Journal of Mammalian Evolution

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 143–202 | Cite as

Polarities in Mammalian Evolution Seen Through Homologs of the Inner Cell Mass

  • Jason A. Lillegraven

Abstract

Embryogenetic pathways differ markedly among monotremes, marsupials, and placentals, and their analysis provides information of fundamental importance to recognition of mammalian evolutionary directions. The cap of cuboidal cells of the marsupial late unilaminar blastocyst, generally known as the “embryonic area,” probably is induced to form (prior to origin of Hensen's node) by signals from earliest hypoblastic cells (“anterior visceral endoderm”). The thickened cap is a “medullary plate” of sauropsid terminology because it includes epiblastic cells presumptive to neurectoderm (including neural crest), Hensen's node, primitive streak, and gut endoderm. The remainder of the definitive embryo (i.e., parts of epidermal origin, including ectodermal placodes) derives from squamous ectoderm (surrounding the medullary plate) of the blastocyst's ill-named “trophoblastic area.” Amniotic ectoderm develops farther distally within the “trophoblastic area.” The autapomorphic inner cell mass (ICM) of placental mammals is homologous to medullary plate of the marsupial blastocyst plus morphologically undefined, proximal parts of surrounding ectoderm (of the “trophoblastic area”). Considerations of early cell lineages in marsupials are greatly affected by recognition that the boundary between future embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues does not match the margin of the medullary plate (i.e., “embryonic area”). Marsupials and monotremes largely conform to sauropsid early embryogenesis, but placentals express, at earliest developmental stages, innovations unique within Amniota that are linked to early establishment of the brain. Neonatal marsupials and hatchling monotremes are extremely altricial and closely comparable anatomically/physiologically; they share a temporal pattern in combining early morphogenesis of craniofacial features (related to suckling) with deferral of telencephalic completion into postnatal/posthatching life. Placentals contrast greatly in establishing the central nervous system prior to rudiments of the cranial skeleton and associated musculature, and they complete essentials of forebrain development before birth. Comparative evidence from transitory periderm suggests that primordial eutherians had extremely altricial hatchlings or newborns, whichever was the mode of early development. Details remain unknown about the origin of the unique specialization of ICM plus encapsulating trophoblast from the more generalized blastula of ancestral synapsids.

embryology evolution Marsupialia Monotremata Placentalia trophoblast 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Archibald, J. D., and Deutschman, D. H. (2001). Quantitative analysis of the timing of the origin and diversification of extant placental orders. J. Mammal. Evol. 8:107–124.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, G. R. de, and Fell, W. A. (1936). The development of the Monotremata. Part III. The development of the skull of Ornithorhynchus. Zool. Soc. Lond. Trans. 23:1–43.Google Scholar
  3. Beneden, E. van (1875). La maturation de l'oeuf, la fécondation, et les premières phases du développement embryonnaire des mammifères d'après des recherches faites chez le Lapin. Acad. Roy. Belg. Bull. Cl. Sci. 2ième ser. 40:686–736.Google Scholar
  4. Billington, W. D., and Bell, S. C. (1983). Immunobiology of mouse trophoblast. In: Biology of Trophoblast, Y.W. Loke and A. Whyte, eds., pp. 571–595, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Blackburn, D. G. (1992). Convergent evolution of viviparity, matrotrophy, and specializations for fetal nutrition in reptiles and other vertebrates. Amer. Zool. 32:313–321.Google Scholar
  6. Blackburn, D. G. (1998). Viviparity and oviparity: Evolution and reproductive strategies. In: Encyclopedia of Reproduction, Vol. 4, E. Knobil and J. D. Neill, eds., pp. 994–1003, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Blackburn, D. G., Hayssen, V., and Murphy, C. J. (1989). The origins of lactation and the evolution of milk: A review with new hypotheses. Mammal. Rev. 19:1–26.Google Scholar
  8. Blackburn, D. G., Taylor, J. M., and Padykula, H. A. (1988). Trophoblast concept as applied to therian mammals. J. Morphol. 196:127–136.Google Scholar
  9. Bluntschli, H. (1938). Le développement primaire et l'implantation chez un centetiné (Hemicentetes). C. R. Assoc. Anat. 33:39–46.Google Scholar
  10. Caldwell, W. H. (1887). Embryology of Monotremata and Marsupialia. Part I. Roy. Soc. Lond. Philos. Trans. 178B: 463–486.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, R. L. (2001). The origin and early radiation of terrestrial vertebrates. J. Paleontol. 75:1202–1213.Google Scholar
  12. Cedard, L., and Firth, A. (eds.) (1992). Placental Signals: Autocrine and Paracrine Control of Pregnancy, Trophoblast Research Vol. 6, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
  13. Cifelli, R. L. (2001). Early mammalian radiations. J. Paleontol. 75:1214–1226.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, C. T., and Smith, K. K. (1993). Cranial osteogenesis in Monodelphis domestica (Didelphidae) and Macropus eugenii (Macropodidae). J. Morphol. 215:119–149.Google Scholar
  15. Coulam, C. B., Faulk, W. P., and McIntyre, J. A. (1992). Immunological Obstetrics W. W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Cruz, Y. P., Yousef, A., and Selwood, L. (1996). Fate-map analysis of the epiblast of the dasyurid marsupial Sminthopsis macroura (Gould). Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 8:779–788.Google Scholar
  17. Denker, H.-W. (1983). Cell lineage, determination and differentiation in earliest developmental stages in mammals. In: Bibliotheca Anatomica, Vol. 24, W. Lierse, ed., pp. 22–58, Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  18. Edwards, R. G., Howe, C. W. S., and Johnson, M. H. (1975). Immunobiology of Trophoblast, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Foley, A. C., Skromne, I., and Stern, C. D. (2000). Reconciling different models of forebrain induction and patterning: A dual role for the hypoblast. Development 127:3839–3854.Google Scholar
  20. Flynn, T. T., and Hill, J. P. (1939). The development of the Monotremata. IV: Growth of the ovarian ovum, maturation, fertilisation, and early cleavage. Zool. Soc. Lond. Trans. 24:445–623.Google Scholar
  21. Flynn, T. T., and Hill, J. P. (1947). The development of the Monotremata. VI: The later stages of cleavage and the formation of the primary germ-layers. Zool. Soc. Lond. Trans. 26:1–151 + 27 pls.Google Scholar
  22. Frankenberg, S., and Selwood, L. (1998). An ultrastructural study of the role of an extracellular matrix during normal cleavage in a marsupial, the brushtail possum. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 50:420–433.Google Scholar
  23. Fraser, R. C. (1954). Studies on the hypoblast of the young chick embryo. J. Exp. Zool. 126:349–399.Google Scholar
  24. Garcia-Martinez, V., Alvarez, I. S., and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1993). Locations of the ectodermal and nonectodermal subdivisions of the epiblast at stages 3 and 4 of avian gastrulation and neurulation. J. Exp. Zool. 267:431–446.Google Scholar
  25. Gaupp, E. (1908). Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und vergleichenden Morphologie des Schädels von Echidna aculeata var.typica. Denkschr. Med. Naturwiss. Ges. Jena (Semon. Zool. Forschungsreisen in Australien) 6(Pt. 2): 539–788.Google Scholar
  26. Gilbert, S. F. (1994). Developmental Biology, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Goetz, R. H. (1938). On the early development of the Tenrecoidea (Hemicentetes semispinosus). Biomorphosis 1: 67–79.Google Scholar
  28. Gribnau, A. A. M., and Geijsberts, L. G. M. (1981). Developmental stages in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 68: vi, 1–84.Google Scholar
  29. Gribnau, A. A. M., and Geijsberts, L. G. M. (1985). Morphogenesis of the brain in staged rhesus monkey embryos. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 91: viii, 1–69.Google Scholar
  30. Griffiths, M. (1968). Echidnas, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Griffiths, M. (1978). The Biology of the Monotremes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Griffiths, M., McIntosh, D. L., and Coles, R. E. A. (1969). The mammary gland of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus, with observations on the incubation of the egg and on the newly-hatched young. J. Zool. 158: 371–386.Google Scholar
  33. Harder, J. D., Stonerook, M. J., and Pondy, J. (1993). Gestation and placentation in two New World opossums: Didelphis virginiana and Monodelphis domestica. J. Exp. Zool. 266:463–479.Google Scholar
  34. Hartman, C. G. (1916). Studies in the development of the opossum Didelphis virginiana L. I. History of the early cleavage. II: Formation of the blastocyst. J. Morphol. 27:1–83.Google Scholar
  35. Hartman, C. G. (1919). Studies in the development of the opossum Didelphys virginiana L. III: Description of new material on maturation, cleavage and entoderm formation. IV. The bilaminar blastocyst. J. Morphol. 32: 1–142.Google Scholar
  36. Hartman, C. G. (1928). The breeding season of the opossum (Didelphis virginiana) and the rate of intrauterine and postnatal development. J. Morphol. 46:143–215.Google Scholar
  37. Hatada, Y., and Stern, C. D. (1994). A fate map of the epiblast of the early chick embryo. Development 120: 2879–2889.Google Scholar
  38. Hill, J. P. (1910). Contributions to the embryology of the Marsupialia, IV: The early development of the Mar-supialia, with special reference to the native cat (Dasyurus viverrinus). Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 56:1–134 + pls. 1–9.Google Scholar
  39. Hill, J. P. (1918). Contributions to the embryology of the Marsupialia. V: Some observations on the early development of Didelphys aurita. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 63:91–139 + pls. 6–9.Google Scholar
  40. Hill, J. P., and de Beer, G. R. (1949). Development of the Monotremata. Part VII: The development and structure of the egg-tooth and the caruncle in the monotremes and on the occurrence of vestiges of the egg-tooth and caruncle in marsupials. Zool. Soc. Lond. Trans. 26:503–544 + 10 pls.Google Scholar
  41. Hine, R. (ed.) (1999). The Facts on File Dictionary of Biology, 3rd edn., Checkmark Books, Facts on File, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  42. Hopson, J. A. (1994). Synapsid evolution and the radiation of non-eutherian mammals. In: Major Features of Vertebrate Evolution, Short Courses in Paleontology 7, D. R. Prothero and R. M. Schoch, eds., pp. 190–219, The Paleontological Society, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
  43. Hubrecht, A. A. W. (1889). Studies in mammalian embryology. I: The placentation of Erinaceus europaeus, with remarks on the phylogeny of the placenta. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 30:283–404 + pls. XV–XXVII.Google Scholar
  44. Hubrecht, A. A. W. (1908). Early ontogenetic phenomena in mammals and their bearing on our interpretation of the phylogeny of the vertebrates. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 53:1–181.Google Scholar
  45. Hughes, R. L. (1984). Structural adaptations of the eggs and the fetal membranes of monotremes and marsupials for respiration and metabolic exchange. In: Respiration and Metabolism of Embryonic Vertebrates, R.S. Seymour, ed., pp. 389–421, Dr W. Junk Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
  46. Hughes, R. L. (1993). Monotreme development with particular reference to the extraembryonic membranes. J. Exp. Zool. 266:480–494.Google Scholar
  47. Hughes, R. L., and Hall, L. S. (1988). Structural adaptations of the newborn marsupial. In: The Developing Marsupial: Models for Biomedical Research, C. H. Tyndale-Biscoe and P. A. Janssens, eds., pp. 8–27, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  48. Hughes, R. L., and Hall, L. S. (1998). Early development and embryology of the platypus. Roy. Soc. Lond. Philos. Trans., Ser. B 353:1101–1114.Google Scholar
  49. Janke, A., Magnell, O., Wieczorek, G., Westerman, M., and Arnason, U. (2002). Phylogenetic analysis of 18S rRNA and the mitochondrial genomes of the wombat, Vombatus ursinus, and the spiny anteater, Tachyglossus aculeatus: Increased support for the Marsupionta hypothesis. J. Mol. Evol. 54:71–80.Google Scholar
  50. Jeffery, J. E., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Coates, M. I., and Richardson, M. K. (2002). Analyzing evolutionary patterns in amniote embryonic development. Evol. Dev. 4:292–302.Google Scholar
  51. Ji, Q., Luo, Z.-X., Yuan, C.-X., Wible, J. R., Zhang, J.-P., and Georgi, J. A. (2002). The earliest known eutherian mammal. Nature 416:816–822.Google Scholar
  52. Johnson, M. H. (1996). Origins of pluriblast and trophoblast in the eutherian conceptus. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 8: 699–709.Google Scholar
  53. Johnson, M. H., and Selwood, L. (1996). Nomenclature of early development in mammals. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 8: 759–764.Google Scholar
  54. Kerr, T. (1935). Notes on the development of the germ-layers in diprotodont marsupials. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 77: 305–315.Google Scholar
  55. Kerr, T. (1936). On the primitive streak and associated structures in the marsupial Bettongia cuniculus. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 78:687–715.Google Scholar
  56. Kielan-Jaworowska, Z., Cifelli, R. L., and Luo Z.-X. (eds.) (2004). Mammals from the Age of Dinosaurs: Origins, Evolution and Structure, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Killian, J. K., Buckley, T. R., Stewart, N., Munday, B. L., and Jirtle, R. L. (2001). Marsupials and eutherians reunited: Genetic evidence for the Theria hypothesis of mammalian evolution. Genome 12:513–517.Google Scholar
  58. Kirsch, J. A. W., and Mayer, G. C. (1998). The platypus is not a rodent: DNA hybridization, amniote phylogeny and the palimpsest theory. Roy. Soc. Lond. Philos. Trans., Ser. B 353:1221–1237.Google Scholar
  59. Knoetgen, H., Teichmann, U., and Kessel, M. (1999a). Head-organizing activities of endodermal tissues in vertebrates. Cell. Mol. Biol. 45:481–492.Google Scholar
  60. Knoetgen, H., Viebahn, C., and Kessel, M. (1999b). Head induction in the chick by primitive endoderm of mammalian, but not avian origin. Development 126:815–825.Google Scholar
  61. Knoetgen, H., Teichmann, U., Wittler, L., Viebahn, C., and Kessel, M. (2000). Anterior neural induction by nodes from rabbits and mice. Dev. Biol. 225:370–380.Google Scholar
  62. Krause, W. J. (1998). A review of histogenesis/organogenesis in the developing North American opossum (Didel-phis virginiana). Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 143:1–143.Google Scholar
  63. Kuhn, H.-J. (1971). Die Entwicklung und Morphologie des Schädels von Tachyglossus aculeatus. Abh. senkenb. naturforsch. Ges. 528:1–192 +pls. 1–32.Google Scholar
  64. Kuhn, H.-J., and Zeller, U. (1987). The cavum epiptericum in monotremes and therian mammals. In: Morphogen-esis of the Mammalian Skull, H.-J. Kuhn and U. Zeller, eds., pp. 51–70, Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  65. Lillegraven, J. A. (1975). Biological considerations of the marsupial–placental dichotomy. Evolution 29:707–722.Google Scholar
  66. Lillegraven, J. A. (1985). Use of the term "trophoblast" for tissues in therian mammals. J. Morphol. 183:293–299.Google Scholar
  67. Lillegraven, J. A., Thompson, S. D., McNab, B. K., and Patton, J. L. (1987). The origin of eutherian mammals. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 32:281–336.Google Scholar
  68. Loke, Y. W., and Whyte, A. (1983). Biology of Trophoblast, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  69. Luckett, W. P., and Zeller, U. (1989). Developmental evidence for dental homologies in the monotreme Or-nithorhynchus and its systematic implications. Z. Säugetierkunde 54:193–204.Google Scholar
  70. Luo, Z.-X., Kielan-Jaworowska, Z., and Cifelli, R. L. (2002). In quest for a phylogeny of Mesozoic mammals. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 47:1–78.Google Scholar
  71. Lyne, A. G., and Hollis, D. E. (1977). The early development of marsupials, with special reference to bandicoots. In: Reproduction and Evolution, J. H. Calaby and C. H. Tyndale-Biscoe, eds., pp. 293–302, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra City.Google Scholar
  72. Maier, W. (1993). Cranial morphology of the therian common ancestor, as suggested by the adaptations of neonate marsupials. In: Mammal Phylogeny: Vol. 2. Mesozoic Differentiation, Multituberculates, Monotremes, Early Therians, and Marsupials, F. S. Szalay, M. J. Novacek, and M. C. McKenna, eds., pp. 165–181, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  73. Mate, K. E., Robinson, E. S., VandeBerg, J. L., and Pedersen, R. A. (1994). Timetable of in vivo embryonic development in the grey short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). Mol. Reprod. Dev. 39:365–374.Google Scholar
  74. McCrady, E., Jr. (1938). The embryology of the opossum. Am. Anat. Mem., Wistar Inst. Anat. Biol. 16: 233 p.Google Scholar
  75. McCrady, E., Jr. (1944). The evolution and significance of the germ layers. J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 19:240–251.Google Scholar
  76. McKenna, M. C., and Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  77. Morton, H. (1998). Early pregnancy factor: An extracellular chaperonin 10 homologue. Immunol. Cell Biol. 76: 483–496.Google Scholar
  78. Morton, H., Rolfe, B. E., McNeill, L., Clarke, P., Clarke, F. M., and Clunie, G. J. A. (1980). Early pregnancy factor: Tissues involved in its production in the mouse. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2:73–82.Google Scholar
  79. Müller, F. (1968). Die transitorischen Verschlüsse in der postnatalen Entwicklung der Marsupialia. Acta Anat. 71: 581–624.Google Scholar
  80. Nelson, J. E. (1988). Growth of the brain. In: The Developing Marsupial: Models for Biomedical Research, C.H. Tyndale-Biscoe and P. A. Janssens, eds., pp. 87–100, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  81. Novacek, M. J., Rougier, G. W., Wible, J. R., McKenna, M. C., Dashzeveg, D., and Horovitz, I. (1997). Epipubic bones in eutherian mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Nature 389:483–486.Google Scholar
  82. Nunn, C. L., and Smith, K. K. (1998). Statistical analyses of developmental sequences: The craniofacial region of marsupial and placental mammals. Amer. Nat. 152:82–101.Google Scholar
  83. Packard, G. C., Elinson, R. P., Gavaud J., Guillette, L. J., Jr., Lombardi, J., Schindler, J., Shine, R., Tyndale-Biscoe, H. C., Wake, M. H., Xavier, F. D. J., and Yaron, Z. (1989). Group report: How are reproductive systems integrated and how has viviparity evolved? In: Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates, D. B. Wake and G. Roth, eds., pp. 281–293, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  84. Patten, B. M. (1948). Embryology of the Pig, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  85. Patten, B. M. (1964). Foundations of Embryology, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  86. Penny, D., Hasegawa, M., Waddell, P. J., and Hendy, M. D. (1999). Mammalian evolution: Timing and implications from using the LogDeterminant transform for proteins of differing amino acid composition. Syst. Biol. 48: 76–93.Google Scholar
  87. Renfree, M. B. (1993). Ontogeny, genetic control, and phylogeny of female reproduction in monotreme and therian mammals. In: Mammal Phylogeny: Vol. 2. Mesozoic Differentiation, Multituberculates, Monotremes, Early Therians, and Marsupials, F. S. Szalay, M. J. Novacek, and M. C. McKenna, eds., pp. 4–20, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  88. Renfree, M. B. (1995). Monotreme and marsupial reproduction. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 7:1003–1020.Google Scholar
  89. Rich, T. H., Flannery, T. F., Trusler, P., Kool, L., van Klaveren, N. A., and Vickers-Rich, P. (2002). Evidence that monotremes and ausktribosphenids are not sistergroups. J. Vert. Paleontol. 22:466–469.Google Scholar
  90. Richardson, M. K. (1995). Heterochrony and the phylotypic period. Dev. Biol.:172412–421.Google Scholar
  91. Richardson, M. K., Hanken, J., Gooneratne, M. L., Pieau, C., Raynaud, A., Selwood, L., and Wright, G. M. (1997). There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: Implications for current theories of evolution and development. Anat. Embryol. 196:91–106.Google Scholar
  92. Roberts, C. T., and Breed, W. G. (1996). The marsupial shell membrane: An ultrastructural and immunogold localization study. Cell Tissue Res. 284:99–110.Google Scholar
  93. Roberts, C. T., Breed, W. G., and Mayrhofer, G. (1994). Origin of the oocyte shell membrane of a dasyurid marsupial: An immunohistochemical study. J. Exp. Zool. 270:321–331.Google Scholar
  94. Rose, R. W. (1989). Embryonic growth rates of marsupials with a note on monotremes: J. Zool. 218:11–16.Google Scholar
  95. Rougier, G. W., Wible, J. R., and Novacek, M. J. (1998). Implications of Deltatheridium specimens for early marsupial history. Nature 396:459–463.Google Scholar
  96. Sánchez-Villagra, M. R., Gemballa, S., Nummela, S., Smith, K. K., and Maier, W. (2002). Ontogenetic and phylogenetic transformations of the ear ossicles in marsupial mammals. J. Morphol. 251:219–238.Google Scholar
  97. Schmidt, W. (1992). The amniotic fluid compartment: The fetal habitat. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 127: 1–100.Google Scholar
  98. Schoenwolf, G. C. (1991). Cell movements in the epiblast during gastrulation and neurulation in avian embryos. In: Gastrulation: Movements, Patterns, and Molecules, R. Keller, W. H. Clark, Jr., and F. Griffin, eds., pp. 1–28, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  99. Schoenwolf, G. C. (1995). Laboratory Studies of Vertebrate and Invertebrate Embryos: Guide and Atlas of Descriptive and Experimental Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  100. Schoenwolf, G. C., and Sheard, P. (1990). Fate mapping the avian epiblast with focal injections of a fluorescent-histochemical marker: Ectodermal derivatives. J. Exp. Zool. 255:323–339.Google Scholar
  101. Selenka, E. (1887). Studien über Entwicklungsgeschichte der Theire. Bd. 4. Das Opossum (Didelphys virginiana). C. W. Kreidels Verlag, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  102. Selwood, L. (1986). The marsupial blastocyst—A study of the blastocysts in the Hill Collection. Aust.J.Zool. 34: 177–187.Google Scholar
  103. Selwood, L. (1992). Mechanisms underlying the development of pattern in marsupial embryos. In: Current Topics in Developmental Biology, Vol. 27, R. A. Pedersen, ed., pp.175–233, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  104. Selwood, L. (1994). Development of early cell lineages in marsupial embryos: An overview. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 6: 507–527.Google Scholar
  105. Selwood, L. (1996). The blastocyst epithelium is not a protoderm in dasyurid marsupials: Areviewof the evidence. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 8:711–723.Google Scholar
  106. Selwood, L. (2000). Marsupial egg and embryo coats. Cells Tissues Organs 166:208–219.Google Scholar
  107. Selwood, L., and Sathananthan, A. H. (1988). Ultrastructure of early cleavage and yolk extrusion in the marsupial Antechinus stuartii. J. Morphol. 195:327–344.Google Scholar
  108. Selwood, L., and Woolley, P. A. (1991). A timetable of embryonic development, and ovarian and uterine changes during pregnancy, in the stripe-faced dunnart, Sminthopsis macroura (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). J. Reprod. Fertil. 91:213–227.Google Scholar
  109. Smith, K. K. (1994). Development of craniofacial musculature in Monodelphis domestica (Marsupialia, Didel-phidae). J. Morphol. 222:149–173.Google Scholar
  110. Smith, K. K. (1997). Comparative patterns of craniofacial development in eutherian and metatherian mammals. Evolution 51:1663–1678.Google Scholar
  111. Smith, K. K. (2001a). Early development of the neural plate, neural crest and facial region of marsupials. J. Anat. 199: 121–131.Google Scholar
  112. Smith, K. K. (2001b). The evolution of mammalian development. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. Univ. 156: 119–135.Google Scholar
  113. Smith, K. K. (2001c). Heterochrony revisited: The evolution of developmental sequences. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73: 169–186.Google Scholar
  114. Souza, F. S. J. de, and Niehrs, C. (2000). Anterior endoderm and head induction in early vertebrate embryos. Cell Tissue Res. 300:207–217.Google Scholar
  115. Springer, M. S., Murphy, W. J., Eizrik, E., and O'Brien, S. J. (2003). Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100:1056–1061.Google Scholar
  116. Stern, C. D. (1991). Mesoderm formation in the chick embryo, revisited. In: Gastrulation: Movements, Patterns, and Molecules, R. Keller, W. H. Clark Jr., and F. Griffin, eds., pp. 29–41, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  117. Tyndale-Biscoe, H., and Renfree, M. (1987). Reproductive Physiology of Marsupials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  118. Ulinski, P. S. (1984). Thalamic projections to the somatosensory cortex of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus. J. Comp. Neurol. 229:153–170.Google Scholar
  119. Velhagen, W. A., Jr. (1997). Analyzing developmental sequences using sequence units. Syst. Biol. 46:204–210.Google Scholar
  120. Viebahn, C., Mayer, B., and Habré de Angelis, M. (1995). Signs of the principle [sic] body axes prior to primitive streak formation in the rabbit embryo. Anat. Embryol. 192:159–169.Google Scholar
  121. Voyle, R. B., Haines, B. P., Loffler, K. A., Hope, R. M., Rathjen, P. D., and Breed, W. G. (1999). Isolation and characterisation of zona pellucida A (ZPA) cDNAs from two species of marsupial: Regulated oocyte-specific expression of ZPA transcripts. Zygote 7:239–248.Google Scholar
  122. Waddington, C. H. (1952). The Epigenetics of Birds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  123. Wood, G. W. (1994). Is restricted antigen presentation the explanation for fetal allograft survival?. Immunol. Today 15: 15–18.Google Scholar
  124. Woodburne, M. O., Rich, T. H., and Springer, M. S. (2003). The evolution of tribospheny and the antiquity of mammalian clades. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28:360–385.Google Scholar
  125. Yousef, A., and Selwood, L. (1993). Embryonic development in culture of the marsupials Antechinus stuartii (Macleay) and Sminthopsis macroura (Spencer) during preimplantation stages. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 5:445–458.Google Scholar
  126. Zeller, U. (1999a). Mammalian reproduction: Origin and evolutionary transformations. Zool. Anz. 238:117–130.Google Scholar
  127. Zeller, U. (1999b). Phylogeny and systematic relations of the Monotremata: Why we need an integrative approach. Cour. Forschungsinst. Senckenb. 215:227–232.Google Scholar
  128. Zeller, U., and Freyer, C. (2001). Early ontogeny and placentation of the grey short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica (Didelphidae: Marsupialia): Contribution to the reconstruction of the marsupial morphotype. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 39:137–158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason A. Lillegraven
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Geology/Geophysics and Zoology/PhysiologyThe University of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations