Journal of Oceanography

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 219–225 | Cite as

Application of Atomic Force Microscopy to Observation of Marine Bacteria

  • Tomohiko Nishino
  • Eiko Ikemoto
  • Kazuhiro Kogure
Article

Abstract

The atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a recently developed, bench-top instrument that can image the surface structures of biological specimens at high resolution with simultaneous measurement of their size. This paper describes the application of AFM to marine bacteria. Both natural and cultured bacteria were retained on a filter or placed on glass, washed, air-dried and observed by AFM. The instrumental condition, the choice of suitable filter, effect of fixation and filtration, comparison with epifluorescent microscopic (EFM) count, and the size and shape of bacterial cells were investigated. An Isopore filter was best for concentration and subsequent observation because of its surface flatness. Cross section images showed that both rod and coccoid cells were flattened, the former usually having a two-humped shape. Bacterial cells were differentiated from non-living particles based on their cross section shape and size. Bacterial counts by AFM and EFM showed good agreement. Although size measurement is easily done by the instrument, AFM tends to overestimate the size of microspheres. More work is thus needed on the size measurement of living organisms. Because AFM easily provides images of natural bacterial cells at high magnification, it can be used as a new tool to study the fine structures of marine bacteria.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) marine bacteria cell size 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amro, N. A., L. P. Kotra, K. Wadu-Mesthrige, A. Bulychev, S. Mobashery and G. Liu (2000): High-resolution atomic force microscopy studies of the Escherichia coliouter membrane: structural basis for permeability. Langmuir, 16, 2789–2796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binnig, G., C. F. Quate and C. Gerber (1986): Atomic force microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 930–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørnsen, P. K. (1986): Automatic determination of bacterioplankton biomass by image analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 51, 1199–1204.Google Scholar
  4. Bolshakova, A. V., O. I. Kiselyova, A. S. Filonov, O. Y. Frolova, Y. L. Lyubchenko and Y. IV. Bolshakova (2001): Comparative studies of bacteria with an atomic force microscopy operating in different modes. Ultramicroscopy, 86, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braga, P. C. and D. Ricci (1998): Atomic force microscopy: application to investigation of Escherichia colimorphology before and after exposure to cefodizime. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 42, 18–22.Google Scholar
  6. Bratbak, G. (1985): Bacterial biovolume and biomass estimations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 49, 1488–1493.Google Scholar
  7. Dufrêne, Y. F. (2002): Atomic force microscopy, a powerful tool in microbiology. J. Bacteriol., 184, 5205–5213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fagerbakke, K. M., M. Heldal and S. Norland (1996): Content of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus in native aquatic and cultured bacteria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 10, 15–27.Google Scholar
  9. Fukuda, H. and I. Koike (2000): Feeding currents of particleattached nanoflagellates-A novel mechanism for aggregation of submicron particles. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 202, 101–112.Google Scholar
  10. Koike, I., S. Hara, K. Terauchi and K. Kogure (1990): Role of sub-micrometre particles in the ocean. Nature, 345, 242–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, S. and J. A. Fuhrman (1987): Relationships between biovolume and biomass of naturally derived marine bacterioplankton. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 53, 1298–1303.Google Scholar
  12. Loferer-Krößbacher, M., J. Klima and R. Psenner (1998): Determination of bacterial cell dry mass by transmission electron microscopy and densitometric image analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64, 688–694.Google Scholar
  13. Nagata, T. (1986): Carbon and nitrogen content of natural planktonic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 52, 28–32.Google Scholar
  14. Nagata, T. and Y. Watanabe (1990): Carbon-and nitrogen-tovolume ratios of bacterioplankton grown under different nutritional conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 1303–1309.Google Scholar
  15. Neidhardt, F. C. and H. E. Umbarger (1996): Chemical composition of Escherichia coli. p. 13–16. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella, ed. by F. C. Neidhardt, ASM Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. Porter, K. G. and Y. S. Feig (1980): The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol. Oceanogr., 25, 943–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Psenner, R. (1990): From image analysis to chemical analysis of bacteria: A long-term study? Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 234–237.Google Scholar
  18. Ramirez-Aguilar, K. A. and K. L. Rowlen (1998): Tip characterization from AFM images of nanometric spherical particles. Langmuir, 14, 2562–2566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sieburth, J. M. (1975): Microbial Seascapes. University Park Press, Baltimore, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  20. Simon, M. and F. Azam (1989): Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 51, 201–213.Google Scholar
  21. Umeda, A., M. Saito and K. Amako (1998): Surface characteristics of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in an atomic force microscope image. Microbiol. Immunol., 42, 159–164.Google Scholar
  22. Viles, C. L. and M. E. Sieracki (1992): Measurement of marine picoplankton cell size by using a cooled, charge-coupled device camera with image-analyzed fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58, 584–592.Google Scholar
  23. Woldringh, C. L., M. A. DeJong, W. V. D. Berg and L. Koppes (1977): Morphological analysis of the division cycle of two Escherichia colisubstrains during slow growth. J. Bacteriol., 131, 270–279.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Oceanographic Society of Japan 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomohiko Nishino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eiko Ikemoto
    • 1
  • Kazuhiro Kogure
    • 1
  1. 1.Ocean Research InstituteThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.School of BionicsTokyo University of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations