Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 147–169 | Cite as

Enhancing Students' Engagement by Increasing Teachers' Autonomy Support

  • Johnmarshall Reeve
  • Hyungshim Jang
  • Dan Carrell
  • Soohyun Jeon
  • Jon Barch
Article

Abstract

Engagement refers to the behavioral intensity and emotional quality of a person's active involvement during a task. Recognizing the benefits highly engaged people experience, we tested whether classroom teachers could incorporate the relatively foreign concept of autonomy support into their motivating styles as a way to promote their students' engagement during instruction. Teachers in an experimental group and teachers in a delayed-treatment control group received information and guidance consistent with self-determination theory on how to support students' autonomy. Over a series of 3 classroom observations, trained raters scored each teacher's autonomy support and 2 measures of their students' engagement–task involvement and influence attempts. Trained teachers displayed significantly more autonomy-supportive behaviors than did nontrained teachers. Further, the more teachers used autonomy support during instruction, the more engaged were their students. This was true on both measures of engagement.

autonomy autonomy support engagement high school teachers self-determination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivational processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, M., & Boggiano, A. K. (1988). Fostering extrinsic orientations: Use of reward strategies to motivate children. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 293-309.Google Scholar
  3. Boggiano, A. K., Barrett, M., Weiher, A. W., McClelland, G. H., & Lusk, C. M. (1987). Use of the maximal-operant principle to motivate children's intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 866-879.Google Scholar
  4. Boggiano, A. K., Flink, C., Shields, A., Seelbach, A., & Barrett, M. (1993). Use of techniques promoting students' self-determination: Effects on students' analytic problem-solving skills. Motivation and Emotion, 17, 319-336.Google Scholar
  5. Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-esteem processes across the life-span. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), The self in transition: From infancy to childhood (pp. 61-97). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65, 493-506.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-esteem processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes in development: Minnesota symposium on child psychology, (Vol. 23, pp. 167-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. deCharms, R. (1976). Enhancing motivation: Change in the classroom. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L. (1995). Why we do what we do: The dynamics of personal autonomy. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142.Google Scholar
  11. Deci, E. L., Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1-10.Google Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.Google Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adult's orientations toward control versus autonomy in children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642-650.Google Scholar
  15. Deci, E. L., Spiegel, N. H., Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Kauffman, M. (1982). Effects of performance standards on teaching styles: Behavior of controlling teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 852-859.Google Scholar
  16. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation in education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346.Google Scholar
  17. Fiedler, M. L. (1975). Bidirectionality of influence in classroom interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 735-744.Google Scholar
  18. Fincham, F. D., Hokoda, A., & Sanders, R. (1989). Learned helplessness, test anxiety, and academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. Child Development, 60, 1461-1474.Google Scholar
  19. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. A. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162.Google Scholar
  20. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.Google Scholar
  21. Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 347-356.Google Scholar
  22. Harter, S., & Connell, J. P. (1984). A model of the relationship among children's academic achievement and their self-perceptions of competence, control, and motivational orientation. In J. Nichols (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 219-250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1990). Socialization of student teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 279-300.Google Scholar
  24. Koenigs, S. S., Fiedler, M. L., & deCharms, R. (1977). Teacher beliefs, classroom interaction and personal causation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 95-114.Google Scholar
  25. McClelland, D. C., & Winter, D. G. (1969). Motivating economic achievement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mook, D. G. (1988). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.Google Scholar
  27. Newby, T. J. (1991). Classroom motivation: Strategies of first-year teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 195-200.Google Scholar
  28. Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children's behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 781-791.Google Scholar
  29. Pelletier, L. G., Seguin-Levesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers' motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 186-196.Google Scholar
  30. Pelletier, L. G., & Vallerand, R. J. (1996). Supervisors' beliefs and subordinates' intrinsic motivation: A behavioral confirmation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 331-340.Google Scholar
  31. Reeve, J. (1996). Motivating others: Nurturing inner motivational resources. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  32. Reeve, J. (1998). Autonomy support as an interpersonal motivating style: Is it teachable? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 312-330.Google Scholar
  33. Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183-203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  34. Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding the sociocultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp. 31-59). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.Google Scholar
  35. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Hardre, P., & Omura, M. (2002). Providing a rationale in an autonomy-supportive way as a strategy to motivate others during an uninteresting activity. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 183-207.Google Scholar
  36. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.Google Scholar
  37. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 550-558.Google Scholar
  39. Ryan, R. M., & La Guardia, J. G. (1999). Achievement motivation within a pressured society: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to learn and the politics of school reform. In T. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 11, pp. 45-85). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  40. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.Google Scholar
  41. Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Connell, J. P. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (2-3, Whole No. 204).Google Scholar
  42. Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.Google Scholar
  43. Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Engaged and disaffected action: The conceptualization and measurement of motivation in the academic domain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
  44. Wellborn, J. G., Connell, J. P., & Skinner, E. A. (1989). The Student Perceptions of Control Questionnaire (SPOCQ). Technical Report, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johnmarshall Reeve
    • 1
  • Hyungshim Jang
    • 2
  • Dan Carrell
    • 3
  • Soohyun Jeon
    • 1
  • Jon Barch
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IowaIowa City
  2. 2.University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukee
  3. 3.American College TestingIowa City

Personalised recommendations