Mycopathologia

, Volume 157, Issue 2, pp 233–241 | Cite as

Aflatoxin Binders II: Reduction of aflatoxin M1 in milk by sequestering agents of cows consuming aflatoxin in feed

  • Duarte E. Diaz
  • Winston M. HaglerJr.
  • John T. Blackwelder
  • Julie A. Eve
  • Brinton A. Hopkins
  • Kevin L. Anderson
  • Frank T. Jones
  • Lon W. Whitlow
Article

Abstract

Sequestering agents bind dietary aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and reduce absorption from an animal's gastrointestinal tract. As a result, they protect an animal from the toxic effects of AFB1 and reduce transfer of the metabolite, aflatoxin M1 (AFM1), into milk. Three experiments, using late-lactation Holstein cows fed AFB1-contaminated feed, were conducted to evaluate several potential sequestering agents for their abilities to prevent or reduce the transmission of AFM1 into milk. Six agents previously tested in our laboratory forAFB1 binding in vitro were evaluated in these experiments. These were: SA-20®, an activated carbon (AC-A); Astra-Ben-20®, a sodium bentonite (AB-20); MTB-100®, an esterified glucomannan (MTB-100); RedCrown®, a calcium bentonite (RC);Flow Guard®, a sodium bentonite (FG); and Mycrosorb®, a sodium bentonite (MS). Five of the six sequestering agents significantly (P < 0.01) reduced AFM1 contamination of milk (AB-20, 61%; FG, 65%; MS, 50%; MTB-100, 59%; and RC, 31%); whereas, AC-A, activated carbon, had no effect on AFM1 transmission at 0.25% of feed. By the first milking (1 day after cows consumed contaminated feed), AFM1 appeared in milk, then reached maximum levels after three days, and was absent from milk within four days after AFB1 was removed from the feed. Sodium bentonites at 1.2% of feed showed good potential asAFB1 binders; MTB-1OO, a yeast cell wall product, was equally effective at 0.05% in feed. PotentialAFB1 binding agents should be evaluated experimentally to demonstrate efficacy. Our data show that sequestering agents can reduce AFM1 in milk of cows fed AFB1-contaminated feed.

aflatoxin B1 aflatoxin M1 bentonite activated carbon esterified glucomannan sequestering agents 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van Egmond HP, Paulsch WE. Mycotoxins in milk and milk products. Neth Milk Dairy J 1986; 40: 175–188.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Purchase IFH. Acute toxicity of aflatoxins M1 and M2 in one-day-old ducklings. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1967; 5: 339–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Applebaum RS, Marth EH. Use of sulphite or bentonite to eliminate aflatoxin M1 from naturally contaminated raw whole milk. Z Lebensm Unters Frosch 1982; 174: 303–305.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harvey RB, Phillips TD, Ellis JA, Kubena LF, Huff WE, Petersen HD. Effects on aflatoxin M1 residues in milk by addition of hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate to aflatoxin-contaminated diets of dairy cows. Am J Vet Res 1991; 52: 1556–1559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galvano F, Pietri A, Fallico B, Bertuzzi T, Scire S, Galvano M, Maggiore R. Activated carbons: In vitro affinity for aflatoxin B1 and relation of adsorption ability to physiochemical parameters. J Food Prot 1996b; 59: 545–550.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramos AJ, Fink GJ, Hernandez E. Prevention of toxic effects of mycotoxins by means of nonnutritive adsorbent compounds. J Food Prot 1996; 59: 631–641.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galvano F, Piva A, Ritieni A, Galvano G. Dietary strategies to counteract the effects of mycotoxins: A review. J Food Prot 2001; 64: 120–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huwig A, Freimund S, Kappeli O, Dutler, H. Mycotoxin detoxification of animal feed by different adsorbents. Toxicol Lett 2001; 122: 179–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramos AJ, Hernandez E. Prevention of aflatoxicosis in farm animals by means of hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate addition to feedstuffs: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1997; 65: 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diaz DE, Hagler Jr, WM, Hopkins BA, Whitlow LW. Aflatoxin Binder I: In vitro binding assay for aflatoxin B1 by several potential sequestering agents. Mycopathologia 2003; 156: 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galvano F, Pietri A, Bertuzzi T, Fusconi G, Galvano M, Piva A, Piva G. Reduction of carryover of aflatoxin from cow feed to milk by addition of activated carbons. J Food Prot 1996a; 59: 551–554.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kimaryamma AB, Rajan B, Gangadharan B, Manomohan CB. In vitro and in vivo studies on aflatoxin B1 neutralization. Indian J Anim Sci 1991; 61: 58–60.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Phillips TD, Kubena LF, Harvey RB, Taylor DR, Heidelbaugh ND. Hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate: A high affinity sorbent for aflatoxin. Poultry Sci 1988; 67: 243–247.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Traag WA, Van Trijp JMP, Tuinstra LGMT, Kok WT. Sample cleanup and post-column derivatization for the determination of aflatoxin B1 in feedstuffs by liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 1987; 396: 389–394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle (NRC), 6th rev. ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Egmond HP, Dragacci S. Liquid chromatographic methods for aflatoxin MI in milk. In: Trucksess MW, Pohland AE, eds. Mycotoxin protocols, Humana Press, Inc., New Jersey, 200; 59–69.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    SAS Institute, 1998SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. 8th ed., SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frobish, RA, Bradley BD, Wagner DD, Long-Bradley PE, Hairston H. Aflatoxin residues in milk of dairy cows after ingestion of naturally contaminated grain. J Food prot 1986; 49: 781–785.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flores CM, Dominguez JM, Diaz-de-Leon J. Modeling and experimental comparison of the differential adsorption of B1 and GI aflatoxins on mineral aluminosilicate surfaces. J Environ Path Toxicol Oncol 1999; 18: 213–220.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scheideler, SE. Effects of various types of aluminosilicates and aflatoxin BI on aflatoxin toxicity, chick performance, and mineral status. Poultry Sci 1993; 72: 282–288.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dwyer MR, Kubena LF, Harvey RB, Mayura K, Sarr AB, Buckley S, Bailey RH, Phillips TD. Effects of inorganic absorbents and cyclopiazonic acid in broiler chicks. Poultry Sci 1997; 76: 1141–1149.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Duarte E. Diaz
    • 1
  • Winston M. HaglerJr.
    • 2
  • John T. Blackwelder
    • 1
  • Julie A. Eve
    • 1
  • Brinton A. Hopkins
    • 1
  • Kevin L. Anderson
    • 3
  • Frank T. Jones
    • 4
  • Lon W. Whitlow
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of Poultry Science, College of Agricultural and Life SciencesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.College of Veterinary MedicineNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  4. 4.Department of Poultry ScienceUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations