Minds and Machines

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 231–240 | Cite as

Disinformation: The Use of False Information

  • James H. Fetzer

Abstract

The distinction between misinformation and disinformation becomes especially important in political, editorial, and advertising contexts, where sources may make deliberate efforts to mislead, deceive, or confuse an audience in order to promote their personal, religious, or ideological objectives. The difference consists in having an agenda. It thus bears comparison with lying, because “lies” are assertions that are false, that are known to be false, and that are asserted with the intention to mislead, deceive, or confuse. One context in which disinformation abounds is the study of the death of JFK, which I know from more than a decade of personal research experience. Here I reflect on that experience and advance a preliminary “theory of disinformation” that is intended to stimulate thinking on this increasingly important subject. Five kinds of disinformation are distinguished and exemplified by real life cases I have encountered. It follows that the story you are about to read is true.

assassination Assassination Science disinformation fabricated evidence JFK misinformation Murder in Dealey Plaza The Warren Report 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carl, L. (ed.) (1990), The International Directory of Intelligence, McLean, VA: International Defense Consultant Services.Google Scholar
  2. Costello, G. (1994), 'Kennedy Assassination: Case Still Open', Federal Bar News &; Journal 41 (March/April).Google Scholar
  3. Costello, G. (2001), Review of Murder in Dealey Plaza, The Federal Lawyer (May), pp. 52–56.Google Scholar
  4. Fetzer, J. H. (1996), Philosophy and Cognitive Science, 2nd edition, St. Paul, MN: Paragon House Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Fetzer, J. H. (1998), Assassination Science, Chicago, IL: Catfeet Press/Open Court.Google Scholar
  6. Fetzer, J. H. (2000), Murder in Dealey Plaza, Chicago, IL: Catfeet Press/Open Court.Google Scholar
  7. Fetzer, J. H. (2003), 'Information: Does It Have To Be True?', Minds and Machines 14, pp. 223–229.Google Scholar
  8. Franzen, E.-U. (1998), 'Conspiracy Collection Falls Short', Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (18 January 1998), p. 10E.Google Scholar
  9. Hersh, S. (1997), The Dark Side of Camelot, New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Milstead, D. (2001), 'Tax Checks in the Mail — With a Catch!', The Rocky Mountain News (21 July).Google Scholar
  11. Posner, G. (1993), Case Closed, New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. White, J. (2001a), A Post from Jack White on JFKresearch.com (14 January at 16:12:48).Google Scholar
  13. White, M. (2001b), A Post from Martin White on JFkresearch.com (3 February at 12:48).Google Scholar
  14. Wrone, D. (1995), Review of Gerald Posner, Case Closed, Journal of Southern History 6 (February), pp. 186–188.Google Scholar
  15. Wrone, D. (1998), 'Shame on You, Sy, for that Awful Book on JFK', Capital Times of Madison, WI (16 January).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • James H. Fetzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MinnesotaDuluthUSA

Personalised recommendations