Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 355–368 | Cite as

The offshore-ring: A new system design for the open ocean aquaculture of macroalgae

  • Bela Hieronymus Buck
  • Cornelia Maria Buchholz
Article

Abstract

Mass culture of benthic macroalgae under rough offshore conditions in the North Sea requires rigid culture support systems that cannot only withstand rough weather conditions but can also be effectively handled while at the same time retain the cultured species. Various carrier constructions and different mooring systems were tested. Laminaria saccharina grew on all of these carriers with initially high (up to 14.5% per day) and later decreasing length increments. Longlines, ladder and grid systems had certain disadvantages and these are discussed. The study results led to a new ring carrier (patent pending), first used in 1994/1995, which was gradually improved until 2002. This system now emerges as being superior, since it resists not only rough weather conditions (2 m s−1 current velocity, 6 m wave height) but also permits ease of handling when compared to other constructions. The ring allows various operational modes and can be equipped with culture lines that can be collected offshore or transported to shore facilities for harvesting. The modular nature of the tested ring system lends itself for future use in integrated aquaculture systems located in or attached to offshore wind farms.

Laminaria length change length increment offshore aquaculture ring construction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BAH (2003) Time series and project data (1960-2003) at the Island of Helgoland of the Biological Institute on Helgoland (Biologische Anstalt Helgoland), URL:www.pangaea.de BSH (2002) MURSYS (Marine Environment Reporting System). Status Report 2002. Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (Bundesamt f ¨ ur Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie). Hamburg/Rostock, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. Buck BH (2002) Open Ocean Aquaculture und Offshore-Windparks: Eine Machbarkeitsstudie ¨ uber die multifunktionale Nutzung von Offshore-Windparks und Offshore-Marikultur im Raum Nord-see (Open Ocean Aquaculture and Offshore Wind farms: A feasibility study on the multifunctional use of offshore wind farms and open ocean aquaculture in the North Sea). Reports on Polar and Marine Research 412, Foundation Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven, 252 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Buck BH, Krause G, Rosenthal H, Smetacek V. (2003) Aquaculture and environmental regulations: The German situation within the North Sea. In Kirchner A (ed), International Marine Environmental Law: Institutions, Implementation and Innovation, Kluwer Law International 2003, The Hague, New York, Amsterdam, Vol. 64: 211-229.Google Scholar
  4. Buck BH, Krause G, Rosenthal H (2004) Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: The prospect of offshore co-management and legal constraints. Ocean Coastal Manag. 47(3/4): 95-122.Google Scholar
  5. CMC (2004) Cultivos Marinos del Cant´ abrico. Gij´ on, Asturias (Spain), URL: cultivosdelcantabrico.comGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman ARO, Craigie JS (1978) Seasonal growth in Laminaria longicruris: Relations with reserve carbohydrate storage and production. Mar. Biol. 46: 209-213.Google Scholar
  7. Creed JC, Kain (Jones) JM, Norton TA (1998) An experimental evaluation of density and plant size in two large brown seaweeds. J. Phycol. 34: 39-52.Google Scholar
  8. Critchley AT, Ohno M (1998). Seaweed Resources of the World. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Yokosuka. 431 pp.Google Scholar
  9. De Roeck-Holtzhauer Y (1991) Uses of seaweeds in cosmetics. In Guiry MD, Blunden G (eds), Seaweed Resources in Europe: Uses and Potential, Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 85-94.Google Scholar
  10. Dring MJ, Wagner A, Franklin LA, Kuhlenkamp R, L¨ uning K (2001) Seasonal and diurnal variations in ultraviolet-B and ultraviolet-A irradiances at and below the sea surface at Helgoland (North Sea) over a 6-year period. Helgoland Marine Research 55: 3-11.Google Scholar
  11. FAO (1998) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture (SOFIA). Food and Agriculture Organisation, United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  12. FAO (2004) FAO-Fisheries Department, Fishery Information, Data and Statistics Unit. FISHSTAT Plus.(Universal Software for fishery statistical time series). Version 2.3. last updated March 2004. Food and Agriculture Organisation. United Nations. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  13. Fei XG, Bao Y, Lu S (2000) Seaweed cultivation-Traditional way and its reformation. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 31: 575-580.Google Scholar
  14. Kain (Jones) JM (1963) Aspects of the biology of Laminaria hyper-borea. II. Age, weight, and length. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. 43, 129-151.Google Scholar
  15. Kain (Jones) JM (1979) A view of the genus Laminaria. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 17, 101-161.Google Scholar
  16. Kain (Jones) JM (1987) Seasonal growth and photoinhibition in Plo-camium cartilagineum (Rhodophyta) off the Isle of Man. Phycologia 26: 88-99Google Scholar
  17. Kain (Jones) JM, Dawes CP (1987) Useful European seaweeds: Past hopes and present cultivation. Hydrobiologia 151/152: 173-181.Google Scholar
  18. Kain (Jones) JM (1991) Cultivation of attached Seaweeds. In: Guiry MD, Blunden G (eds), Seaweed Resources in Europe: Uses and Potential, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 309-377.Google Scholar
  19. Kawashima S (1993) Cultivation of the brown alga, Laminaria "Kombu". In: Critchley AT, Ohno M (eds), Seaweed Cultivation and Marine Ranching. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Nagai, Jokosuka, Japan, pp. 25-40.Google Scholar
  20. Koehl MAR (1998) The quirks of jerks. Nature 396: 621-623.Google Scholar
  21. Krause G, Buck BH, Rosenthal H. (2003) Multifunctional use and environmental regulations: Potentials in the offshore aquaculture development in Germany. In: Proceedings of the Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Sustainable Coastal Zone Management "Rights and Duties in the Coastal Zone", 12-14 June 2003, Stockholm, Sweden, 6 pp.Google Scholar
  22. L¨uning K (1979) Growth strategies of three Laminaria species (Phaeophyceae) inhabiting different depth zones in the sublitoral region of Helgoland (North Sea). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1 (3): 195-207.Google Scholar
  23. L¨uning K (1993) Environmental and internal control of seasonal growth in seaweeds. Hydrobiologia 260/261: 1-14.Google Scholar
  24. Mann KH (1972) Ecological energetics of the sea-weed zone in a marine bay on the Atlantic coast of Canada. II. Productivity of the seaweeds. Mar. Biol. 14: 199-209.Google Scholar
  25. Mann KH (1973) Seaweeds: Their productivity and strategy for growth. Science 182: 975-981.Google Scholar
  26. McHugh DJ (2003) A Guide to the Seaweed Industry, Food and Agriculture Organisation, United Nations, Fisheries Technical Paper 441, Rome, Italy, 123 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Mittelstaedt E, Lange W, Brockmann C, Soetje KC (1983) Die Str¨ omungen in der Deutschen Bucht. Deutsches Hydrographis-ches Institut, Hamburg. 142 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Nakamoto, H (2002) Nova Scotian seaweed a delicacy in Japan: A niche market worth cultivating. Acadian Seaplants Ltd. URL:www.acadianseaplants.comGoogle Scholar
  29. Neushul M, Benson J, Harger BWW, Charters AC (1992) Macroalgal farming in the sea: Water motion and nitrate uptake. J. appl. Phycol 4: 255-265.Google Scholar
  30. Neushul M, Harger BWW (1985) Studies of biomass yield from a near-shore macroalgal test farm. J. Solar Energy Eng. 107: 93-96.Google Scholar
  31. NL ¨ O (2003) Bund/L¨ ander-Messprogramm f ¨ ur die Meeresumwelt von Nord-und Ostsee. Nieders¨ achsisches Landesamt f ¨ ur ¨ Okologie.Google Scholar
  32. Ohno M, Critchley AT (1997) Seaweed Cultivation and Marine Ranching. Second Printing. Jica, Yokosuka, Japan, 151 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Parke M (1948) Studies on British Laminariaceae. I. Growth in Laminaria saccharina (L.) Lamour. J.H. Ass. uk, 651-7.Google Scholar
  34. Perez P, Kaas R, Campello F, Arbault S, Barbaroux O (1992) La culture des algues marines dans le monde. IFREMER, Nantes.Google Scholar
  35. Provasoli L (1968) Media and prospects for the cultivation of marine algae. In: Watanabe A, Hattori A (eds), Cultures and Collections of Algae (Proc. Jap. Conf. Hakone, 1966), Jap. Soc. Plant Physiol., 63-75.Google Scholar
  36. Sandau E, Sandau P, Pulz O, Zimmermann M (1996) Heavy metal sorption by marine algae by-products. Acta Biotechnologica 16 (2-3): 103-119.Google Scholar
  37. Scoggan J, Zhimeng Z, Feijiu W (1989) Culture of Kelp (Laminaria japonica) in China. Training Manual 89/5 (RAS/86/024), prepared for the training and demonstration course on Laminaria Seafarming, 15 June-31 July 1989, Qingdao, People's Republic of China, organized by the UNDP/FAO Regional Seafarming Project.Google Scholar
  38. Smidsrød O, Christensen BE (1991) Molecular structure and physical behaviour of seaweed colloids as compared with microbial polysaccharids. In Guiry MD, Blunden G (eds), Seaweed Resources in Europe: Uses and Potential, Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 185-217.Google Scholar
  39. Stirk WA, van Staden J (2000) Removal of heavy metals from solution using dried brown seaweed material. Bot. Mar. 43(5): 467-473.Google Scholar
  40. Subandar A, Petrell RJ, Harrison PJ (1993) Laminaria culture for reduction of dissolved inorganic nitrogen in salmon farm effluent. J. appl. Phycol. 5(4): 455-463.Google Scholar
  41. Tamura T (1966) Marine Aquaculture. 2nd Edn (Translated from Japanese). Springfield, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Tseng CK (1993) Notes on mariculture in China. Aquaculture 111 (1-4): 21-30.Google Scholar
  43. Tseng CK (2001). Algal biotechnology and research activities in China. J. appl. Phycol. 13: 375-380.Google Scholar
  44. WSA (2002): Water and Shipping Authority Bremerhaven. Yearly measurements of current velocities, temperature and salinities at the surface and in 3, 6, 9 and 12 m depth. Bremerhaven, Germany.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bela Hieronymus Buck
    • 1
  • Cornelia Maria Buchholz
    • 2
  1. 1.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Am Handelshafen 12BremerhavenGermany.
  2. 2.Biological Institute on Helgoland (BAH), Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchHelgolandGermany

Personalised recommendations