Advertisement

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 137–141 | Cite as

Interpreting definitions: The problem of interpreting definitions of medical concepts

  • Per-Erik Liss
  • Olle Aspevall
  • Daniel Karlsson
  • Urban Forsum
Article

Abstract

During the last hundred years medical language has been influenced by scientific and technological progress. As a result uncertainty in medical communication is increasing. This may have serious consequences not only for health care delivery but also for medical science. Disease classification, assessment of the validity of epidemiological investigations and comparison of the results of various investigations are examples of what will become less secure. The purpose of the article is to emphasise a main source of uncertainty — the problem of interpreting definitions. Two issues of interpretation are explored. One concerns the logical status of a statement and the other the function of a statement. It is concluded that the security of medical language can be increased through the elucidation of the logical status and functions of statements making up medical concepts.

accompanying characteristic communication concept defining characteristic definition recognising characteristic uncertainty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D.M. (ed.): 1994, Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 28th edn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
  2. Andriole, V.T. (ed.): 1997, ‘Urinary Tract Infections’, in: R.C. Moellering (ed.), Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
  3. Brumfitt, W.: 1998, ‘The Urethral Syndrome’, in: W. Brumfitt, J.M.T. Hamilton-Miller and R.B. Bailey (eds.). Urinary Tract Infections (London: Chapman & Hall).Google Scholar
  4. Oxford Concise Medical Dictionary: 1985, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Faber, K.: 1923, Nosography in Modern Internal Medicine, 2nd edn. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hempel, C.G.: 1952, ‘Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science’, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science VII(7).Google Scholar
  7. Hospers, J.: 1978, An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Information från Läkemedelsverket [Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections]: 1990, 1(1), 21–44.Google Scholar
  9. Liss, P-E.: 1993, Health Care Need. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  10. Mobley, H.L.T. and J.W. Warren (eds.): 1996, Urinary Tract Infections: Molecular Pathogenesis and Clinical Management. Washington DC: ASM Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nordenfelt, L.: 1995, On the Nature of Health, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Sussman M.: 1998, ‘Urinary Tract Infection’, in: W.J. Hausler and M. Sussman (eds.), Topley and Wilson'sMicrobiology and Microbial Infections, 9th edn. Vol. 3, Bacterial Infections (London: Arnold).Google Scholar
  13. Wulff, H.R., S.A. Pedersen and R. Rosenberg: 1990, Philosophy of Medicine, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per-Erik Liss
    • 1
  • Olle Aspevall
    • 2
    • 3
  • Daniel Karlsson
    • 4
  • Urban Forsum
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health and SocietyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Karolinska Institutet, Department of Immunology, Microbiology, Pathology and Infectious Diseases. Division of Clinical and Oral BacteriologyHuddinge University HospitalHuddingeSweden
  3. 3.Department of Molecular and Clinical MedicineLinköping UniversitySweden
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical EngineeringLinköping UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations