Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 39, Issue 19, pp 5939–5949 | Cite as

Designing for ultrahigh-temperature applications: The mechanical and thermal properties of HfB2, HfC x , HfN x and αHf(N)

  • E. Wuchina
  • M. Opeka
  • S. Causey
  • K. Buesking
  • J. Spain
  • A. Cull
  • J. Routbort
  • F. Guitierrez-Mora


The thermal conductivity, thermal expansion, Young's Modulus, flexural strength, and brittle-plastic deformation transition temperature were determined for HfB2, HfC0.98, HfC0.67, and HfN0.92 ceramics. The mechanical behavior of αHf(N) solid solutions was also studied. The thermal conductivity of modified HfB2 exceeded that of the other materials by a factor of 5 at room temperature and by a factor of 2.5 at 820°C. The transition temperature of HfC exhibited a strong stoichiometry dependence, decreasing from 2200°C for HfC0.98 to 1100°C for HfC0.67 ceramics. The transition temperature of HfB2 was 1100°C. Pure HfB2 was found to have a strength of 340 MPa in 4 point bending, that was constant from room temperature to 1600°C, while a HfB2 + 10% HfC x had a higher room temperature bend strength of 440 MPa, but that dropped to 200 MPa at 1600°C. The data generated by this effort was inputted into finite element models to predict material response in internally heated nozzle tests. The theoretical model required accurate material properties, realistic thermal boundary conditions, transient heat transfer analysis, and a good understanding of the displacement constraints. The results of the modeling suggest that HfB2 should survive the high thermal stresses generated during the nozzle test primarily because of its superior thermal conductivity. The comparison the theoretical failure calculations to the observed response in actual test conditions show quite good agreement implying that the behavior of the design is well understood.


Thermal Boundary Condition Heat Transfer Analysis Displacement Constraint Transient Heat Transfer Bend Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. OKAMOTO, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. 11(2) (1990) 146.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. JOHANSSON, J. SUNDGREN and U. HELMERSON, J. Appl. Phys. 58(8) (1985) 3112.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. RUANO and G. ELSSNER, J. Less Comm. Met. 52 (1977), 153.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. RUDY and S. WINDISCH, Tech Rep. AFML-TR-65-2 (1966) p. 1.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. KUBASCHEWSKI-VON GOLDBECK, “Phase Diagrams” (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1981).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. R. FENTER, SAMPE Quarterly 2(3) (1971) 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. KAUFMAN and E. V. CLOUGHERTY, AFML-RTD-TDR-63-4096 (1963).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. F. WILEY, W. R. MANNING and O. HUNTER, J. Less Comm. Met. 18 (1969) 149.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. RUDY, AFML-TR-65-2 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. B. BERKOWITZ-MATTUCK J. Electrochem. Soc. 113(9) (1968) 908.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. C. TRIPP and H. C. GRAHAM, J. Electrochem. Soc. (Solid State Sc.) 118(7) (1971) 1195.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. C. GRAHAM et al., in Proceedings of the Sixth University Conference on Ceramic Science, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dec. 7/9, 1970, Materials Science Research, Vol. 5 (Plenum Press, New York, 1971) p. 35.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. V. CLOUGHERTY, AFML-TR-68-190 (1968).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. C. TRIPP, H. H. DAVIS and H. C. GRAHAM, Ceram. Bull. 52(8) (1973) 612.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. J. RASKY, J. D. BULL and H. K. TRAN, in the 15th Conference on Metal Matrix, Carbon, and Ceramic Composites (1991) p. 153.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. G. TALMY, E. J. WUCHINA and J. A. ZAYKOSKI, “Ceramic Matrix Composites” (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. L. ROUTBORT, Acta Metall. 30 (1982) 663.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. J. PERRY, Powder Metall. Intern. 19(1) (1987) 29.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. P. HIRTH and J. LOTHE, “Theory of Dislocations” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. CARSLAW and J. JAEGER, “Conduction of Heat in Solids” (Oxford University Press, London, 1959) p. 112.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. TIMOSHENKO, “Strength of Materials, Part II, Advanced Theory and Problems” (Kreiger, Huntington, NY, 1976).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. SHAPIRO, “The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Gas Flow” (Ronald Press, New York, 1953) p. 88.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. BARTZ, Jet Propulsion 27 (1957) 49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Wuchina
    • 1
  • M. Opeka
    • 1
  • S. Causey
    • 2
  • K. Buesking
    • 3
  • J. Spain
    • 2
  • A. Cull
    • 2
  • J. Routbort
    • 4
  • F. Guitierrez-Mora
    • 5
  1. 1.Naval Surface Warfare CenterW. BethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Southern Research InstituteBirminghamUSA
  3. 3.Materials Research & DesignPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Argonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA
  5. 5.University of SevilleSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations