Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 262, Issue 1, pp 205–213 | Cite as

Neutron activation and the JFK assassination, Part I. Data and interpretation

  • K. A. Rahn
  • L. M. Sturdivan
Article

Abstract

Five lead fragments from bullet cores from the assassination of American President John F. Kennedy in 1963 were analyzed twice by NAA, first by the FBI in 1964 and then by Vincent P. Guinn in 1977. Their concentrations of Sb have provided invaluable information about the number and origin of bullets that hit Kennedy and Texas Governor John B. Connally. While both analyses appeared to group the fragments into a body shot and a head shot, the FBI set contained a systematic error and Guinn's results from quarters of test bullets showed that the indicator element Sb varied enough over quarters to potentially merge the groups. The latter problem was resolved by the FBI replicate analyses, which showed that antimony was nearly homogeneos on the small scales of the fragments, and by the mechanism by which jacketed bullets break when hitting bone, which generates tiny fragments from a single break near the middle of the lead core. They collectively meant that the fragments within each group were formed on the scale of subfragments. The two groups were just as they appear because the larger quarter-bullet heterogeneities did not apply. This result substantiates Guinn's original conclusion that two and only two bullets from Lee Harvey Oswald's rifle struck the two men.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    FBI memo of 11 June 1979 from a irJWKlI to the House Select Committee on Assassinations, 5H66.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    FBI memo of 11 June 1979 from a irJWKli to the House Select Committee on Assassinations, 5H71-72.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. R. Lukens, V. P. Guinn, J. Forensic Sci., 16 (1971) 301.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    From an internal FBI memo of 6 July 1964 from R. H. JEVONS to a Mr. CONRAD.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. P. Guinn, Ibid.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. R. Lukens, V. P. Guinn, J. Forensic Sci. 16 (1971) 301. H. R. Lukens, H. L. Schlesinger, V. P. Guinn, R. P. Hackleman, Forensic Neutron activation Analysis of Bullet-Lead Specimens, U.S. AEC Report GA-10141, 48 pages, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. E. Hoover, letter of 8 July 1964 to J. L. RANKIN, General Counsel of the Warren Commission, reproduced in full on page 607 of Harold Weisberg™s Post Mortem, Harold WEISBERG, Frederic, MD, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. P. Guinn, M. A. Purcell, J. Radioanal. Chem., 39 (1977) 85.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. P. Guinn, Anal. Chem., 51 (1979) 484A.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. R. Lukens, V. P. Guinn, J. Forensic Sci., 16 (1971) 301.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. P. Guinn, Ibid.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. P. Guinn, Ibid.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. P. Guinn, Ibid.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Milam, “Blakey's , 'Linchpin': Dr. Guinn, Neutron Activation Analysis, and the Single Bullet Theory,”, August 1994. This manuscript now appears on the Internet at http://www.assassinationweb.com/issue4.htm. Although it retains the message of the original 1994 document, some of the strongest statements have been deleted.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    From Table II-C, Appendix F, of GUINN's report to the HSCA, HSCA Volume I, p. 549.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publisher/Akadémiai Kiadó 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. A. Rahn
    • 1
  • L. M. Sturdivan
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of OceanographyUniversity of Rhode Island NarragansettUSA
  2. 2.LMS Scientific Models 47 Estambre RoadSanta FeUSA

Personalised recommendations