Landscape Ecology

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 677–690

Estimating the ‘critical’ distance at which adjacent land-use degrades wetland water and sediment quality

  • Jeff E. Houlahan
  • C. Scott Findlay


Conversion of forested lands to agriculture or urban/residential areas has been associated with declines in stream and lake water quality. Less attention has been paid to the effects of adjacent land-uses on wetland sediment and water quality and, perhaps more importantly, the spatial scales at which these effects occur. Here we address these issues by examining variation in water and sediment nutrient levels in 73 southeastern Ontario, Canada, wetlands. We modeled the relationship between water and sediment nutrient concentrations and various measures of adjacent land-use such as forest cover and road density, measured over increasing distances from the wetland edge. We found that water nitrogen and phosphorous levels were negatively correlated with forest cover at 2250 meters from the wetland edge, while sediment phosphorous levels were negatively correlated with wetland size and forest cover at 4000 meters and positively correlated with the proportion of land within 4000 meters that is itself wetland. These results suggest that the effects of adjacent land-use on wetland sediment and water quality can extend over comparatively large distances. As such, effective wetland conservation will not be achieved merely through the creation of narrow buffer zones between wetlands and more intensive land-uses. Rather, sustaining high wetland water quality will require maintaining a heterogeneous regional landscape containing relatively large areas of natural forest and wetlands.

Buffer zones Landscape Phosphorous Nitrogen Scale Sediments Wetland management Ontario, Canada 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvarez-Cobelas M., Cirujano S. and Sanchez-Carrillo S. 2001. Hydrological and botanical man-made changes in the Spanish wetland of Las Tablas de Daimiel. Biological Conservation 97: 89–98.Google Scholar
  2. APHA 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewaters, 19th edi tion. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Bedford B.L., Walbridge M.R. and Aldous A. 1999. Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80: 2151–2169.Google Scholar
  4. Bendell-Young L. and Pick F.R. 1997. Base cation composition of pore water, peat and pool water of fifteen Ontario peatlands: Implications for peatland acidification. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 96: 155–173.Google Scholar
  5. Benoit M. and Fizaine G. 1999. Quality of water in forest catchment areas. Revue Forestiere Francaise 50: 162–172.Google Scholar
  6. Berka C., Schreier H. and Hall K. 2001. Linking water quality with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 127: 389–401.Google Scholar
  7. Bormann F.H. and Likens G.E. 1979. Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. Springer Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Brown G.H. and Fisher N.I. 1972. Subsampling a mixture of sampled material. Technometrics 14: 663–668.Google Scholar
  9. Brunet K.C. and Astin K.B. 1997. Spatio-temporal variations in sediment nutrient levels: the River Adour. Landscape Ecology 12: 171–184.Google Scholar
  10. Carter M.R. 1993. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Canadian Society of Soil Science. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Castelle A.J., Johnson A.W. and Conolly C. 1994. Wetland and stream buffer size requirements: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality 23: 878–882.Google Scholar
  12. Comoleo R.E., Paul J.F., Copeland J., Baker C., Hale S.S., Latimer R.W. 1996. Relationships between watershed stressors and sediment contamination in Chesapeake Bay estuaries. Landscape Ecology 11: 307–319.Google Scholar
  13. Crosbie B. and Chow-Fraser P. 1999. Percentage land use in the watershed determines the water and sediment of 22 marshes in the Great Lakes basin. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56: 1781–1791.Google Scholar
  14. Cuffney T.F., Meador M.R., Porter S.D. and Gurtz M.E. 2000. Responses of physical, chemical, and biological indicators of water to a gradient of agricultural land use in the Yakima River, Washington. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 64: 259–270.Google Scholar
  15. Currier J.B. 1980. Evolution of nonpoint sources associated with silvicultural activities. In: Overcash M.R. and Davidson J.M. (eds), Environmental Impact Of Nonpoint Source Pollution. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Detenbeck N.E., Johnston C.A. and Niemi C.A. 1993. Wetland effects on lake water quality in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area. Landscape Ecology 8: 39–61.Google Scholar
  17. Detenbeck N.E., Taylor D.L., Lima A. and Hagley C. 1996. Temporal and spatial variability in water quality of wetlands in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN metropolitan area: Implications for monitoring strategies and designs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 40: 11–40.Google Scholar
  18. Draper N. and Smith H. 1981. Applied regression analysis. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Ecoregions Working Group 1989. Ecoclimatic Regions of Canada, First approximation. Ecological land Classification Series, No. 23. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 119 p.Google Scholar
  20. Edland S.D. and van Belle G. 1994. Decreased sampling costs and improved accuracy with composite sampling. In: Cothern C.R. and Ross N.P. (eds), Environmental Statistics, Asessment and Forecasting. CRC Press, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Ehrenfeld J.G. and Schneider J.P. 1991. Chamaecyparis-thyoides wetlands and suburbanization effects of hydrology, water quality and plant community composition. Journal of Applied Ecology 28: 467–490.Google Scholar
  22. Findlay C.S. and Houlahan J. 1997. Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conservation Biology 11: 1000–1009.Google Scholar
  23. Fulton R.J., Anderson T.W., Gadd N.R., Harrington C.R., Kettles I.M., Richard S.H., Rodriques C.G., Rust B.R. and Shilts W.W. 1987. Summary of the Quaternary of the Ottawa region in International Union for Quaternary Research XII International Congress.Google Scholar
  24. Gopal B. 1999. Natural and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment, Potentials and problems. Water Science and Technology 40: 27–35.Google Scholar
  25. Government of Canada 1991. The Federal Policy on Wetland Conservation. Ministry of Environment, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Growns J.E., Davis J.A., Cheal F., Schmidt L.G., Rosich R.S. and Bradley S.J. 1992. Multivariate pattern analysis of wetland invertebrate communities and environmental variables in western Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 17: 275–288.Google Scholar
  27. Havlin J.L., Tisdale S.L., Beaton J.D. and Nelson W.L. 1998. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers 6th edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Hefting M.M. and De Klein J.J.M. 1998. Nitrogen removal in buffer strips along a lowland stream in the Netherlands: A pilot study. Environmental Pollution 102: 521–526.Google Scholar
  29. Hensel B.R. and Miller M.V. 1991. Effects of wetlands creation on groundwater flow. Journal of Hydrology 126: 293–314.Google Scholar
  30. Hubbard R.K. and Lowrance R.R. 1994. Riparian forest buffer system research at the coastal plain experiment station, Tifton, GA. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 77: 409–432.Google Scholar
  31. Hunsaker C.T. and Levine D.A. 1995. Hierarchical approaches to the study of water quality in rivers. BioScience 45: 193–203.Google Scholar
  32. Jeppesen E., Sondergaard M., Kronvang B., Jensen J.P., Svendsen L.M. and Lauridsen T.L. 1999. Lake and catchment management in Denmark. Hydrobiologia 395-396: 419–432.Google Scholar
  33. Jofre M.B. and Karasov W.H. 1999. Direct effect of ammonia on three species of North American anuran amphibians. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18: 1806–1812.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson L.B., Richards C., Host G.E. and Arthur J.W. 1997. Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37: 193–208.Google Scholar
  35. Johnston C.A., Detenbeck N.E. and Niemi G.J. 1990. The cumulative effect of wetlands on stream water quality and quantity. Biogeochemistry 10: 105–141.Google Scholar
  36. Jones K.B., Neale A.C., Nash M.S, Van Remortel R.D., Wickham J.D., Riitters K.H., O'Neill R.V. 2001. Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic region. Landscape Ecology 16: 301–312.Google Scholar
  37. Kehew A.E., Passero R.N., Krishnamurthy R.V., Lovett C.K., Betts M.A. and Dayharsh B.A. 1998. Hydrogeochemical interaction between a wetland and an unconfined glacial drift aquifer, southwestern Michigan. Ground Water 36: 849–856.Google Scholar
  38. Kerr J.T. and Currie D.J. 1995. Effects of human activity on global extinction risk. Conservation Biology 9: 1528–1538.Google Scholar
  39. Kuusemets V. and Mander U. 1999. Ecotechnological measures to control nutrient losses from catchments. Water Science and Technology 40: 195–202.Google Scholar
  40. Kuusemets V. and Mander U. 2002. Nutrient flows and management of a small watershed. Landscape Ecology 17: 59–68.Google Scholar
  41. Legendre P. and Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology 2nd edition. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  42. Lemly A.D. and King R.S. 2000. An insect-bacteria bioindicator for assessing detrimental nutrient enrichment in wetlands. Wetlands 20: 91–100.Google Scholar
  43. Lewis W.M. 2001. Wetlands explained: wetland science, policy, and politics in America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  44. Marion G.M. 1996. Elemental mobility through small tundra watersheds. Arctic and Alpine Research 28: 339–345.Google Scholar
  45. Mason C.F., Norton S.A., Fernandez I.J. and Katz L.E. 1999. Deconstruction of the chemical effects of road salt on stream water chemistry. Journal of Environmental Quality 28: 82–91.Google Scholar
  46. McFarland A.M.S. and Hauck L.M. 1999. Relating agricultural land uses to in-stream stormwater quality. Journal of Environmental Quality 28: 836–844.Google Scholar
  47. Miller A.J. 1984. Selection of subsets of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A 147: 389–425.Google Scholar
  48. Moorhead K.K. 1999. Contiguity and edge characteristics of wetlands in five coastal counties of North Carolina, USA. Wetlands 19: 276–282.Google Scholar
  49. Nijhoff M. 1983. Handbook of Environmental Impacts of fertilizer use. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, the Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  50. Owens D.S. and Johnson G.V. 1996. Fertilizer nutrient leaching and nutrient mobility: A simple laboratory exercise. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 25: 128–131.Google Scholar
  51. Patrick W.H Jr. 1994. From wastelands to wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality 23: 892–896.Google Scholar
  52. Patty L., Real B. and Gril J.J. 1997. The use of grassed buffer strips to remove pesticides, nitrate and soluble phosphorus compounds from runoff water. Pesticide Science 49: 243–251.Google Scholar
  53. Phillips J D. 1989. Nonpoint source pollution control effectiveness of riparian forests along a coastal plain river. Journal of Hydrology 110: 221–238.Google Scholar
  54. Poiani K.A., Bedford B.L., Merrill M.D. 1996. A GIS-based index for relating landscape characteristics to potential nitrogen leeching in wetlands. Landscape Ecology 11: 237–255.Google Scholar
  55. Prairie Y.T., Peters R.H. and Bird D.F. 1995. Natural variability and the estimation of empirical relationships: A reassessment of regression methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 788–798.Google Scholar
  56. Prepas E.E., Planas D., Gibson J.J., Vitt D.H., Prowse T.D., DinsmoreW. P., Halsey L.A., McEachern P.M., Paquet S., Scrimgeour G.J., Tonn W.M., Paszkowski C.A.and Wolfstein K. 2001. Landscape variables influencing nutrients and phytoplankton communities in Boreal Plain lakes of northern Alberta: a comparison of wetland-and upland-dominated catchments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1286–1299.Google Scholar
  57. Prentki N.T., Gustafson T.D. and Adams M.S. 1978. Nutrient movement in lakeshore marshes. In: Good R.E., Whigham D.F., Simpson R.L. and Jackson C.G. Jr. (eds), Freshwater wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential, pp. 169–194. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  58. Pugh A.L.V., Norton S.A., Schauffler M., Jacobson G.L. Jr., Kahl J.S., Brutsaert W.F. and Mason C.F. 1996. Interactions between peat and salt-contaminated runoff in Alton Bog, Maine, USA. Journal of Hydrology 182: 83–104.Google Scholar
  59. Reddy K.R., Fisher M.M. and Ivanoff D. 1996. Wetland and aquatic processes: resuspension and diffusive flux of nitrogen and phosphorus in a hypereutrophic lake. Journal of Environmental Quality 25: 363–371.Google Scholar
  60. Rouse J.D., Bishop C.A. and Struger J. 1999. Nitrogen pollution: An assessment of its threat to amphibian survival. Environmental Health Perspectives 107: 799–803.Google Scholar
  61. Schultz R.C., Colletti J.P., Isenhart T.M., Simpkins W.W., Mize C.W. and Thompson M.L. 1995. Design and placement of a multi-species riparian buffer strip system. Agroforestry Systems 29: 201–226.Google Scholar
  62. Schwarz W.L., Malanson G.P. and Weirich F.H. 1996. Effect of landscape position on the sediment chemistry of abandonedchannel wetlands. Landscape Ecology 11: 27–38.Google Scholar
  63. Sharpley A.N., Chapra S.C., Wedepohl R., Sims J.T., Daniel T.C. and Reddy K.R. 1994. Managing agricultural phosphorus for protection of surface waters: Issues and options. Journal of Environmental Quality 23: 437–451.Google Scholar
  64. Spieles D.J. and Mitsch W.J. 2000. Macroinvertebrate community structure in high-and low-nutrient constructed wetlands. Wetlands 20: 716–729.Google Scholar
  65. Stelzer R.S. and Lamberti G.A. 2001. Effects of N:P ratio and total nutrient concentration on stream periphyton community structure, biomass, and elemental composition. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 356–367.Google Scholar
  66. Svengsouk L.J. and Mitsch W.J. 2001. Dynamics of mixtures of Typha latifolia and Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani in nutrientenrichment wetland experiments. American Midland Naturalist 145: 309–324.Google Scholar
  67. Tufford D.L., McKellar H.N. Jr. and Hussey J.R. 1998. In-stream nonpoint source nutrient prediction with land-use proximity seasonality. Journal of Environmental Quality 27: 100–111.Google Scholar
  68. Uri N.P. 1999. Agriculture and the environment. Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  69. Uusi-Kamppa J., Braskerud B., Jansson H., Syversen N. and Uusitalo R. 2000. Buffer zones and constructed wetlands as filters for agricultural phosphorus. Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 151–158.Google Scholar
  70. Walbridge M.R. and Richardson C.J. 1991. Water quality of pocosins and associated wetlands of the Carolina coastal plain. Wetlands 11: 417–439.Google Scholar
  71. Wang X. 2001. Integrating water-quality management and land-use planning in a watershed context. Journal of Environmental Management 61: 25–36.Google Scholar
  72. Zalidis G.C. and Gerakis A. 1999. Evaluating sustainability of watershed resources management through wetland functional analysis. Environmental Management 24: 193–207.Google Scholar
  73. Zheng G.J., Man Ben K.W., Lam J.C.W., Lam M.H.W. and Lam P.K.S. 2002. Distribution and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the sediment of a sub-tropical coastal wetland. Water Research 36: 1457–1468.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff E. Houlahan
    • 1
  • C. Scott Findlay
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of New Brunswick at Saint JohnNew BrunswickCanada(e-mail
  2. 2.Institute of EnvironmentUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations