Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 255–267 | Cite as

An Exploratory Study of Emotional Intelligence and Domestic Abuse

  • Jason Winters
  • Robert J. W. Clift
  • Donald G. Dutton
Article

Abstract

To date, there is no literature specifically addressing the relationship between spousal battering and emotional intelligence, a concept that captures the success, or lack thereof, of a person's functioning in their immediate environment. Forty-four men convicted of spousal assault and 76 undergraduate students completed the Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i; R. Bar-On, BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory: User's Manual, Multi-Health Systems, Inc., Toronto, 1997), the Propensity for Abusiveness Scale (PAS; D. G. Dutton, J. Fam. Violence 10(2): 203–221, 1995), and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (D. Paulhus, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 598–609, 1984; Assessing Self-Deception and Impression Management in Self-Reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding, Unpublished manual, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 1988; In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 17–59, 1991). Results of this exploratory study indicate that batterers score significantly lower than the general population on all components of EQ-i. Additionally EQ-i total and subscale scores for both samples correlate negatively and significantly with scores on PAS, suggesting that deficits in various components of emotional intelligence are related to an increase in the propensity to be abusive. Implications for batterer treatment are discussed.

domestic violence emotional intelligence EQ-i spousal abuse propensity for abusiveness treatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arias, I., and Beach, S. R. (1987). Validity of self-reports of marital violence. J. Fam. Violence 2(2): 139–150.Google Scholar
  2. Bar-On, R. (1997a). BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory: User's Manual, Multi-Health Systems, Inc., Toronto.Google Scholar
  3. Bar-On, R. (1997b). BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory: Technical Manual, Multi-Health Systems, Inc., Toronto.Google Scholar
  4. Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In Bograd, M., and Yllo, K. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Wife, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar
  5. Briere, J., and Runtz, M. (1989). The Trauma Symptoms Checklist (TSC-33): Early data on a new scale. J. Interpers. Violence 4(2): 151–163.Google Scholar
  6. Buss, D. (1994). The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Clift, R. J. W. (2001). An Exploratory Study of Stalking Behaviors and Intimate Abuse Perpetration in Young Adult Women, Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  8. Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of socially desirability independent of psychopathology. J. Consult. Psychol. 24: 349–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Daly, M., and Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide, Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. p. (1979). Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Dutton, D. G. (1994a). The origin and structure of the abusive personality. J. Pers. Dis. 8: 181–191.Google Scholar
  12. Dutton, D. G. (1994b). Behavioral and affective correlates of borderline personality organization in wife assaulters. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 17(3): 266–277.Google Scholar
  13. Dutton, D. G. (1995a). The Domestic Assault of Women, UBC Press, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
  14. Dutton, D. G. (1995b). Ascale for measuring propensity for abusiveness. J. Fam. Violence 10(2): 203–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dutton, D. G. (1998). The Abusive Personality: Violence and Control in Intimate Relationships, Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Dutton, D. G., and Hemphill, K. J. (1992). Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault. Violence Vict. 7(1): 29–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutton, D. G., Landolt, M. A., Starzomski, A., and Bodnarchuk, M. (2001). Validation of the propensity for abusiveness scale in diverse male populations. J. Fam. Violence 16(1): 59–73.Google Scholar
  18. Dutton, D. G., Saunders, K., Starzomski, A., and Bartholomew, K. (1994). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 24(15): 1367–1386.Google Scholar
  19. Dutton, D. G., and Starzomski, A. J. (1994). Psychological differences between court-referred and self-referred wife assaulters. Crim. Just. Behav.: Int. J. 21(2): 203–222.Google Scholar
  20. Fanlk, M. (1977). Men who assault their wives. In Roy, M. (ed.), Battered Women: A Psychosocial Study of Domestic Violence,VanNostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 119–126.Google Scholar
  21. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Gondolf, E. W. (1985). Anger and oppression in men who batter: Empiricist and feminist perspectives and their implications for research. Victimology 10(1–4): 311–324.Google Scholar
  23. Griffin, D. W., and Bartholomew, K. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In Bartholomew, K., and Perlman, D. (eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 5: Attachment Processes in Adulthood, Jessica Kingsley, London, pp. 17–52.Google Scholar
  24. Gunderson, J. G. (1984). Borderline Personality Disorder, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. Kennedy, L. W., and Dutton, D. G. (1989). The incidence of wife assault in Alberta. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 21(1): 40–54.Google Scholar
  26. Marshall, L. (1992). Development of the severity of violence against women scales. J. Fam. Violence 7(2): 103–121.Google Scholar
  27. Mayer, J., and Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence 17(4): 433–442.Google Scholar
  28. Mayer, J., and Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Appl. Prev. Psychol. 60: 100–111.Google Scholar
  29. Oldham, J., Clarkin, J., Appelbaum, A., Carr, A., Kernberg, P., Lotterman, A., and Haas, G. (1985). A self-report measure instru-ment for Borderline Personality Organization. In McGlashan, T. H. (ed.), The Borderline: Current Empirical Research, The Progress in Psychiatry Series, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  30. Parker, J. D. A. (2000). Emotional intelligence: Clinical and therapeutic implications. In Bar-On, R., and Parker, J. D. A. (eds.), The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 490–504.Google Scholar
  31. Paulhus, D. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 598–609.Google Scholar
  32. Paulhus, D. (1988). Assessing Self-Deception and Impression Manage-ment in Self-Reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding, Unpublished manual, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  33. Paulhus, D. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., and Wrightsman, L. S. (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 17–59.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenbaum, A., and O'Leary, D. K. (1981). Marital violence: Characteristics of abusive couples. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49, 63–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ross, M. W., Campbell, R. L., and Clayter, J. R. (1982). New inventory of measurement of parental rearing patterns: An English form of the EMBU. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 66: 499–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schulman, M. A. (1979). A survey of spousal violence against women in Kentucky. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.Google Scholar
  37. Siegel, J. M. (1986). The multidimensional anger inventory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51(1): 191–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sonkin, D. J., and Durphy, M. (1982). Learning to Live Without Violence: A Handbook for Men, Volcano Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  39. Sonkin, D. J., Martin, D., and Walker, L. E. A. (1985). The Male Batterer: A Treatment Approach, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Statistics Canada (1993). The Violence Against Women Survey,The Daily, Otta, Ministry of Industry.Google Scholar
  41. Statistics Canada. (2000). Canadian Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.statscan.ca/english/Pgdb/People/Population/demo10a. htmsGoogle Scholar
  42. Stosney, S. (1996). Empathy Development as a Treatment of Program for Male Batterers, Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Strachan, K., and Dutton, D. G. (1992). The role of power and gender in anger responses to jealousy. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22(22): 1721–1740.Google Scholar
  44. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring family conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scale. J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.Google Scholar
  45. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor/Doubleday, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
  46. Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence Vict. 4(3): 159–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tweed, R., and Dutton, D. G. (1998). A comparison of impulsive and instrumental subgroups of batterers. Violence Vict. 13(3): 217–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. United States of America Bureau of Census. (1979). National Crime Survey, U.S. Government Printing Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  49. United States of America Bureau of Census. (2001). Population and Household Economic Topics. Retrieved from http://www. census.gov/population/estimates/nation/intfile2–1.txtGoogle Scholar
  50. Wallace, B., and Nosko, A. (1993). Working with shame in the group treatment of male batterers. Int. J. Group Psychother. 43(1): 45–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Weschler, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  52. Weschler, D. (1943). Non-intellective factors in general intelligence. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 38: 100–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Winters
    • 1
  • Robert J. W. Clift
    • 1
  • Donald G. Dutton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver, British ColumbiaCanada

Personalised recommendations