Advertisement

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 91–119 | Cite as

Initiating Change in Prospective Elementary School Teachers' Orientations to Mathematics Teaching by Building on Beliefs

  • Rebecca Ambrose
Article

Abstract

Many mathematics educators have found thatprospective elementary school teachers' beliefsinterfere with their learning of mathematics.Often teacher educators consider these beliefsto be wrong or naïve and seek to challengethem so prospective teachers will reject themfor more generative beliefs. Because of theresilience of prospective teachers' beliefs inresponse to these challenges, teacher educatorscould consider alternative ways of thinkingabout and addressing beliefs, particularly thepotential of building on rather than tearingdown pre-existing beliefs. Data from anearly-field experience linked to amathematics-for-teachers course provideevidence that when prospective teachers workintimately with children, in this case tryingto teach 10-year-olds about fractions, theexperience has the intensity from which beliefscan grow. Most of the prospective teachers inthe study were surprised that mathematicsteaching was more difficult than they hadanticipated. They began to consider theimportance of providing children time to thinkwhen solving mathematical problems. The changedescribed in the study is incremental ratherthan monumental, suggesting that building uponprospective teachers' existing beliefs will bea gradual process.

field experience mathematics pre-service teacher education prospective teachers' beliefs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ambrose, R. (2002, April). They all hate math: Getting beyond our stereotypes of prospective elementary school teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers' understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 132–144.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 241–247.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., Franke, M., Levi, L. & Empson, S. (1999). Children's mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  5. Document/index.htmGoogle Scholar
  6. Feiman-Nemser, S. & Buchmann, M. (1986). The first year of teacher preparation: Transition to pedagogical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18, 239–256.Google Scholar
  7. Feiman-Nemser, S., McDiarmid, G.W., Melnick, S. & Parker, M. (1988). Changing beginning teachers' conceptions: A study of an introductory teacher education course. East Lansing: National Center for Research on Teacher Education and Department of Teacher Education, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  8. Fenstermacher, G. (1979). A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher education. In L.S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 6, pp. 157–185). Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.Google Scholar
  9. Gellert, U. (2000). Mathematics instruction in safe space: Prospective elementary teachers' views of mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 251–270.Google Scholar
  10. Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goldstein, L. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the co-construction of mind. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 647–673.Google Scholar
  12. Goodman, J. (1988). Constructing a practical philosophy of teaching: A study of prospective teachers' professional perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 121–137.Google Scholar
  13. Green, T.F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  15. Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 160–189.Google Scholar
  16. Hollingsworth, S. (1992). Learning to teach through collaborative conversation: A feminist approach. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 373–404.Google Scholar
  17. Howes, E.V. (2002). Learning to teach science for all in the elementary grades: What do preservice teachers bring? Journal of Research in Science teaching, 39, 845–869.Google Scholar
  18. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Mack, N. (1995). Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 422–443.Google Scholar
  20. Mathematical Sciences Education Board (2001). Knowing and learning mathematics for teaching: Proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  21. McDiarmid, G.W., Ball, D.L. & Anderson, C.W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn't really work: Subject specific pedagogy. In M.C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 193–206). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  22. McLaughlin, H.J. (1991). Reconciling care and control: Authority in classroom relationships. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 182–195.Google Scholar
  23. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317–328.Google Scholar
  24. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.Google Scholar
  25. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Simon, M., Tzur, R., Heinz, K., Kinzel, M. & Smith, M.S. (2000). Characterizing a perspective underlying the practice of mathematics teachers in transition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 579–601.Google Scholar
  28. Stofflett, R. & Stoddart, T. (1992, April). Patterns of assimilation and accommodation in traditional and conceptual change teacher education course. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  29. Weinstein, C.S. (1989). Teacher education students' preconceptions of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 4, 31–40.Google Scholar
  30. Weinstein, C.S. (1990). Prospective elementary teachers' beliefs about teaching: Implications for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 279–290.Google Scholar
  31. Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J. & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.Google Scholar
  32. Worthy, J. & Patterson, E. (2001). “I can't wait to see Carlos!”: Situated learning and personal relationships with students. Journal of Literacy Research, 33(2), 303–344.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca Ambrose
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California-DavisDavisUSA, E-mail

Personalised recommendations