Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 367–391 | Cite as

Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences

  • Uli Sauerland


This article develops a Gricean account for the computation of scalarimplicatures in cases where one scalar term is in the scope ofanother. It shows that a cross-product of two quantitative scalesyields the appropriate scale for many such cases. One exception iscases involving disjunction. For these, I propose an analysis that makesuse of a novel, partially ordered quantitative scale for disjunction andcapitalizes on the idea that implicatures may have different epistemic status.


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Epistemic Status Complex Sentence Scalar Implicature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atlas, J. D. and S. C. Levinson: 1981, ‘It-Clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics (Revised Standard Version)’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, NY, pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
  2. Chierchia, G.: 2002, ‘Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax/Pragmatics Interface’, unpublished manuscript, University of Milan Bicocca (to appear in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford.).Google Scholar
  3. Gamut, L.: 1991, Logic, Language, and Meaning, Volume 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  4. Gazdar, G.: 1979, Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form, Academic Press, NY.Google Scholar
  5. Grice, P.: 1975 [1967], ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, Academic Press, NY, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
  6. Harnish, R.: 1976, ‘Logical Form and Implicature’, in T. Bever et al. (eds.), An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability, Crowell, New York, pp. 313–391.Google Scholar
  7. Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  8. Hirschberg, J.: 1991 [1985], A Theory of Scalar Implicature, Garland, NY (PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, PA).Google Scholar
  9. Horn, L. R.: 1972, ‘On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English’, PhD thesis, University of California, LA.Google Scholar
  10. Horn, L. R.: 1989, A Natural History of Negation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  11. Kadmon, N.: 2001, Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presuppositions, and Focus, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA, and Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Landman, F.: 1998, ‘Plurals and Maximalization’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, Kluwer, pp. 237–271.Google Scholar
  13. Landman, F.: 2000, Events and Plurality, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  14. Levinson, S. C.: 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Levinson, S. C.: 2000, Presumptive Meanings, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Matsumoto, Y.: 1995, ‘The Conversational Condition on Horn Scales’, Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 21–60.Google Scholar
  17. McCawley, J. D.: 1993, Everything that Linguists have Always Wanted to Know about Logic, 2nd edn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  18. Sauerland, U.: 2002, ‘The Present Tense is Vacuous’, Snippets 6.Google Scholar
  19. Schwarz, B.: 2000, ‘On Long Coordinations’, Talk at Tübingen University.Google Scholar
  20. Simons, M.: 2000 [1998], Issues in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Disjunction, Garland, NY. (PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.).Google Scholar
  21. Soames, S.: 1982, ‘How Presuppositions are Inherited: A Solution to the Projection Problem’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 483–545.Google Scholar
  22. von Fintel, K.: 2000, ‘Conditional Strengthening: A Case Study in Implicature’, unpublished manuscript, MIT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uli Sauerland
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of ConneticutCTUSA

Personalised recommendations