Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 7–19

Ultrasound: A Window to the Womb?: Obstetric Ultrasound and the Abortion Rights Debate

  • Joanne Boucher


This paper explores the rhetoric of obstetric ultrasound technology as it relates to the abortion debate, specifically the interpretation given to ultrasound images by opponents of abortion. The tenor of the anti-abortion approach is precisely captured in the videotape, Ultrasound:A Window to the Womb. Aspects of this videotape are analyzed in order to tease out the assumptions about the (female) body and about the access to truth yielded by scientific technology (ultrasound) held by militant opponents of abortion. It is argued that the ultrasound images do not offer transparent confirmation of the ontological status of the embryo and fetus. Rather, the “window” of ultrasound is constructed through a complex combination of visual and verbal devices: ultrasound images, photographic images, verbal argument, and emotional appeal.

obstetric ultrasound fetal imagery abortion ontology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text (S. Heath, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Casper, M. J. (1998). The making of the unborn patient: A social anatomy of fetal surgery. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chuplis, C. (Producer), & Richard S. (Director). (1990). Ultrasound: A window to the womb. [Videotape]. (Available from Sound Wave Images, Inc., 2422 Harness Drive, W. Bloomfield, MI 48324).Google Scholar
  4. Duden, B. (1993). Disembodying women: Perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn (L. Hoinacki, Trans.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Sarah F. (1991). Fetal fascinations: New dimensions to the medical-scientific construction of fetal personhood. In S. Franklin, C. Lury, & J. Stacey (Eds.), Off-centre: Feminism and cultural studies (pp. 190–203). London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  6. Michaels, M. W. (1999). Fetal galaxies: Some questions about what we see. In L. M. Morgan, & M. W. Michaels (Eds.), Fetal subjects, feminist positions (pp. 113–132). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  7. Mitchell, L. M., & Georges, E. (1998). Baby's first picture: The cyborg fetus of ultrasound imaging. In R. Davis-Floyd, & J. Dunnit (Eds.), Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots (pp.105–124). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Newman, K. (1996). Fetal positions: Individualism, science, visuality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Oakley, A. (1984). The captured womb: A history of the medical care of pregnant women. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Petchesky, R. P. (1987). Foetal images: the power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. In M. Stanworth (Ed.), Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood and medicine (pp. 57–80). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. us/mission_statement.htmGoogle Scholar
  12. Taylor, J. S. (1992). The public fetus and the family car: From abortion politics to a Volvo advertisement. Public Culture, 4(2), 67–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne Boucher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of WinnipegManitobaCanada

Personalised recommendations