status of Determiners', in L. Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, Addison Wesley Longman, New York, pp. 95–123.Google Scholar
  18. Groos, Anneke, and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1981. 'The Matching Effects in Free Relatives: a Parameter of Core Grammar', in A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, pp. 171–216.Google Scholar
  19. Grosu, Alexander. 1994. Three Studies in Locality and Case, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  20. Grosu, Alexander. 1996. 'On the Proper Analysis of “Missing P” Free Relative Constructions', Linguistic Inquiry 27, 41–58.Google Scholar
  21. Grosu, Alexander, and Fred Landman. 1998. 'Strange Relatives of the Third Kind', Natural Language Semantics 6, 125–170.Google Scholar
  22. Harbert, Wayne. 1982. 'On the Nature of the Matching Parameter', The Linguistic Review 2, 237–284.Google Scholar
  23. Hirschbühler, Paul, and Maria-Luisa Rivero. 1983. 'Remarks on Free Relatives and Matching Phenomena', Linguistic Inquiry 14, 505–520.Google Scholar
  24. Hornstein, Norbert. 2000. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  25. Iatridou, Sabine, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Roumyana Izvorski. 1999. 'Some Observations about the Form and the Meaning of the Perfect', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 189–238.Google Scholar
  26. Iatridou, Sabine, and Spyridoula Varlokosta. 1998. 'Pseudoclefts Crosslinguistically', Natural Language Semantics 6, 3–28.Google Scholar
  27. Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. 'On the Quantification Force of English Free Relatives', in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and B. H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 451–487.Google Scholar
  28. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996. The Nature of Adjectival Inflection, Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  30. Larson, Richard. 1987. 'Missing Prepositions and the Analysis of English Free Relative Clauses', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 239–266.Google Scholar
  31. Larson, Richard. 1998. 'Free Relative Clauses and Missing P's: Reply to Grosu', ms., Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
  32. Lasnik, Howard. 1981. 'Restricting the Theory of Transformations: a Case Study', in N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in Linguistics, Longmans, London, pp. 152–173.Google Scholar
  33. Nagórko, Alicja. 2001. Zarys Gramatyki Polskiej (ze Slowotwórstem), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  34. Nunes, Jairo. 1995. The Copy Theory of Movement and Linearization of Chains in the Minimalist Program, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.Google Scholar
  35. Nunes, Jairo. 2000. 'Remnant Movement and Phonetic Realization of Traces', Handout of a GLOW talk.Google Scholar
  36. Nunes, Jairo. 2001. 'Sideward Movement', Linguistic Inquiry 32, 303–344.Google Scholar
  37. Partee, Barbara. 1976. 'Some Transformational Extensions of Montague Grammar', in B. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York, pp. 51–76.Google Scholar
  38. Pesetsky, David. 1998. 'Some Optimality Principles of Sentence Pronunciation', in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis, and D. Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 337–383.Google Scholar
  39. Platzack, Christer. 2000. 'A Complement-of-N0 Account of Restrictive and Non-Restrictive Relatives: The Case of Swedish', in A. Alexiadou, P. Law, A. Meinunger, and C. Wilder (eds.), The Syntax of Relative Clauses, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 265–309.Google Scholar
  40. Safir, Ken. 1999. 'A-bar Reconstruction and Vehicle Change in A-bar Chains', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 587–621.Google Scholar
  41. Sauerland, Uli. 1998. The Meaning of Chains, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  42. Schachter, Paul. 1973. 'Focus and Relativization', Language 53, 19–49.Google Scholar
  43. Suñer, Margarita. 1984. 'Free Relatives and the Matching Parameter', Linguistic Review 3, 363–387.Google Scholar
  44. van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2000. 'Free Relatives: a Syntactic Case Study', Syntax Companion (SynCom), an (Electronic) Encyclopaedia of Syntactic Case Studies, LingComp Foundation.Google Scholar
  45. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French Relative Clauses, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  46. Williamson, Janis. 1987. 'An Indefiniteness Restriction for Relative Clauses in Lakhota', in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 168–190.Google Scholar
  47. Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. 'On the Syntax and Semantics of (Relative) Pronouns and Determiners', Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2, 143–181.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Citko
    • 1
  1. 1.Linguistics ProgramBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations