Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 59–68 | Cite as

Comparison of Abuse Alleged by Same- and Opposite-Gender Litigants as Cited in Requests for Abuse Prevention Orders

  • Steve Basile
Article

Abstract

Domestic violence is commonly portrayed as something male batterers do to their female victims. Much research excludes study of female-perpetrated violence. This study develops a two-gender measure of abuse as documented by requests for protection. All nonimpounded Abuse Prevention Orders (M.G.L. c. 209A) issued in Massachusetts' Gardner District Court in the year 1997 were analyzed by gender to examine the level and types of violence alleged by plaintiffs. The level and types of violence were categorized and measured by examining Abuse Claimed Checkboxes found on each Complaint for Protection and by applying quantitative scales to affidavits, or plaintiff statements, filed as part of each request for protection. Despite widespread misconceptions that tend to minimize female abuse, examination of these court documents shows that male and female defendants, who were the subject of a complaint in domestic relation cases, while sometimes exhibiting different aggressive tendencies, measured almost equally abusive in terms of the overall level of psychological and physical aggression.

domestic violence abuse prevention order physical aggression psychological aggression sexual coercion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazawa, E., Byrne, J., Hotaling G. T., and Klein, A. (1999, July). Response to domestic violence in a pro-active court setting. (Final report presented to the National Institute of Justice). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. (NCJ No. 181427 C. 2).Google Scholar
  2. Boney-McCoy, S., Hambly, S. L., Straus, M. A., and Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). J. Fam. Issues 17(3): 283-316.Google Scholar
  3. Brush, L. D. (1990). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of families and households. Gender Soc. 4: 56-67.Google Scholar
  4. Callahan, R. A. (1994). Will the “real” battered woman please stand up? In search of a realistic legal definition of battered woman syndrome. Am. Univ. J. Gender Law. 3: 117.Google Scholar
  5. Claes, J. A., and Rosenthal, D. M. (1990). Men who batter women: A study in power. J. Fam. Violence. 5: 215-224.Google Scholar
  6. Coney, S. N., and Mackey, C. W. (1999). The feminization of domestic violence in america: The Woozle Effect goes beyond rhetoric. J. Men's Stud. 8: 45-58.Google Scholar
  7. Faigman, D. L. (1986). The battered woman syndrome and self-defense: A legal and empirical dissent. V. Law Rev. 72(1): 619-647.Google Scholar
  8. Faigman, D. L., and Wright, A. J. (1997). The battered woman syndrome in the age of science. Ariz. Law Rev. 39(1): 67-115.Google Scholar
  9. Gardner Area Health Study Report. (1996, January). Community project coordinated by Heywood Hospital in Gardner, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Gelles, R. J., and Straus, M. A. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. J. Marriage Fam., 48: 465-479.Google Scholar
  11. Gelles, R. J., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  12. Gondolf, E. W., and Fisher, E. (1988). An Alternative to Treating Learned Helplessness, Lexington, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Gondolf, E. W., Hart, B., McWilliams, J., and Stuehling, J. (1994). Court responses to petitions for civil protection orders. J. Interpers. Violence 9: 503-517.Google Scholar
  14. Gondolf, E. W., Lidz, C. W., and Mulvey, E. P. (1990). Characteristics of perpetrators of family and non-family assaults. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 41: 191-193.Google Scholar
  15. Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social issues, Praeger, New York, pp. 3-32.Google Scholar
  16. Klein, A. (1994). Re-abuse in a population of court-restrained male batterers after two years: Development of a predictive model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.) (1989). Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Saunders, D. C. (1989, November). Who Hits First and Who Hurts Most? Evidence for the Greater Victimization of Women in Intimate Relationships. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Reno, NV.Google Scholar
  19. Scanzoni, J. (1978). Sex Roles, Women's Work, and Marital Conflict, Lexington, Lexington, MA, pp. 151-166.Google Scholar
  20. Schuller, R., and Vidmar, N. (1992). Battered woman syndrome evidence in the courtroom: A review of he literature. Law Hum Behav Spec. Issue. Expert Evidence 16(3): 273-291.Google Scholar
  21. Sorenson, S. B., and Telles, C. A. (1991). Self-reports of spousal violence in a Mexican American and non-Hispanic white population. Violence Vict. 6: 3-15.Google Scholar
  22. Spang K. (1996, May 6). Grant could mean 2 new officers for city—Domestic violence the #1 issue. Gardner News pp. 1: 3.Google Scholar
  23. Stets, J. E., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 151-166.Google Scholar
  24. Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives—A major social problem. In (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence (Chap. 4), Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  25. Walker, L. (1979). The Battered Woman, Harper &; Row, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Walker, L. (1984a). The Battered Woman Syndrome, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Walker, L. (1984b). Battered women, psychology, and public policy. Am. Psychol. 39(10): 1178-1182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Basile
    • 1
  1. 1.Fatherhood CoalitionMilford

Personalised recommendations