Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 2609–2633

A Survey of Birds Odorous or Unpalatable to Humans: Possible Indications of Chemical Defense

  • Paul J. Weldon
  • John H. Rappole
Article

Abstract

We solicited information from field and museum ornithologists on the birds that they consider odorous and/or unpalatable in order to identify species that may use chemicals to deter predators. Ninety-two ornithologists from the Americas and Eastern Europe responded to our survey. Eighty genera and 10 families representing 17 orders, primarily Procellariiformes, Falconiformes, Psittaciformes, Cuculiformes, Piciformes, and Passeriformes, were cited as containing malodorous or uniquely odorous birds. Two orders (Opisthocomiformes and Trogoniformes), five families (Procellariidae, Cuculidae, Bucconidae, Picidae, and Furnriidae), and one subfamily (Drepanidinae) were reported to us as either containing many odorous species or consisting primarily of them. Thirty genera and three families representing 13 orders, primarily Passeriformes, were reported to us as unpalatable. The birds cited in our survey and those previously reported as odorous and/or unpalatable are tabulated. Our survey and review point to a number of taxa that may use chemicals to deter predators, although we acknowledge that compounds imparting aversive or unique odors or flavors may arise for a variety of reasons, e.g., as dietary by-products.

Aves birds odorous unpalatable chemical defense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1983. Check-list of North American Birds. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. ANDERSSON, C. J. 1872. Notes on the Birds of Damara Land and the Adjacent Countries of Southwest Africa, John Van Voorst, London.Google Scholar
  3. ARMSTRONG, E. 1951. Discharge of oily fluid by young fulmars. Ibis 93:245–251.Google Scholar
  4. AUSTIN, O. L., JR. 1961. Birds of the World. Golden Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. BAKER, E. C. S. 1908. The Indian Ducks and Their Allies. Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay.Google Scholar
  6. BAKER, E. C. S. 1913. Indian Pigeons and Doves. Witherby & Co., London.Google Scholar
  7. BAKER, E. C. S. 1921–1930. The Game-birds of India, Burma and Ceylon. Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay.Google Scholar
  8. BANNERMAN, D. A. 1930–1951. The Birds of Tropical West Africa. The Crown Agents for the Colonies, London.Google Scholar
  9. BELCHER, C. F. 1930. The Birds of Nyasaland. Crosby Lockwood and Son, London.Google Scholar
  10. BLANFORD, W. T. 1870. Observations on the Geology and Zoology of Abyssinia. Macmillan and Co., London.Google Scholar
  11. BOCK, W. J., and SHORT, JR., L. L. 1971. “Resin secretion” in Hemicircus (Picidae). Ibis 113:234–236.Google Scholar
  12. BOHNET, S., ROGERS, L., SASAKI, G., and KOLATTUKUDY, P. E. 1991. Estradiol induces proliferation of 3-hydroxy fatty acid diesters, the female pheromones, in the uropygial glands of male and female mallards. J. Biol. Chem. 266:9795–9804.Google Scholar
  13. BOLAM, G. 1913. Wild Life in Wales. Frank Palmer, London.Google Scholar
  14. BULLER, W. L. 1873. A History of the Birds of New Zealand. John Van Voorst, London.Google Scholar
  15. CHAPMAN, A., and BUCK, W. J. 1978. Unexplored Spain. Incafo, Madrid.Google Scholar
  16. CHUBB, C. 1916. The Birds of British Guiana. Bernard Quaritch, London.Google Scholar
  17. CLARK, L., and MASON, J. R. 1985. Use of nest material as insecticidal and anti-pathogenic agents by the European starling. Oecologica 67:169–176.Google Scholar
  18. CLARK, L., and MASON, J. R. 1988. Effect of biologically active plants used as nest material and the derived benefit to starling nestlings. Oecologica 77:174–180.Google Scholar
  19. CLARK, R. G., and WOBESER, B. K. 1997. Making sense of scents: Effects of odour on survival of simulated duck nests. J. Avian Biol. 28:31–37.Google Scholar
  20. CLAYTON, D. H., and VERNON, J. G. 1993. Common grackle anting with lime fruit and its effect on ectoparasites. Auk 110:951–952.Google Scholar
  21. COTT, H. B. 1945a. The edibility of birds. Nature 156:736–737.Google Scholar
  22. COTT, H. B. 1945B. Fair fowl and foul fare. Wine and Food 48:198–204.Google Scholar
  23. COTT, H. B. 1947. The edibility of birds: Illustrated by five years' experiments and observations (1941–1946) on the food preferences of the hornet, cat and man; and considered with special reference to the theories of adaptive coloration. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 116:371–524.Google Scholar
  24. COTT, H. B. 1964. Palatability of birds and eggs, pp. 589–591, in A. L. Thomson (ed.). A New Dictionary of Birds, T. Nelson, London.Google Scholar
  25. COTT, H. B., and BENSON, C. W. 1970. The palatability of birds, mainly based upon observations of a tasting panel in Zambia. Ostrich Suppl. 8:357–384.Google Scholar
  26. CUNNINGHAM, R. O. 1868. Letter to editor. Ibis 4:122–129.Google Scholar
  27. CUTRIGHT, P. R. 1940. The Great Naturalists Explore South America. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  28. DAVIS, D. E. 1940. Social nesting habits of Guira guira. Auk 57:472–484.Google Scholar
  29. DIAMOND, J. M. 1992. Rubbish birds are poisonous. Nature 360:19–20.Google Scholar
  30. DIAMOND, J. M. 1994. Stinking birds and burning books. Nat. Hist. 94(2):4–12.Google Scholar
  31. DIXON, C. 1900. The Game Birds and Wild Fowl of the British Islands. Pawson & Brailsford, London.Google Scholar
  32. DUFFEY, E. 1951. Field studies on the fulmar Fulmaris glacialis. Ibis 93:237–245.Google Scholar
  33. DUMBACHER, J. P., BEEHLER, B. M., SPANDE, T. F., GARRAFFO, H. M., and DALY, J. W. 1992. Homobatrachotoxin in the genus Pitohui: Chemical defense in birds? Science 258:799–801.Google Scholar
  34. ERHLICH, P. R., DOBKIN, D. S., and WHEYE, D. 1986. The adaptive significance of anting. Auk 103:835.Google Scholar
  35. ESCALANTE, P., EMANUEL, V., and DALY, J. W. 1994. Alkaloids in extracts of feathers of the red warbler. J. Ornithol. 135:410.Google Scholar
  36. GIBSON, E. 1920. Further ornithological notes from the neighborhood of Cape San Antonio, Province of Buenos Ayres. Part III. Phoenicopteridae—Rheidae. Ibis 2(11): 1–97.Google Scholar
  37. GILLIARD, E. T. 1958. Living Birds of the World. Doubleday & Co., Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
  38. GLENDINING, J. L. 1993. Pitohui: How toxic and to whom? Science 259:582.Google Scholar
  39. GODMAN, F. D. C. 1907–1910. A Monograph of the Petrels (Order Tubinares). Witherby & Co., London.Google Scholar
  40. GOODMAN, S. M., and HOBBS, J. J. 1990. Cross-cultural and historical comparisons in the palatability of several Egyptian bird species. J. Ethnobiol. 10:43–57.Google Scholar
  41. GÖTMARK, F. 1994. Are bright birds distasteful? A re-analysis of H. B. Cott's data on the edibility of birds. J. Avian Biol. 25:184–197.Google Scholar
  42. GRAJAL, A., STRAHL, S. D., PARRA, R., DOMINGUEZ, M. G., and NEHER, A. 1989. Foregut fermentation in the hoatzin, a neotropical leaf-eating bird. Science 245:1236–1238.Google Scholar
  43. GRINNELL, J., BRYANT, H. C., and STORER, T. I. 1918. The Game Birds of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  44. HENSHAW, H. W. 1902. Birds of the Hawaiian Islands, Being a Complete List of the Birds of the Hawaiian Possessions with Notes on Their Habits. Thos. G. Thrum, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  45. HERBERT, H. W. 1873. American Game in Its Seasons. G. E. Woodward, New York.Google Scholar
  46. HORSBRUGH, B. 1912. The Game-birds & Water-fowl of South Africa. Witherby & Co. London.Google Scholar
  47. HUBBARD, R. 1907. Ornamental Waterfowl: A Practical Manual on the Acclimatization of the Swimming Birds, with Reference to Two Hundred Species. Walsall, London.Google Scholar
  48. HUME, A. O., and MARSHALL, C. H. T. 1879. The Game Birds of India, Burmah, and Ceylon. A. O. Hume and C. H. T. Marshall, Calcutta.Google Scholar
  49. JACKSON, F. J. 1938. The Birds of Kenya Colony and the Uganda Protectorate. Gurney and Jackson, London.Google Scholar
  50. JACOB, J. 1982. Stomach oils, pp. 325–340, in D. S. Farner, J. R. King, and K. C. Parkes, (eds.). Avian Biology, Vol. 6. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. JACOB, J., and ZISWILER, V. 1982. The uropygial gland, pp. 199–324, in D. S. Farner, J. R. King, and K. C. Parkes (eds.). Avian Biology, Vol. 6. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  52. KEAR, J. 1963. The production of offensive excreta by nesting wildfowl. 14th Annu. Rep. Wildfowl Trust 1961–62:162–164.Google Scholar
  53. KIRKE, H. 1898. Twenty-five Years in British Guiana. S. Low, Marston & Co., London.Google Scholar
  54. LAYARD, E. L., and SHARPE, R. B. 1875–1884. The Birds of South Africa. Bernard Quaritch, Picadilly.Google Scholar
  55. LEES, J. 1950. Stomach oil in fulmars. Ibis 92:152–153.Google Scholar
  56. LLOYD, L. 1867. The Game Birds and Wild Fowl of Sweden and Norway. Frederick Warne, and Co., London.Google Scholar
  57. MACPHERSON, H. A. 1897. A History of Fowling. David Douglas, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  58. MAJNEP, I. S., and BULMER, R. 1977. Birds of My Kalam Country. Auckland University Press, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  59. MARSHALL, G. A. K. 1902. Five years' observations and experiments (1896–1901) on the bionomics of South African insects, chiefly directed to the investigation of mimicry and warning colours. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. London 1902:287–584.Google Scholar
  60. MATHEWS, G. M. 1914–1915. The Birds of Australia. Witherby & Co., London.Google Scholar
  61. MC LACHLAN, G. R., and LIVERSIDGE, R. 1971. Roberts Birds of South Africa. Cape and Transvaal Printers, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  62. MEINERTZHAGEN, R. 1930. Nicoll's Birds of Egypt. H. Rees, London.Google Scholar
  63. MEINERTZHAGEN, R. 1940. Autumn in Central Morocco. Part II. Ibis 4:187–234.Google Scholar
  64. MEINERTZHAGEN, R. 1951. Desert colouration. Proc. 10th Int. Ornithol. Congr. 1950:155–162.Google Scholar
  65. MILLAIS, J. G. 1902. The Natural History of the British Surface-feeding Ducks. Longmans, Green, and Co., London.Google Scholar
  66. MORRIS, B. R. 1897. British Game Birds and Wildfowl. Groombridge and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  67. MOURITSEN, K. N., and MADSEN, J. 1994. Toxic birds: Defence against parasites? Oikos 69:357–358.Google Scholar
  68. MURPHY, R. C. 1936. Oceanic Birds of South America. The American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
  69. NAUMANN, J. F. 1905. Naturgeschichte der Vogel Mitteleuropas. Fr. Eugen Köhler, Gera-Untermhaus.Google Scholar
  70. PERKINS, R. C. L. 1893. Notes on collecting in Kona, Hawaii. Ibis 5(6): 101–112.Google Scholar
  71. PERKINS, R. C. L. 1895. Notes on some Hawaiian birds. Ibis 1(7): 117–129.Google Scholar
  72. PERKINS, R. C. L. 1901. An introduction to the study of the Drepanididae, a family of birds peculiar to the Hawaiian Islands. Ibis l(8):562–585.Google Scholar
  73. PERKINS, R. C. L. 1903. Fauna Hawaiiensis or the Zoology of the Sandwich (Hawaiian) Isles, Vol. 1, Pt. IV, Vertebrata. University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  74. PETERS, J. L. 1931–1986. Check-list of the Birds of the World. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  75. PHILLIPS, J. C. 1922–1926. A Natural History of the Ducks. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  76. POULSEN, B. O. 1994. Poison in pitohui birds: Against predators or ectoparasites? Emu 94:128–129.Google Scholar
  77. PRATT, A. E. 1906. Two Years among New Guinea Cannibals. Seeley, London.Google Scholar
  78. PRATT, H. D. 1992a. Is the Poo-uli a Hawaiian honeycreeper (Drepanidinae)? Condor 94:172–180.Google Scholar
  79. PRATT, H. D. 1992b. Systematics of the Hawaiian “creepers” Oreomystis and Paroreomyza. Condor 94:836–846.Google Scholar
  80. REA, A. M. 1983. Cathartid affinities: A brief overview, pp. 26–54, in S. R. Wilbur, and J. A. Jackson (eds.). Vulture Biology and Management. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  81. SELBY, P. J. 1825–1833. Illustrations of British Ornithology. W. H. Lizars, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  82. SICK, H. 1993. Birds in Brazil. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  83. SIMMONS, K. E. L. 1966. Anting and the problem of self-stimulation. J. Zool. London 149:145–162.Google Scholar
  84. SIMON, A. L. 1981. A Concise Encyclopedia of Gastronomy. Overlook Press, Woodstock, New York.Google Scholar
  85. SIMSON, F. B. 1884. Notes on the pink-headed duck (Anas caryophyllacea). Ibis 2(5):271–275.Google Scholar
  86. SNOW, D. W. 1961. The natural history of the oilbird, Stealornis caripensis, in Trinidad, W.I. Part I. General behavior and breeding habits. Zoologica 46:27–48.Google Scholar
  87. STARK, A., and SCLATER, W. L. 1906. The Birds of South Africa, Vol. IV. Game-birds, Shore-birds and Sea-birds. R. H. Porter, London.Google Scholar
  88. SWENNEN, C. 1968. Nest protection of eiderducks and shovelers by means of faeces. Ardea 56:248–258.Google Scholar
  89. SWENNEN, C. 1974. Observations on the effect of ejection of stomach oil by the fulmar Fulmaris glacialis on other birds. Ardea 62:111–117.Google Scholar
  90. SWYNNERTON, C. F. M. 19l6a. The coloration of the mouths and eggs of birds. I. The mouths of birds. Ibis 10:264–294.Google Scholar
  91. SWYNNERTON, C. F. M. 19l6b. The coloration of the mouths and eggs of birds. II. On the coloration of eggs. Ibis 10:529–606.Google Scholar
  92. TEMPLE, S. A. 1994. Foul fowl. Living Bird 13:11–14.Google Scholar
  93. THIBAULT, J.-C., and HOLYOAK, D. T. 1978. Vocal and olfactory displays in the petrel genera Bulweria and Pierodroma. Ardea 66:53–56.Google Scholar
  94. THIOLLAY, J. M. 1991. Foraging, home range use and social behaviour of a group-living rainforest raptor, the red-throated caracara Daptrius americanus. Ibis 133:382–393.Google Scholar
  95. THOMAS, B. T. 1996. Family Opisthocomidae (hoatzin), pp. 24–32, in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliot, and J. Sargatal (eds.). Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 3, Hoatzin to Auks. Ediciones, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  96. THOMSON, A. L. 1964. Odour, pp. 550, in A. L. Thomson (ed.). A New Dictionary of Birds, T. Nelson, London.Google Scholar
  97. VAURIE, C. 1973. So fair and foul a bird. Nat. Hist. 82(6):60–65.Google Scholar
  98. WARHAM, J. 1977. The incidence, functions and ecological significance of petrel stomach oils. Proc. N.Z. Ecol. Soc. 24:84–93.Google Scholar
  99. WARHAM, J. 1990. The Petrels: Their Ecology and Breeding Systems. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  100. WARHAM, J., WATTS, R., and DAINTY, R. J. 1976. The composition, energy content and function of the stomach oils of petrels (order, Procellariiformes). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 23:1–13.Google Scholar
  101. WELTY, J. C., and BAPTISTA, L. 1988. The Life of Birds. Saunders College Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  102. WILSON, A., and BONAPARTE, C. L. 1871. American Ornithology. Porter & Coates, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  103. WOOD, J. G. 1862. The Illustrated Natural History, Birds. Routledge. Warne,& Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  104. YARRELL, W. 1884–1885. A History of British Birds. John Van Voorst, London.Google Scholar
  105. YOUNG, C. G. 1888. On the habits and anatomy of Opisthocomus cristatus, Illig. Notes Leyden Mus. 10:169–175.Google Scholar
  106. ZIEGLER, A. P. 1971. The strange case of the look-alike birds. Animals (London) 13:736–737.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul J. Weldon
    • 1
  • John H. Rappole
    • 1
  1. 1.Conservation and Research CenterSmithsonian InstitutionFront Royal

Personalised recommendations