Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 305–320 | Cite as

Exploring the Public Understanding of Basic Genetic Concepts

  • Angela D. Lanie
  • Toby Epstein Jayaratne
  • Jane P. Sheldon
  • Sharon L. R. Kardia
  • Elizabeth S. Anderson
  • Merle Feldbaum
  • Elizabeth M. Petty

Abstract

It is predicted that the rapid acquisition of new genetic knowledge and related applications during the next decade will have significant implications for virtually all members of society. Currently, most people get exposed to information about genes and genetics only through stories publicized in the media. We sought to understand how individuals in the general population used and understood the concepts of “genetics” and “genes.” During in-depth one-on-one telephone interviews with adults in the United States, we asked questions exploring their basic understanding of these terms, as well as their belief as to the location of genes in the human body. A wide range of responses was received. Despite conversational familiarity with genetic terminology, many noted frustration or were hesitant when trying to answer these questions. In addition, some responses reflected a lack of understanding about basic genetic science that may have significant implications for broader public education measures in genetic literacy, genetic counseling, public health practices, and even routine health care.

genetic counseling genetic education genetic literacy public understanding of genetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Blumenthal, D., Causino, N., Chang, Y. C., Culpepper, L., Marder, W., Saglam, D., et al.(1999). The duration of ambulatory visits to physicians. J Fam Pract, 48(4), 264–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, W., Atkins, D., Gwinn, M., Guttmacher, A., Haddow, J., Lau, J., et al. (2002). Genetic test evaluation: Information needs of clinicians, policy makers, and the public. Am J Epidemiol, 156(4), 311–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, R., Evans, M., Tucker, M., Quilty, B., Dieppe, P., & Donovan, J. L. (2001). Why don't patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Epidemiol Community Health, 55 ,132–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapple, A., May, C., & Campion, P. (1995). Lay understanding of genetic disease: A British study of families attending a genetic counseling service. J Genet Couns, 4(4), 281–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, F. S. (1999). Shattuck lecture-Medical and societal consequences of the Human Genome Project. N Engl J Med, 341(1), 28–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, F. S. (2000). Human Genome Project honored by American Society of Human Genetics' Allan Award. National Human Genome Research Institute[On-line]. Available at http:// www.nhgri.nih.gov/NEWS/allan award.html Google Scholar
  9. Collins, F. S., & McKusick, V. A. (2001). Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. JAMA, 285(5), 540–544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Condit, C. (2001). What is 'public opinion' about genetics? Nat Rev Genet, 2 ,811–815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Doble, J. (1995). Public opinion about issues characterized by technological complexity and scientific uncertainty. Public Understand Sci, 4(2), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emery, J., Kumar, S., & Smith, H. (1998). Patient understanding of genetic principles and their expectations of genetic services with the NHS: A qualitative study. Commun Genet, 1 ,78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garner, R., & Kraus, C. (1981/1982). Good and poor comprehender differences in knowing and regulating reading behaviors. Educ Res Quart, 6 ,5–12.Google Scholar
  14. Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. J Exp Psychol Genet, 116(2), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Human Genetics Commission (2001). Public attitudes to human genetic information: People's panel quantitative study conducted for the Human Genetics Commission[On-line]. Available at http://www.hgc.gov.uk/business publications morigeneticattitudes.pdfGoogle Scholar
  16. Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Sci Educ, 84(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Munn, M., Skinner, P. O., Conn, L., Horsma, H. G., & Gregory, P. (1999). The involvement of genome researchers in high school science education. Genome Res, 9 ,597–607.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M. S. (1995). The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  19. Pardo, R., Midden, C., & Miller, J. D. (2002). Attitudes toward biotechnology in the European Union. J Biotechnol, 98 ,9–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Park, C. Y. (2001). News media exposure and self-perceived knowledge: The illusion of knowing. Int J Public Opin Res, 13(4), 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Reilly, P. R. (2000). Public concern about genetics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 1 ,485–506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Renner, C. H., & Renner, M. J. (2001). But I thought I knew that: Using confidence estimation as a debiasing technique to improve class performance. Appl Cogn Psychol, 15 ,23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richards, M. (1996). Lay and professional knowledge of genetics and inheritance. Public Understand Sci, 5 ,217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Richards, M., & Ponder,M. (1996). Lay understanding of genetics:Atest of a hypothesis. J Med Genet, 33(12), 1032–1036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Subramanian, G., Adams, M. D., Venter, J. C., & Broder, S. (2001). Implications of the human genome for understanding human biology and medicine. JAMA, 286(18), 2296–2307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Suther, S., & Goodson, P. (2003). Barriers to the provision of genetic services by primary care physicians: A systematic review of the literature. Genet Med, 5(2), 70–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Trumbo, S. (2000). Introducing students to the genetic information age. Am Bio Teach, 62(4), 259–261.Google Scholar
  29. Voss, G. (2000). Report to the Human Genetics Commission on public attitudes to the uses of human genetic information. Human Genetics Commission[On-line].Available at http://www.hgc.gov.uk/ business publications public attitudes.pdfGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams, M. S. (2001). Genetics and managed care: Policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics. Genet Med, 3(6), 430–435.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela D. Lanie
    • 1
  • Toby Epstein Jayaratne
    • 2
  • Jane P. Sheldon
    • 3
  • Sharon L. R. Kardia
    • 4
  • Elizabeth S. Anderson
    • 5
  • Merle Feldbaum
    • 6
  • Elizabeth M. Petty
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Human GeneticsUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  2. 2.Institute for Research on Women and GenderUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  3. 3.Department of Behavioral SciencesUniversity of Michigan – DearbornDearborn
  4. 4.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  5. 5.Departments of Philosophy and Women's StudiesUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  6. 6.Institute for Research on Women and GenderUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  7. 7.Departments of Internal Medicine and Human GeneticsUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations