Modeling Patient Decision-Making: The Role of Base-Rate and Anecdotal Information
Guidelines for managing patient–physician relationships often stem from either paternalistic or shared decision-making perspectives. Despite a number of advantages shown for the shared decision-making model, questions remain as to whether lay people make the most optimal decisions about their health care. This study explored the influence of anecdotal and base-rate information on health-care decisions. Three hundred and seventeen undergraduates read two vignettes describing a fictitious disease, followed by a description of two potential treatment protocols. The comparison treatment was 50% effective and accompanied by an anecdote that described a patient whose treatment resulted in an ambiguous outcome. A second treatment was presented as 30, 50, 70, or 90% effective, and accompanied by an anecdote that described a patient whose treatment resulted in a positive, ambiguous, or negative outcome. Subjects weighted anecdotal information more heavily than base-rate, or statistical, information when the anecdotal information was clearly positive or negative. Subjects presented with ambiguous anecdotal information weighed base-rate information most heavily. Implications for enhancing patient decision-making are discussed.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Deber, R. B. (1994). Physicians in health care management: The patient-physician partnership: Changing roles and the desire for information. Canadian Medical Association, 151 ,171–176.Google Scholar
- Kahneman,D., & Tversky,A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80 ,237–251.Google Scholar
- Moyer, A., & Solovey, P. (1998). Patient participation in treatment decision making and the psychological consequences of breast cancer surgery. Women's Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy,4 ,103–116.Google Scholar
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 6 ,105–110Google Scholar