Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 57–78 | Cite as

Orchestrating Complex Educational Change: Local Reorganisation of Schools in England

  • Mike Wallace
Article

Abstract

This paper considers how complex educationalchange may be managed through the `metatask' oforchestration, narrowly distributed amongsenior formal leaders within and betweendifferent administrative levels of large publiceducation systems. Orchestration impliessteering the change process by organising andmaintaining oversight of an intricate array ofcoordinated tasks. It is the over-arching`complex change management theme' of ahierarchically ordered typology derivedinductively from a national study ofdistrict-wide initiatives to close or mergeschools so as to reduce spare student capacityand improve the quality of educationalprovision. The paper explores patterns revealedby this research relating to orchestration. Theresearch design and methods are outlined. Therelationship is clarified between the conceptsof orchestration, leadership and management. Ananalytical model is built-up for analysingcomplex educational change along threedimensions: change management themes, headed byorchestration; characteristics of thecomplexity of the change with managementimplications; and stages of the change process.The constituents of each dimension in turn aredescribed, briefly illustrated throughreference to reorganisation, and linked withorchestration. Characteristics of complexitydictated the response of orchestration and thesubordinate complex change management themesacross the different stages of the changeprocess. The analytical model is offered as aconceptual framework for future research thatwould test its wider applicability and as apractical planning tool. The importance isunderlined of developing generic yetcontext-sensitive practical guidance thatreflects the degree of complexity faced byorchestrators charged with managingcontemporary educational change.

change management themes characteristics of complexity complex educational change leadership and management orchestration reorganisation of schools stages of change 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  3. Bolman, L. & Deal, T. (1991). Reframing Organisations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H. & Beresford, J. (2000). Leading Schools in Times of Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Encarta (2001). Encarta Concise English Dictionary. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  6. Fullan, M. (2001a). Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Fullan, M. (2001b). The New Meaning of Educational Change, 3rd edn. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  8. Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration 28(3), 317-338.Google Scholar
  9. Hargreaves, A. (1983). The politics of administrative convenience: The case of middle schools. In J. Ahier & M. Flude (eds), Contemporary Education Policy. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  10. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing Leadership for Changing Times. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Louis, K.S. & Miles, M. (1990). Improving the Urban High School: What Works and Why. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. MacBeath, J. (ed) (1998). Effective School Leadership: Responding to Change. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  13. Merriam, S. (1997). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications. London: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Southworth, G. (1998). Leading Improving Primary Schools: The Work of Headteachers and deputy Heads. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  16. Starratt, R. (1995). Leaders with Vision: The Quest for School Renewal. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  17. Teacher Training Agency (1998). National Standards for Headteachers. London: TTA.Google Scholar
  18. Wallace, M. (1996a). A crisis of identity: School merger and cultural transition. British Educational Research Journal 22(4) 459-472.Google Scholar
  19. Wallace, M. (1996b). Policy interaction and policy implementation: A case of school merger under duress. Educational Management and Administration 24(3) 263-275.Google Scholar
  20. Wallace, M. (2000). Integrating cultural and political theoretical perspectives: The case of school restructuring in England. Educational Administration Quarterly 36(4) 608-632.Google Scholar
  21. Wallace, M. & Hall, V. (1994). Inside the SMT: Teamwork in Secondary School Management. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  22. Wallace, M. & Huckman, L. (1999) Senior Management Teams in Primary Schools: The Quest for Synergy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Wallace, M. & McMahon, A. (1994). Planning for Change in Turbulent Times: The Case of Multiracial Primary Schools. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  24. Wallace, M. & Pocklington, K. (1998). Realising the potential of large-scale reorganisation for promoting school improvement. Educational Management and Administration 26(3) 229-241.Google Scholar
  25. Wallace, M. & Pocklington, K. (2002). Managing Complex Educational Change: Large-Scale Reorganisation of Schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Wallace
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations