Climate Change and Energy Technologies

Article

Abstract

The long time scale of the climate change problem and the inherent nature of the carbon cycle bring important implications for present technology development efforts. Even if major technology improvements are achieved for non-carbon-emitting technologies such as energy-intensity improvements, wind, solar, biomass, and nuclear over the course of the 21st century, most examinations of potential future greenhouse emissions conclude that additional technology development will be required to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations. The evelopment of an expanded suite of technologies including carbon capture and disposal, hydrogen systems and biotechnology hold the potential to dramatically reduce the cost of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations. This paper examines these technologies in the context of a global integrated assessment model of energy, agriculture, land-use, economics, and carbon cycle processes.

biotechnology carbon capture and disposal climate change energy technology hydrogen systems integrated assessment modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Audus, H.: 2001, 'Leading options for the capture of CO2 at power stations', in D.J. Williams, R.A. Durie, P. McMullan, C.A.J. Paulson and A.Y. Smith (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Collingswood, VIC, Australia, CSIRO.Google Scholar
  2. Battelle Memorial Institute: 2001, A Global Energy Addressing Climate Change: An Initial Report an International Public-Private Collaboration, College Park,MD, Joint Global Change Research Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Butt, D.P., Lackner, K.S., Wente, C.H., Nomura, K. and Yanagisawa, Y.: 1998, The Importance of and a Method for Disposing of Carbon Dioxide in a Thermodynamically Stable Form, LA-UR-98-1108, Los Alomos, New Mexico, Los Alomos National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  4. Dahowski, R., Dooley, J., Brown, D., Mizoguchi, A., and Shiozaki, M.: 2001, 'Understanding carbon sequestration options in the United States: Capabilities of a carbon management geographic information system', Proceedings of the First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC, May 2001.Google Scholar
  5. Edmonds, J., Clarke, J., Dooley, J., Kim, S.H. and Smith, S.J.: 'Stabilization of CO2 in a B2 world: Insights on the roles of carbon capture and disposal, hydrogen, and transportation technologies', accepted for publication in Energy Economics, Special Issue, Weyant, J. and Tol, R. editors, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  6. Edmonds, J. and Reilly, J.: 1985, Global Energy: Assessing the Future, New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 317.Google Scholar
  7. Edmonds, J. and Reilly, J.: 1983. 'Global energy and CO2 to 2050', Energy J. 4(3), 21–47.Google Scholar
  8. Edmonds, J.A., Reilly, J.M., Gardner, R.H. and Brenkert, A.: 1986, Uncertainty in future global energy use and fossil fuel CO2 emissions 1975 to 2075, TR036, DO3/NBB-0081 Dist. Category UC-11, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield Virginia 22161.Google Scholar
  9. Edmonds, J., Wise,M., Pitcher, H., Richels, R., Wigley, T. and MacCracken, C.: 1996, 'An integrated assessment of climate change and the accelerated introduction of advanced energy technologies: An application of MiniCAM 1.0', Miti. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 1(4), 311–339.Google Scholar
  10. Egberts, P.J.P., Keppel, J.F., Wildenborg, A.F.B., Peersmann, M.R.H.E., Hendriks, C.A., van der Waart A.S. and Byrman, C.: 2002, 'A decision support system for underground CO2 sequestration', Paper to be presented at Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Kyoto, Japan, (October), http://www.rite.or.jp/GHGT6/pdf/L1-3.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. Freund, P. and Ormerod, W.G.: 1997, 'Progress toward storage of carbon dioxide', Energy Conv. Manag. 38, S199–S204.Google Scholar
  12. Goff, F. and Lackner, K.S.: 1998, 'Carbon dioxide sequestrating using ultramafic rocks', Envir. Geosci. 5(3), 89–101.Google Scholar
  13. Herzog, H., Drake, E. and Adams, E.: 1997, CO2 Capture, Reuse, and Storage Technologies for Mitigation Global Climate Change, Cambridge, MA, MIT Energy Laboratory, MIT.Google Scholar
  14. Hourcade, J.-C., Shukla, P.R., Cifuentes, L., Davis, D., Edmonds, J., Fisher, B., Fortin, E., Golub, A., Hohmeyer, O., Krupnick, A., Kverndokk, S., Loulou, R., Richels, R., Segenovic, H. and Yamaji, K.: 2001, 'Global, regional, and national costs and ancillary benefits of mitigation', in B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. The Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Chapter 8, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 499–559.Google Scholar
  15. Hulme, M. and Raper, S.: 1993, 'An integrated framework to address climate change (ESCAPE) and further developments of the global and regional climate modules (MAGICC)', A paper prepared for the International Workshop on Integrative Assessment of Mitigation, Impacts and Adaptation to Climate Change, October 13-15, 1993, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  16. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2001, in J.T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden and D. Xiaosu (eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. The Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 944.Google Scholar
  17. Kheshgi, H., Smith, S.J. and Edmonds, J.A.: 2003, 'Emissions and atmospheric CO2 stabilization: Long-term limits and paths', submitted to Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.Google Scholar
  18. Lackner, K.S., Ziock, H.J. and Grimes, P.: 1999, 'Carbon dioxide extraction from air: Is it an option?' in the Proceedings of the 24th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems(March), Clearwater Florida, pp. 885–896.Google Scholar
  19. Leggett, J., Pepper, W.J., Swart, R.J., Edmonds, J., Meira Filho, L.G., Mintzer, I., Wang, M.X. and Wasson, J.: 1992, 'Emissions scenarios for the IPCC: An update', in Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge, UK, University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marland, G., Boden, T.A. and Andres, R.J.: 2002, Global, Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A., Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  21. McGrail, B.P., Ho, A.M., Reidel, S.P. and Schaef, H.T.: 2002, 'Use and features of basalt formations for geologic sequestration', in N. Matsumiya (ed.), Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth, Kyoto, Japan, http://www.rite.or.jp/GHGT6/pdf/SGMOP1.pdf.Google Scholar
  22. Nakicenovic, N. et al.: 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Vision 21 Technology Roadmap, http://www.netl.doe.gov/coalpower/vision21/pubs/v21rdmp.pdf.Google Scholar
  24. Toth, F.L., Mwandosya, M., Carraro, C., Christensen, J., Edmonds, J., Flannery, B., Gay-Garcia, C., Lee, H., Meyer-Abich, K.M., Nikitina, E., Rahman, A., Richels, R., Ruqiu, Y., Villavicencio, A., Wake, Y. and Weyant, J.: 2001, 'Decision-making frameworks', in B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. The Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Chaper 10, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 603–678.Google Scholar
  25. United Nations: 1992, Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  26. United Nations: 1997, Kyoto Protocol To The United Nations Framework Convention On Climate Change, New York, United Nations.Google Scholar
  27. United States Department of Energy: 2000, Coal and Power Systems: Strategic & Multi-year Program Plans, Washington, DC, p. 2-8–2-9.Google Scholar
  28. Van Bergen F., Wildenborg, T. and Gale J.: 2002, 'Worldwide selection of early opportunities for EOR and ECBM', Paper to be presented at Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Kyoto, Japan, (October).Google Scholar
  29. Wigley, T.M.L.: 1994a, MAGICC Version 1.2: User's Guide and Scientific Reference Manual, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO. 23 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Wigley, T.M.L.: 1994b, 'A simple model for estimating methane concentration and lifetime variations', Climate Dynamics 9, 181–193.Google Scholar
  31. Wigley, T.M.L. and Raper, S.C.B.: 2001, 'Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming', Science 293, 451–454.Google Scholar
  32. Wigley, T.M.L. and Raper, S.C.B.: 1993, 'Future changes in global-mean temperature and sea level', in R.A.Warrick, E. Barrow and T.M.L. Wigley (eds.), Climate and Sea Level Change: Observations, Projections and Implications, pp. 111–133, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 424 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Wigley, T.M.L. and Raper, S.C.B.: 1992, 'Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios', Nature 357, reprint.Google Scholar
  34. Wigley, T.M.L. and Raper, S.C.B.: 1987, 'Thermal expansion of seawater associated with global warming', Nature 330, 127–131.Google Scholar
  35. Wigley, T.M.L., Richels, R. and Edmonds, J.A.: 1996, 'Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations', Nature 379(6562), 240–243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryJoint Global Change Research Institute at the University of Maryland in College ParkCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations