Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 273–280 | Cite as

Long-Term Stability in the Mating System of the Bot Fly Cuterebra austeni (Cuterebridae)

Article

Abstract

The bot fly Cuterebra austeni exhibits year-to-year consistency in its landmark-based hilltopping mating system. Flies were found on some of the same localized ridgetop perching areas that were known to be mate encounter sites 22 years previously. In both 1980 and 2002, males were drawn preferentially to locally elevated, largely vegetation-free sites. In addition, a substantial proportion of individuals exhibited site fidelity in both years, as demonstrated by their willingness to return to the site where marked after being captured and handled. In both years of observation, a smaller proportion returned the second day after marking and only 10–20% of marked males were seen on the third day. Thus males apparently have only a very limited window of opportunity to secure a given perching territory. In both years, a number of males (“residents”) succeeded in monopolizing a perching area over a substantial part of the brief morning flight period. One unexplained difference across the decades: residents appeared on a lower proportion of days of observation in 2002 than in 1980.

bot fly Cuterebra Cuterebridae mating system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

reference

  1. Alcock, J. (1981). Lek territoriality in a tarantula hawk wasp Hemipepsis ustulata (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8: 309-317.Google Scholar
  2. Alcock, J. (1984). Convergent evolution in perching and patrolling site preferences of some hilltopping insects of the Sonoran Desert. Southw. Nat. 29: 475-480.Google Scholar
  3. Alcock, J. (1984). Long-term maintenance of size variation in populations of Centris pallida (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Evolution 38: 220-223.Google Scholar
  4. Alcock, J., and Schaefer, J. E. (1983). Hilltop territoriality in a Sonoran desert bot fly (Diptera: Cuterebridae). Anim. Behav. 31: 518-525.Google Scholar
  5. Baird, C. R. (1987). Bionomics of Cuterebra austeni (Diptera: Cuterebridae) and its association with Neotoma albigula (Rodentia: Cricetidae) in the southwestern United States. J. Med. Entomol. 34: 690-695.Google Scholar
  6. Catts, E. P. (1967). Biology of a California rodent botfly Cuterebra latifrons Coquillett (Diptera: Cuterebridae). J. Med. Entomol. 4: 87-101.Google Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1988). Reproductive Success, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  8. Grant, B. S., Cook, A. D., Clarke, C. A., and Owen, D. F. (1998). Geographic and temporal variation in the incidence in melanism in peppered moth population in America and Britain. J. Hered. 89: 465-471.Google Scholar
  9. Kemp, D. J., and Alcock, J. (2003). Lifetime resource utilization, flight physiology and the evolution of contest competition in territorial insects. Am. Nat. 162: 190-201.Google Scholar
  10. Simmons, L. W., Tomkins, J. L., and Alcock, J. (2000). Can minor males of Dawson's burrowing bee, Amegilla dawsoni (Hymenoptera: Anthophorini) compensate for reduced access to virgin females through sperm competition? Behav. Ecol. 11: 319-325.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempe
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations