Environmental Ethics Beyond Principle? The Case for a Pragmatic Contextualism

  • Ben A. Minteer
  • Elizabeth A. Corley
  • Robert E. Manning
Article

Abstract

Many nonanthropocentric environmental ethicists subscribe to a ``principle-ist'' approach to moral argument, whereby specific natural resource and environmental policy judgments are deduced from the prior articulation of a general moral principle. More often than not, this principle is one requiring the promotion of the intrinsic value of nonhuman nature. Yet there are several problems with this method of moral reasoning, including the short-circuiting of reflective inquiry and the disregard of the complex nature of specific environmental problems and policy arguments. In the present paper, we advance an alternative, pragmatic contextualist approach to environmental ethics, one grounded in the moral theory of John Dewey. We present the results of an empirical study of public environmental ethics and natural resource management attitudes to support our position, and we conclude with a few recommendations for future inquiry in the field of environmental ethics.

contextualism empirical study environmental ethics pragmatism public attitudes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Burgess, J., M. Limb, and C. Harrison, “Exploring Environmental Values Through the Medium of Focus Groups. 1. Theory and Practice,” Environment and Planning A20 (1998a), 309-326.Google Scholar
  2. Burgess, J., M. Limb, and C. Harrison, “Exploring Environmental Values Through the Medium of Focus Groups. 2. Illustrations of a Group at Work,” Environment and Planning A20 (1998b), 457-476.Google Scholar
  3. Callicott, J. B., In Defense of the Land Ethic(State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1989).Google Scholar
  4. Callicott, J. B., Beyond the Land Ethic(State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1999a).Google Scholar
  5. Callicott, J. B., “Silencing Philosophers: Minteer and the Foundations of Anti-Foundationalism,” Environmental Values8 (1999b), 499-516.Google Scholar
  6. Caspary, W., Dewey on Democracy(Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2000).Google Scholar
  7. Davies, A. “What Silence Knows-Planning, Public Participation, and Environmental Values,” Environmental Values10 (2001), 77-102.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J., Reconstruction in Philosophy(Beacon Press, Boston, 1957 (orig. 1920)).Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J., Ethics. Collected in The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol. 7, Jo Ann Boydston (ed.) (University of Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale, 1989 (orig. 1932)).Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J., Human Nature and Conduct(The Modern Library, New York, 1959 (orig. 1922)).Google Scholar
  11. Gundersen, A., The Environmental Promise of Democratic Deliberation(University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 1995).Google Scholar
  12. Katz, E., Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and Natural Community(Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 1996).Google Scholar
  13. Light, A. and E. Katz, (eds.), Environmental Pragmatism(Routledge, London, 1996).Google Scholar
  14. Manning, R., W. Valliere, and B. Minteer, “Values, Ethics, and Attitudes Toward National Forest Management: An Empirical Study,” Society and Natural Resources12 (1999), 421-436.Google Scholar
  15. Meier, K. J. and J. L. Brudney, Applied Statistics for Public Administration(Harcourt College Publishers, Fort Worth, 2002).Google Scholar
  16. Minteer, B. A., “No Experience Necessary? Foundationalism and the Retreat from Culture in Environmental Ethics,” Environmental Values7 (1998), 338-348.Google Scholar
  17. Minteer, B. A., “Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists?” Environmental Ethics22 (2001), 57-75.Google Scholar
  18. Minteer B. A., “Deweyan Democracy and Environmental Ethics,” in Minteer and Taylor (eds.), Democracy and the Claims of Nature, pp. 33-48.Google Scholar
  19. Minteer, B. A. and R. E. Manning, “Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics: Democracy, Pluralism, and the Management of Nature,” Environmental Ethics21 (1999), 191-207.Google Scholar
  20. Minteer, B. A. and R. E. Manning, “Convergence in Environmental Values: An Empirical and Conceptual Defense,” Ethics, Place and Environment3 (2000), 47-60.Google Scholar
  21. Norton, B., Toward Unity Among Environmentalists(Oxford University Press, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
  22. Norton, B., “Why I am not a Nonanthropocentrist: Callicott and the Failure of Monistic Inherentism,” Environmental Ethics17 (1995), 341-358.Google Scholar
  23. Norton, B., “The Constancy of Leopold's Land Ethic,” in A. Light and E. Katz (eds.), Environmental Pragmatism(Routledge, London, 1996), pp. 84-102.Google Scholar
  24. Norton, B., “Pragmatism, Adaptive Management, and Sustainability,” Environmental Values8 (1999), 451-466.Google Scholar
  25. Regan, T., “The Nature and Possibility of an Environmental Ethic,” Environmental Ethics3 (1981), 19-34.Google Scholar
  26. Richardson, H., “Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems,” Philosophy and Public Affairs19 (1990), 279-310.Google Scholar
  27. Rolston, III, H., “Is There an Ecological Ethic?” Ethics85 (1975), 93-109.Google Scholar
  28. Rolston, III, H., Environmental Ethics(Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1988).Google Scholar
  29. Rolston, III, H., Conserving Natural Value(Columbia University Press, New York, 1994).Google Scholar
  30. Routley, R. “Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental Ethic?” Proceedings, 15thWorld Congress of Philosophy1 (1973), 205-210.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, P. Respect for Nature(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986).Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, P. B., “Pragmatism and Policy: The Case of Water,” in A. Light and E. Katz, (eds.), Environmental Pragmatism(Routledge, London, 1996), pp. 187-208.Google Scholar
  33. Westbrook, R. B. “Pragmatism and Democracy: Reconstructing the Logic of John Dewey's Faith,” in M. Dickstein (ed.), The Revival of Pragmatism(Duke University Press, Durham, 1998), pp. 128-140.Google Scholar
  34. Weston, A., “Beyond Intrinsic Value: Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics,” Environmental Ethics7 (1985), 321-339.Google Scholar
  35. Westra, L., An Environmental Proposal for Ethics: The Principle of Integrity(Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 1994).Google Scholar
  36. Westra, L., “Why Norton's Approach is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics,” Environmental Ethics19 (1997), 279-297.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben A. Minteer
    • 1
  • Elizabeth A. Corley
    • 1
  • Robert E. Manning
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Dimensions of Biology Faculty, School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations