Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 293–306

An Exploratory Study of Youth Mentoring in an Urban Context: Adolescents' Perceptions of Relationship Styles

  • Regina Day Langhout
  • Jean E. Rhodes
  • Lori N. Osborne
Article

Abstract

The goal of this study was to empirically distinguish a range of mentor relationships and to evaluate their differential influence on adolescent outcomes. The study makes use of data that were collected as part of a national evaluation of Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America. The evaluation included 1138 youth, ranging in age from 10 through 16 (M=12.25), who were assigned randomly to either a mentoring relationship or a control group and followed for 18 months. A series of analyses, based on the matched youth's accounts of the relationships, suggested 4 distinct types of relationships (i.e., moderate, unconditionally supportive, active, and low-key). The 4 groups tended to distinguish themselves from one another on the basis of perceived support, structure, and activity. Relative to the controls, youth who characterized their mentor relationships as providing moderate levels of both activity and structure and conditional support derived the largest number of benefits from the relationships. These included improvements in social, psychological, and academic outcomes. Implications of the findings for research and intervention are discussed.

youth mentoring mentoring relationship styles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am. Psychol. 47: 1597-1611.Google Scholar
  2. Arendell, T. (1997). A social constructionist approach to parenting. In Arendell, T. (ed.), Contemporary Parenting: Challenges and Issues. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  3. Armsden, G. C., and Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA): Relationship to well-being in adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 16: 427-454.Google Scholar
  4. Aseltine, R. H., Dupre, M. and Lamlein, P. (2000). Mentoring as a drug prevention strategy: An evaluation of across ages. Adolesc. Fam. Health 1: 11-20.Google Scholar
  5. Baumrind, D. (1968). Authoritarian vs. authoritative parental control. Adolescence 3: 255-272.Google Scholar
  6. Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Dev. Psychol. Monogr. 4: P. 2.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Zur, H. (2003). Happy adolescents: The link between subjective well-being, internal resources, and parental factors. J. Youth Adolesc. 32: 67-79.Google Scholar
  8. Berndt, T., and Perry, B. (1986). Children's perceptions of friendships as supportive relationships. Dev. Psychol. 22: 640-648.Google Scholar
  9. Berndt, T., and Miller, K. (1986). Expectancies, values, and achievement in junior high school. J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 319-326.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson., W. S., II, Redner, R., Blakely, C. H., Mitchell, C. M., and Esmhoff, J. G. (1987). Diversion of juvenile offenders: An experimental comparison. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 55: 68-75.Google Scholar
  11. Darling, N., Hamilton, S. F., and Niego, S. (1994). Adolescents' relations with adults outside the family. In Montemayor, R., and Adams, G. R. (eds.), Personal Relationships During Adolescence. Advances in Adolescent Development: An Annual Book Series, (Vol. 6). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 216-235.Google Scholar
  12. DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., and Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 30: 157-197.Google Scholar
  13. DuBois, D. L., and Neville, H. A. (1997). Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits. J. Commun. Psychol. 25: 227-234.Google Scholar
  14. Freedman, M. (1993). The Kindness of Strangers. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  15. Grossman, J. B., and Rhodes, J. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 30: 199-219.Google Scholar
  16. Grossman, J. B., and Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Program. Eval. Rev. 22: 402-425.Google Scholar
  17. Harter, S. (1986). Cognitive–developmental processes in the integration of concepts about emotions and the self. Special Issue: Developmental perspectives on social–cognitive theories. Soc. Cogn. 4: 119-151.Google Scholar
  18. Harter, S. (1985). Competence as a dimension of self-evaluation: Toward a comprehensive model of self-worth. In Leahy, R. L. (ed.), The Development of the Self. Academic Press, New York, pp. 55-121.Google Scholar
  19. Helsen, M., Vollebergh, W., and Meeus, W. (2000). Social support from parents and friends and emotional problems in adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 29: 319-335.Google Scholar
  20. Hoff-Ginsberg, E., and Tardiff, T. (1995). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 161-187.Google Scholar
  21. Holmbeck, G. N., Paikoff, R. L., and Brooks-Gunn, J. (1995). Parenting adolescents. In Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 91-118.Google Scholar
  22. Howard, G. S., Nance, D. W., and Myers, P. (1986). Adaptive counseling and therapy: An integrative, eclectic model. Couns. Psychol. 14: 363-442.Google Scholar
  23. Jarrett, R. L. (1995). Growing up poor: The family experiences of socially mobile youth in low-income African American neighborhoods. J. Adolesc. Res. 10: 111-135.Google Scholar
  24. Jarrett, R. L. (1999). Successful parenting in high-risk neighborhoods. Future Chil. 9: 45-50.Google Scholar
  25. Jordan, J. (1991). The meaning of mutuality. In Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., and Surrey, J. L. (eds.), Women's Growth in Connection. Guilford Press, New York, pp. 81-96.Google Scholar
  26. Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D., duToit, S., and du Toit, M. (2001). LISREL 8: New Statistical Features. Scientific Software International, Chicago.Google Scholar
  27. Laible, D. J., Carol, G., and Raffaelli, M. (2000). The differential relations of parent and peer attachment to adolescent adjustment. J. Youth Adolesc. 29: 45-59.Google Scholar
  28. Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., and Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Dev. 62: 1049-1065.Google Scholar
  29. Linnehan, F. (2001). The relation of a work-based mentoring program to the academic performance and behavior of African American students. J. Vocat. Behav. 59: 310-325.Google Scholar
  30. LoSciuto, L., Rajala, A. K., Townsend, T. N., and Taylor, A. S. (1996). An outcome evaluation across ages: An intergenerational mentoring approach to drug prevention. J. Adolesc. Res. 11: 116-129.Google Scholar
  31. Luescher, K., and Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent–child relations in later life. J. Marriage Fam. 60: 413-445.Google Scholar
  32. Mason, C. A., Cauce, A. M., Gonzales, N., and Hiraga, Y. (1994). An ecological model of externalizing behaviors in African American adolescents: No family is an island. J. Res. Adolesc. 4: 639-655.Google Scholar
  33. McKenna, T. (1998, June). Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America: A view from the national level. Paper presented at the Commonwealth Fund's Invited Conference on the State and Future of Mentoring Symposium, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. McPartland, J. M., and Nettles, S. M. (1991). Using community adults as advocates or mentors for at-risk middle school students: A two-year evaluation of Project RAISE. Johns Hopkins Univ. Center Res. Eff. Sch. Disadvantaged Stud. 17: 1-12.Google Scholar
  35. Mitchell, C. M., Kantrowitz, R. E., and Davidson, W. S., II (1980). Differential attitude change in nonprofessional experience: An experimental comparison. J. Counsel. Psychol. 27: 625-629.Google Scholar
  36. Morrow, K. V., and Styles, M. B. (1995). Building Relationships With Youth in Program Settings: A Study of Big Brothers Big Sisters. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  37. Portes, P. R., Dunham, R. M., and Williams, S. (1986). Assessing child-rearing style in ecological settings: Its relation to culture, social class, early age intervention and scholastic achievement. Adolescence 83: 723-731.Google Scholar
  38. Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand By Me: The Risks and Rewards of Mentoring Today's Youth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Sipe, C. L. (1998). Mentoring adolescents: What have we learned? In Grossman, J. B. (ed.), Contemporary Issues in Mentoring. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia, pp. 24-47.Google Scholar
  40. Steinberg, L., Darling, N., and Fletcher, A. (1995). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment: An ecological journey. In Moen, P., Elder, G. H., Jr., and Luescher, K. (eds.), Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 423-466.Google Scholar
  41. Styles, M. B., and Morrow, K. V. (1992). Understanding How Youth and Elders Form Relationships: A Study of Four Linking Lifetime Programs. Public/Private Ventures, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  42. van Wel, F., Linsen, H., and Abma, R. (2000). The perental bond and the well-being of adolescents and young adults. J. Youth Adolesc. 29: 307-318.Google Scholar
  43. Wilkinson, L., Engelman, L., Corter, J., and Coward, M. (1996). Cluster analysis. In Wilkinson, L. (ed.), SYSTAT 6.0 for Windows. SPSS, Chicago, pp. 333-360.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Regina Day Langhout
    • 1
  • Jean E. Rhodes
    • 2
  • Lori N. Osborne
    • 3
  1. 1.Psychology atWesleyan UniversityMiddletown
  2. 2.Psychology at theUniversity of MassachusettsBoston
  3. 3.Illinois Masonic Medical CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations