Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 329–352

Housing conditions and self-reported health status: A study in panel block buildings in three cities of Eastern Europe

  • X. Bonnefoy
  • M. Braubach
  • D. Krapavickaite
  • D. Ormand
  • I. Zurlyte
Article

Abstract

In the framework of a new program on housingand health, the World Health Organization hasundertaken a field survey on panel blockhousing estates in Eastern Germany, Lithuania,and Slovakia aiming at a preliminary assessmentof housing conditions in Eastern Europeancountries and their potential healthconsequences. It also aimed to highlighthousing and health problems of Eastern Europeantransition countries that may be related to thecurrent conditions of panel block housing.Based on empirical data collected from 259dwellings and 601 residents, it can beconcluded that several housing conditions dohave an impact on the health perception oftheir residents. Noise annoyance is recognizedas one of the most prevalent problems affectingresidential health and well-being. However, itproved difficult to identify an aspect havingan overall dominant influence on health.The survey clearly indicated the effect ofrehabilitation work on residentialsatisfaction, and it raised expectations thathousing improvements can lead to better health.

empirical study Germany housing and health Lithuania panel block buildings renovation residential perception residential satisfaction Slovakia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braubach, M. and Bonnefoy, X. (2001) Housing and Health: The Eastern European Challenge, Open House International, 26(2), 8–22.Google Scholar
  2. Bundesministerium für Raumordnung, Bauwesen und Städtebau (Ed) (1994) Wohnungspolitischer Umbruch in Ostdeutschland – eine Bestandsaufnahme, Federal Ministry for Spatial Planning, Construction and Urban Planning, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  3. Burridge, R. and Ormandy, D. (Eds) (1993) Unhealthy Housing: Research, Remedies and Reform, E & FN Spon, London.Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, J.R. (2000) Housing and Health Inequalities: Review and Prospects for Research, Housing Studies, 15(3), 341–366.Google Scholar
  5. European Academy of the Urban Environment (Ed) (1998) A Future for the Large Housing Estates. European Strategies for Prefabricated Housing Estates in Central and Eastern Europe, EAUE, Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. Fiedler, K. (1997) Alles über gesundes Wohnen. Wohnmedizin im Alltag, Beck, München.Google Scholar
  7. Fuller-Thomson, E., Hulchanski, J.D. and Hwang, S. (2000) The Housing/Health Relation-Ship: What Do We Know? Reviews on Environmental Health, 15(1–2), 109–133.Google Scholar
  8. Herlyn, U. and Hunger, B. (Eds) (1994) Ostdeutsche Wohnmilieus im Wandel. Eine Untersuchung ausgewählter Stadtgebiete als sozialplanerischer Beitrag zur Stadterneuerung, Stadtforschung aktuell, Vol. 47, Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. Hunger, B. (1994) Die Bedeutung großer Neubaugebiete in der Wohnungs-und Städtebaupolitik der DDR – historischer Rückblick, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 9, 595–609.Google Scholar
  10. Kalsbeek, W. and Heiss, G. (2000) Building Bridges between Populations and Samples in Epidemiological Studies, Annual Reviews of Public Health, 21(1), 147–169.Google Scholar
  11. Lawrence, R.J. (2000) Urban Health: A New Agenda?, Reviews on Environmental Health, 15(1–2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  12. Mackenbach, J.P. and Howden-Chapman, P. (2002) Houses, Neighbourhoods and Health, European Journal of Public Health, 12, 161–162.Google Scholar
  13. Open House International (2000) Towards the Refurbishment and Renovation of Large Prefabricated Housing Estates in East and Central Europe. Special Issue: Dessau Conference report, Open House International, 25(1).Google Scholar
  14. Senat, Berlin (Ed) (1992) Großsiedlungen. Montagebau in Berlin (Ost). Bestandsaufnahme und Bewertung der industriell errichteten Wohngebäude, Städtebau und Architektur, Bericht 8, Berlin.Google Scholar
  15. Rapoport, A. (1995) A Critical Look at the Concept 'Home'. In: The Home: Words, Interpretations, Meanings and Environments (Eds, Benjamin, D.N., Stea, D. and Saule, D.), Aldershot, Ashgate, pp. 25–52.Google Scholar
  16. Raw, G.J. and Hamilton, R.M. (Eds) (1995) Building Regulation and Health, Construction Research Communications, BRE, London.Google Scholar
  17. Rienhoff, O. and Leiner, F. (2000) Daten sammeln und auswerten. In: Das Public Health Buch. Gesundheit und Gesundheitswesen (Eds, Schwartz, F.W. et al.), Urban & Fischer, München, Jena, pp. 270–283.Google Scholar
  18. Thomson, H., Petticrew, M. and Douglas, M. (2003) Health Impact Assessment of Housing Improvements: Incorporating Research Evidence, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 11–16.Google Scholar
  19. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (Ed) (1976) Human Settlements in Europe. Post-war Trends and Policies, UNECE, Geneva, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (Ed) (1998) Technical and Economical Ground for Renovation of Panel Living Houses Built in 1971–1989. Report to the Ministry of Environment, VTU, Vilnius.Google Scholar
  21. Williams, A. (1998) Therapeutic Landscapes in Holistic Medicine, Social Science & Medicine, 46(9), 1193–1203.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, A. (2002) Changing Geographies of Care: Employing the Concept of Therapeutic Landscapes as a Framework in Examining Home Space, Social Science & Medicine, 55(1), 141–154.Google Scholar
  23. Yen, I.H. and Syme, S.L. (1999) The Social Environment and Health: A Discussion of the Epidemiologic Literature, Annual Reviews of Public Health, 20(1), 287–308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. Bonnefoy
    • 1
  • M. Braubach
    • 1
  • D. Krapavickaite
    • 2
  • D. Ormand
    • 3
  • I. Zurlyte
    • 4
  1. 1.World Health Organization, European Center for Environment and Health, Bonn OfficeBonnGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Mathematics and InformaticsVilnius UniversityLithuania
  3. 3.School of LawUniversity of WarwickUK
  4. 4.State Public Health CentreLithuania

Personalised recommendations