Advertisement

Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 19–30 | Cite as

A New Method for Classifying Patterns of Prenatal Care Utilization Using Cluster Analysis

  • Deborah Rosenberg
  • Arden Handler
  • Sylvia Furner
Article

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were: to 1) define patterns of prenatal care utilization using cluster analysis, 2) describe two alternative cluster solutions and compare these groupings to the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index (APNCU), 3) compare the cluster solutions and the APNCU with respect to maternal age and prematurity, and 4) discuss advantages and disadvantages of using cluster analysis to study prenatal care. Methods: The study sample included 3544 women in the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey for whom complete prenatal care visit data were available. Clustering was carried out in two stages, first employing nearest centroid sorting (the k means method), a nonhierarchical approach, and then using Ward's Minimum Variance Method, a hierarchical clustering technique. Results: Patterns of prenatal care defined by cluster analysis varied by timing of the first visit, total number of visits, and the rate of accumulation of visits, but this variation was different compared to that seen for the APNCU. While the cluster solutions and the APNCU identified a similar normative pattern of care, other patterns identified were quite different. In particular, the six-cluster solution differentiated among women who entered care at similar times, but accumulated visits at differing rates and experienced differing rates of preterm delivery. Conclusion: Cluster analysis is a new tool for studying prenatal care. Further studies are needed to refine the method and test whether the alternative perspective it provides will lead to new findings concerning the relationship of prenatal care and birth outcomes.

prenatal care cluster analysis methods measurement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

references

  1. 1.
    TaffelS. Prenatal Care in the United States, 1969–1975. National Center for Health Statistics, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, DHEW Publication No. (PHS) 78-1911, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    KleinmanJC. Methodological issues in the analysis of vital statistics. In: Kiely, M, editor. Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1991: 448–68.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    KielyJ, KoganM. Prenatal care. In: WilcoxLS, MarksJS. editors, From Data to Action. Atlanta. GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, DHHS, 1995: 105–18.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    MerkatzIR, ThompsonJE. New Perspectives on Prenatal Care. New York: Elsevier Science, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    CaroFG, KalmussD, LopezI. Barriers to prenatal care: An examination of use of prenatal care among low income women in New York City. Community Services Society of New York, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Committee to Study the Prevention of Low Birthweight. Preventing low birthweight. Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    BrownSS (editor). Prenatal care reaching mothers, reaching infants. Summary and Recommendations, Committee to Study Outreach for Prenatal Care, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988;13(3):277–90.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    StrobinoDM, Kane, LP, Frank, RG, Decoster, E. Trends in publicly financed prenatal and related services, 1975–1984. J Public Health Policy Autumn, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    US Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy People 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives for the nation. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    US Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy People 2010 Objectives: Draft for public comment. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    AlexanderGR, TompkinsME, PetersenDJ, WeissJ. Source of bias in prenatal care utilization indices: Implications for evaluating the Medicaid expansion. Am J Public Health 1991;81:1013–16.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Public Health Service Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care. Caring for our Future: The Content of Prenatal Care, Washington, DC: Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    HarrisJE. Prenatal medical care and infant mortality. In FuchsVR, editor. Economic Aspects of Health. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    KessnerDM, SingerJ, KalkCE, SchlesingerER. Infant Death: An Analysis by Maternal Risk and Health Care, Vol I., Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine and National Academy of Sciences, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    AlexanderGR, CornelyDA. Prenatal care utilization: Its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome. Am J Prev Med 1988;3:243–53.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    KotelchuckM. The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index: Its US distribution and association with low birthweight. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1486–89.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    KotelchuckM. An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Am. J. Public Health 1994;84:1414–20.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    AlexanderGR, KotelchuckM. Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: A comparison of indices. Public Health Rep 1996;111:408–418.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    SandersonM, ScottC, GonzalezJF. 1988 National maternal and infant health survey: methods and response characteristics. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(125), 1998.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    AnderbergMR. Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    DuranBS, OdellPL. Cluster Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    HartiganJA. Clustering Algorithms. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    DidayE, HayashiC (editors). Recent developments in clustering and data analysis. In: Proceedings of the Japanese–French Scientific Seminar, March 24–26, 1987, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    EverittBS. Cluster Analysis, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1993.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT* User's Guide, Version 6, 4th ed, Vol 1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc, 1989.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    AlexanderGR, KorenbrotCC. The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight. In: The Future of Children, Vol 5. Los Altos, CA: Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 1995: 103–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Rosenberg
    • 1
  • Arden Handler
    • 2
  • Sylvia Furner
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public HealthUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicago
  2. 2.Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public HealthUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations