Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 12, pp 2703–2720 | Cite as

Enhanced Invertase Activities in the Galls of Hormaphis hamamelidis



Invertases are sucrose hydrolyzing enzymes often associated with plant tissues acting as physiological sinks, and plant galls are physiological sinks. We investigated several types of invertase and their potential benefits in galls of the aphid Hormaphis hamamelidis. Invertase activities in galls differed from those in leaves throughout the growing season. Vacuolar invertase activities (per g FW) were always greater in galls than leaves. In contrast, cell wall invertase activities per g FW started low in galls, but increased with time and were greater than those in leaves after 1 month. Gall growth was most closely related to vacuolar invertase activity, whereas leaf growth was correlated with both vacuolar and cell wall invertase activities. In separate correlational studies of aphid fecundity and invertase activities, cell wall invertase activity per gall accounted for 15–21% of the variation in offspring per gall. Gall dry weight explained more of the variation in offspring per gall (34.2%) than did gall volume (17.8%), a likely indication of the importance of sink strength over the life of the gall. Increased invertase activity probably underlies the enhanced sink strength commonly observed in galls. Hormaphis hamamelidis fundatrices appear to maximize reproductive output by eliciting multiple beneficial responses from their hosts. Initial gall growth correlated positively with high vacuolar invertase activity, while later in the season aphid fecundity correlated positively with cell wall invertase activity.

Source–sink relations invertase induced responses resource manipulation herbivore offense 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahamson, W. G. and Mccrea, K. D. 1986. Nutrient and biomass allocation in Solidago altissima: Effects of two stem gallmakers, fertilization, and ramet isolation. Oecologia 68:174–180.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson, W. G., Sattler, J. F., Mccrea, K. D., and Weis, A. E. 1989. Variation in selection pressures on the goldenrod gall fly and the competitive interactions of its natural enemies. Oecologia 79:15–22.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, P. C. and Mizell, R. F. 1987. Physiological effects of galls induced by Phylloxera notabilis (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) on pecan foliage. Environ. Entomol. 16:264–268.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, W. N. 1965. β-Fructofuranosidase from grape berries. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 110:134–147.Google Scholar
  5. Bagatto, G., Paquette, L. C., and Shorthouse, J. D. 1996. Influence of galls of Phanacis taraxaci on carbon partitioning within common dandelion, Taraxacum officinale. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 79:111–117.Google Scholar
  6. Bagatto, G. and Shorthouse, J. D. 1994. Seasonal acquisition of mineral nutrients by a chalcid gall on lowbush blueberry. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 73:61–66.Google Scholar
  7. Bjorkman, C. 2000. Interactive effects of host resistance and drought stress on the performance of a gall-making aphid living on Norway spruce. Oecologia 123:223–231.Google Scholar
  8. Bulant, C., Gallais, A., Matthys-rochon, E., and Prioul, J. L. 2000. Xenia effects in maize with normal endosperm: II. Kernel growth and enzyme activities during grain filling. Crop Sci. 40:182–189.Google Scholar
  9. Burstein, M., Wool, D., and Eshel, A. 1994. Sink strength and clone size of sympatric, gall-forming aphids. Eur. J. Entomol. 91:57–71.Google Scholar
  10. Danks, H. V. 2002. Modification of adverse conditions by insects. Oikos 99:10–24.Google Scholar
  11. Dennill, G. B. 1988. Why a gall former can be a good biocontrol agent: The gall wasp Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae and the weed Acacia longifolia. Ecol. Entomol. 13:1–9.Google Scholar
  12. De Souza, A. L. T., Fernandes, G. W., Figueira, J. E. C., and Tanaka, M. O. 1998. Natural history of a gall-inducing weevil Collabismus clitellae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and some effects on its host plant Solanum lycocarpum (Solanaceae) in southeastern Brazil. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91:404–409.Google Scholar
  13. Dorschner, K. W., Ryan, J. D., Johnson, R. C., and Eikenbary, R. D. 1987. Modification of host nitrogen levels by the greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae): Its role in resistance of winter wheat to aphids. Environ. Entomol. 16:1007–1011.Google Scholar
  14. Ehness, R., Ecker, M., Godt, D. E., and Roitsch, T. 1997. Glucose and stress independently regulate source and sink metabolism and defense mechanisms via signal transduction pathways involving protein phosphorylation. Plant Cell 9:1825–1841.Google Scholar
  15. Ellis, K. J. and Morrison, J. F. 1982. Buffers of constant ionic strength for studying pH-dependent processes. Methods Enzymol. 87:405–426.Google Scholar
  16. Erasmus, D. J., Bennett, P. H., and Van Staden, J. 1992. The effects of galls induced by the gall fly Procecidochares utilis on vegetative growth and reproductive potential of crofton weed, Ageratina adenophora. Ann. Appl. Biol. 120:173–181.Google Scholar
  17. Fahrendorf, T. and Beck, E. 1990. Cytosolic and cell-wall-bound acid invertases from leaves of Urtica dioica L.: A comparison. Planta 180:237–244.Google Scholar
  18. Fay, P. A., Hartnett, D. C., and Knapp, A. K. 1996b. Plant tolerance of gall-insect attack and gall-insect performance. Ecology 77:521–534.Google Scholar
  19. Fay, P. A., Preszler, R. W., and Whitham, T. G. 1996a. The functional resource of a gall-forming adelgid. Oecologia 105:199–204.Google Scholar
  20. Formusoh, E. S., Wilde, G. E., and Reese, J. C. 1992. Reproduction and feeding behavior of greenbug biotype-E (Homoptera: Aphididae) on wheat previously fed upon by aphids. J. Econ. Entomol. 85:789–793.Google Scholar
  21. Forrest, J. M. S. 1971. The growth of Aphis fabae as an indicator of the nutritional advantage of galling to the apple aphid Dysaphis devecta. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 14:477–483.Google Scholar
  22. Grimm, W. C. 1983. The Illustrated Book of Trees. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, PA.Google Scholar
  23. Ho, L. C. 1988. Metabolism and compartmentation of imported sugars in sink organs in relation to sink strength. Annu. Rev. Plant Phys. Mol. Biol. 39:355–378.Google Scholar
  24. Inbar, M., Eshel, A., and Wool, D. 1995. Interspecific competition among phloem-feeding insects mediated by induced host-plant sinks. Ecology 76:1506–1515.Google Scholar
  25. Jankiewicz, L. S., Flich, H., and Antoszewski, M. 1970. Preliminary studies on the translocation of 14C-labeled assimilates and 32PO4 towards the gall evoked by Cynips (Diplolepis) quercus-folii L. on oak leaves. Marcellia 36:163–172.Google Scholar
  26. Karban, R. and Agrawal, A. A. 2002. Herbivore offense. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:641–664.Google Scholar
  27. Kefi, S., Pavlista, A. D., Meagher, M. M., and Read, P. E. 2000. Invertase activity as affected by cytokinin-like compounds during potato tuberization in vitro. Am. J. Pot. Res. 77:57–61.Google Scholar
  28. Kennedy, J. S. 1951. Benefits to aphids from feeding on galled and virus-infected leaves. Nature 168:825–826.Google Scholar
  29. Keutgen, N., Mukminah, F., and Roeb, G. W. 2002. Sink strength and photosynthetic capacity influence tuber development in sweet potato. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 77:106–115.Google Scholar
  30. Larew, H. G. 1982. A Comparative Anatomical Study of Galls Caused by the Major Cecidogenic Groups, with Special Emphasis on the Nutritive Tissue. PhD dissertation, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  31. Larson, K. C. and Whitham, T. G. 1991. Manipulation of food resources by a gall-forming aphid: The physiology of sink–source interactions. Oecologia 88:15–21.Google Scholar
  32. Larson, K. C. and Whitham, T. G. 1997. Competition between gall aphids and natural plant sinks: Plant architecture affects resistance to galling. Oecologia 109:575–582.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, I. F. and Walton, L. 1958. Gall-formation on Hamamelis virginiana resulting from material injected by the aphid Hormaphis hamamelidis. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 77:146–200.Google Scholar
  34. Llewelyn, M. 1982. The energy economy of fluid-feeding herbivorous insects, pp. 243–251, in J. H. Visser and A. K. Minks (Eds.). Insect–Plant Relationships. Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  35. Mckinnon, M. L., Quiring, D. T., and Bauce, E. 1999. Influence of tree growth rate, shoot size and foliar chemistry on the abundance and performance of a galling adelgid. Funct. Ecol. 13:859–867.Google Scholar
  36. Meyer, J. 1987. Plant Galls and Gall Inducers. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
  37. Miles, P. W. 1999. Aphid saliva. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 74:41–85.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, H. L., Neese, P. A., Ketring, D. L., and Dillwith, J. W. 1994. Involvement of ethylene in aphid infestation of barley. J. Plant Growth Regul. 13:167–171.Google Scholar
  39. Nyman, T. and Julkunen-Tiitto, R. 2000. Manipulation of the phenolic chemistry of willows by gall-inducing sawflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:13184–13187.Google Scholar
  40. Ohyama, A., Nishimura, S., and Hirai, M. 1998. Cloning of a cDNA of a cell wall-bound acid invertase from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and expression of soluble and cell wall-bound invertases in plants and wounded leaves of L. esculentum and L. peruvianum. Genes Genet. Syst. 73:149–157.Google Scholar
  41. Price, P. W., Fernandes, G. W., and Waring, G. L. 1987. Adaptive nature of insect galls. Environ. Entomol. 16:15–24.Google Scholar
  42. Price, P. W. and Louw, S. 1996. Resource manipulation through architectural modification of the host plant by a gall-forming weevil Urodontus scholtzi Louw (Coleoptera: Anthribidae). Afr. Entomol. 4:103–110.Google Scholar
  43. Raman, A. and Abrahamson, W. G. 1995. Morphometric relationships and energy allocation in the apical rosette galls of Solidago altissima (Asteraceae) induced by Rhopalomyia solidaginis (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Environ. Entomol. 24:635–639.Google Scholar
  44. Rehill, B. J. and Schultz, J. C. 2001. Hormaphis hamamelidis and gall size: A test of the plant vigor hypothesis. Oikos 95:94–104.Google Scholar
  45. Ruffner, H. P., Adler, S., and Rast, D. M. 1990. Soluble and wall associated forms of invertase in Vitis vinifera. Phytochemistry 5:2083–2086.Google Scholar
  46. Schaffer, A. A., Sagee, O., Goldschmidt, E. E., and Goren, R. 1987. Invertase and sucrose synthase activity, carbohydrate status and endogenous IAA levels during Citrus leaf development. Physiol. Plant. 69:151–155.Google Scholar
  47. Stiling, P. and Rossi, A. M. 1997. Experimental manipulations of top-down and bottom-up factors in a tri-trophic system. Ecology 78:1602–1606.Google Scholar
  48. Stiling, P., Rossi, A. M., Strong, D. R., and Johnson, D. M. 1992. Life-history and parasites of Asphondylia borrichiae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), a gall maker on Borrichia frutescens. Fla. Entomol. 75:130–137.Google Scholar
  49. Sturm, A. 1999. Invertases: Primary structures, functions, and roles in plant development and sucrose partitioning. Plant Physiol. 121:1–7.Google Scholar
  50. Sturm, A. and Chrispeels, M. J. 1990. cDNA cloning of carrot extracellular β-fructosidase and its expression in response to wounding and bacterial infection. Plant Cell 2:1107–1119.Google Scholar
  51. Sturm, A. and Tang, G. Q. 1999. The sucrose-cleaving enzymes of plants are crucial for development, growth and carbon partitioning. Trends Plant Sci. 4:401–407.Google Scholar
  52. Sung, S. J. S., Xu, D. P., and Black, C. C. 1989. Identification of actively filling sucrose sinks. Plant Physiol. 89:1117–1121.Google Scholar
  53. Telang, A., Sandström, J., Dyreson, E., and Moran, N. A. 1999. Feeding damage by Diuraphis noxia results in a nutritionally enhanced phloem diet. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91:403–412.Google Scholar
  54. Truernit, E., Schmid, J., Illig, J., and Sauer, N. 1996. The sink-specific and stress-regulated Arabidopsis STP4 gene: Enhanced expression of a gene encoding a monosaccharide transporter by wounding, elicitors, and pathogen challenge. Plant Cell 9:2169–2182.Google Scholar
  55. Von dohlen, C. D. and Gill, D. E. 1987. Geographic variation and evolution in the life cycle of the witch hazel leaf gall aphid, Hormaphis hamamelidis. Oecologia 78:165–175.Google Scholar
  56. Weis, A. E. and Abrahamson, W. G. 1986. Evolution of host plant manipulation by gallmakers: Ecological and genetic factors in the Solidago–Eurosta system. Am. Nat. 127:681–695.Google Scholar
  57. Whitham, T. G. 1980. The theory of habitat selection: Examined and extended using Pemphigus aphids. Am. Nat. 115:449–466.Google Scholar
  58. Williams, L. E., Lemoine, R., and Sauer, N. 2000. Sugar transporters in higher plants: A diversity of roles and complex regulation. Trends Plant Sci. 5:283–290.Google Scholar
  59. Winter, H. and Huber, S. C. 2000. Regulation of sucrose metabolism in higher plants: localization and regulation of activity of key enzymes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 19:31–67.Google Scholar
  60. Wool, D., Aloni, R., Ben-zvi, O., and Wollberg, M. 1999. A galling aphid furnishes its home with a built-in pipeline to the host food supply. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91:183–186.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pesticide Research Laboratory, Department of EntomologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations