An Exploration of Causes of Non-Literal Language Problems in Individuals with Asperger Syndrome

  • Ingerith Martin
  • Skye McDonald


Individuals with Asperger Syndrome (AS), a high functioning variant of Autism, are often noted to possess intact language ability, yet fail to use this language capacity to engage in interactive communication. This difficulty using language in a social context has been referred to as a deficit in pragmatic language. In particular, difficulty understanding non-literal language devices, such as irony has been observed. This paper examines the veracity of two theories that have attempted to explain the causes of pragmatic language difficulties in individuals with Asperger Syndrome; the theory of Weak Central Coherence (WCC) and Social Inference theory. Fourteen young adults with AS and 24 age-matched controls were assessed on cognitive tasks measuring WCC processes, social inference or Theory of Mind ability, and the ability to interpret ironic remarks. Results indicated that the ability to understand the belief states of others is critical to understanding ironic language in AS.

Autism Asperger Syndrome Theory of Mind central coherence irony 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Attwood, T. (2000). Strategies for improving the social integration of children with Asperger syndrome. Autism, 4(1), England Asperger syndrome.Google Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 30(2), 285-297.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S. (1991). The development of a theory of mind in autism: Deviance and delay? Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14(1), 33-51.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Hey! It was just a joke! Understanding propositions and propositional attitudes by normally developing children and children with autism. Israel Journal of Psychiatry & Related Sciences, 34(3), 174-178.Google Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37-46.Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S., & Staunton, R. (1994). Do children with autism acquire the phonology of their peers? An examination of group identification through the window of bilingualism. First Language, 14(42, Pt 3), 241-248.Google Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S., & Swettenham, J. (1997). Theory of mind in autism: its relationship to executive function and central coherence. In D. J. Cohen & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders(pp. 880-893).New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., Neville, H., Doherty, S., & Jernigan, T. (1992). Language, cognition, and brain organization in a neurodevelopmental disorder. In M. R. Gunnar & C. A. Nelson (Eds.), Developmental behavioral neuroscience. The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201-232).Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Jones, W., Lai, Z., & St. George, M. (2000). The neurocognitive profile of Williams Syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (suppl.), 7-29.Google Scholar
  10. Bellugi, U., Sabo, H., & Vaid, J. (1988). Spatial deficits in children with Williams Syndrome. In J. Stiles-Davis, & M. Kritchevsky, et al. (Eds.), Spatial cognition: Brain bases and development(pp. 273-298). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Bellugi, U., Wang, P. P., & Jernigan, T. L. (1994). Williams syndrome: An unusual neuropsychological profile. In S. H. Broman & J. Grafman (Eds.), Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: Implications for brain function. (Vol. xxiii, pp. 23-56).Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Bertrand, J., Mervis, C. B., & Eisenberg, J. D. (1997). Drawing by children with Williams syndrome: A developmental perspective. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13(1), 41-67.Google Scholar
  13. Bihrle, A. M., Bellugi, U., Delis, D. C., & Marks, S. (1989). Seeing either the forest or the trees: Dissociation in visuospatial processing. Brain & Cognition, 11(1), 37-49.Google Scholar
  14. Bradshaw, J. L. (2001). Developmental disorders of the frontostriatal system: Neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, and evolutionary perspectives. UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brownell, H., & Martino, G. (1998). Deficits in inference and social cognition: The effects of right hemisphere brain damage on discourse. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello(Eds.),Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience(pp. 309-328).Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Cox, A., Klein, K., Charman, T., Baird, G., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Drew, A., & Wheelwright, S. (1999). Autism spectrum disorders at 20 and 42 months of age: Stability of clinical and ADI-R diagnosis. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 40(5), 719-732.Google Scholar
  17. Delis, D. C., Kiefner, M. G., & Friedland, A. J. (1988). Visuospatial dysfunction following brain damage: Dissociations in hierarchical and hemi-spatial analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 421-431.Google Scholar
  18. Dennis, M., Lazenby, A. L., & Lockyer, L. 2001. Inferential language in high-function children with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 31(1),US, http://www.Google Scholar
  19. Deruelle, C., Mancini, J., Livet, M. O., Casse-Perrot, C., & de Schonen, S. (1999). Configural and local processing of faces in children with Williams syndrome. Brain & Cognition, 41(3), 276-298.Google Scholar
  20. Farran, E. K., Jarrold, C., & Gathercole, S. E. (2001). Block design performance in the Williams syndrome phenotype: A problem with mental imagery? Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 42(6), 719-728.Google Scholar
  21. Fombonne, E., Bolton, P., Prior, J., Jordan, H., & Rutter, M. (1997). A family study of autism: Cognitive patterns and levels in parents and siblings. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 38(6), 667-683.Google Scholar
  22. Frith, U. (1989). Autism and Asperger syndrome. London: MRC Cognitive Development Unit.Google Scholar
  23. Frith, U., Happe, F., & Siddons, F. (1994). Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Social Development, 3(2), 108-124.Google Scholar
  24. Frith, U., & Hermelin, B. (1969). The role of visual and motor cues for normal, subnormal and autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 10(3), 153-163.Google Scholar
  25. Gallagher, H. L., Happe, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of the mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 11-21.Google Scholar
  26. Happe, F., & Frith, U. (1995). Theory of mind in autism. In Schopler & G. B. Mesibov(Eds.),Learning and cognition in autism. Current issues in autism(pp. 177-197).New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  27. Happe, F., Briskman, J., & Frith, U. (2001). Exploring the cognitive phenotype of autism: Weak “central coherence” in parents and siblings of children with autism: I. Experimental tests. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 42(3), 299-307.Google Scholar
  28. Happe, F., & Frith, U. (1996). The neuropsychology of autism. Brain, 119(4), 1377-1400.Google Scholar
  29. Happe, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and Theory of Mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101-119.Google Scholar
  30. Happe, F. G. E. (1996)Studying weak central coherence at low levels: Children with autism do not succumb to visual illusions: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 37(7), 873-877.Google Scholar
  31. Jarrold, C., Butler, D., Cottington, E., & Jiminez, F. (2000). Linking Theory of Mind and central coherence bias in autism and the general population. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 126-138.Google Scholar
  32. Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with autism and Asperger syndrome faster than normal on the Embedded Figures Test? Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 38(5), 527-534.Google Scholar
  33. Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999 a). The Strange Stories Test: A replication with high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 29(5), 395-406.Google Scholar
  34. Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999 b). A test of central coherence theory: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired? Cognition, 71(2), 149-185.Google Scholar
  35. Kaplan, J. A., Brownell, H. H., Jacobs, J. R., & Gardner, H. (1990). The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain & Language, 38(2), 315-333.Google Scholar
  36. Karmiloff-Smith, A., Klima, E., Bellugi, U., Grant, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Is there a social module? Language, face processing and theory of mind in individuals with Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(2), 196-208.Google Scholar
  37. Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., Berthoud, I., Davies, M., Howlin, P., & Udwin, O. (1997). Language and Williams syndrome: How intact is “intact”? Child Development, 68(2), 246-262.Google Scholar
  38. Kleinman, J., Marciano, P.L., & Ault, R.L. (2001). Advanced theory of mind in high-functioning adults with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 29-36.Google Scholar
  39. Krishnamurthy, K., & Joshi, M. R. (1989). The syndrome of infantile autism in siblings. Child Psychiatry Quarterly, 22(4), 107-114.Google Scholar
  40. Leboyer, M., Plumet, M.-H., Goldblum, M.-C., & Perez-Diaz, F., et al. (1995). Verbal vs. visuospatial abilities in relatives of autistic females. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11(1), 139-155.Google Scholar
  41. Mervis, C. B., Morrison, R. L., Bertrand, J., & Robinson, B. F. (1999). Williams syndrome: Findings from an integrated program of research In H., Tager-Flusberg(Ed.),Neurodevelopmental disorders: Contributions to a new framework from the cognitive neurosciences.Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Miller, J. N., & Ozonoff, S. (1997). Did Asperger's cases have Asperger disorder? A research note. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 38(2), 247-251.Google Scholar
  43. Mottron, L., & Belleville, S. (1993). A study of perceptual analysis in a high-level autistic subject with exceptional graphic abilities. Brain & Cognition, 23(2), 279-309.Google Scholar
  44. Mottron, L., Burack, J. A., Stauder, J. A. S., & Robaey, P. (1999). Perceptual processing among high functioning persons with Autism. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 40(2), 203-211.Google Scholar
  45. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.Google Scholar
  46. Ozonoff, S., & Griffith, E. M. (2000). Neuropsychological function and the external validity of Asperger syndrome. In A. Klin & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Asperger syndrome(pp. 72-96).New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ozonoff, S., & Miller, J. N. (1996). An exploration of right-hemisphere contributions to the pragmatic impairments of autism. Brain & Language, 52(3), 411-434.Google Scholar
  48. Ozonoff, S., Rogers, S. J., Farnham, J. M., & Pennington, B. F. (1993). Can standard measures identify subclinical markers of autism? Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 23(3), 429-441.Google Scholar
  49. Ozonoff, S., Rogers, S. J., & Pennington, B. F. (1991). Asperger's syndrome: Evidence of an empirical distinction from high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 32(7), 1107-1122.Google Scholar
  50. Ozonoff, S. J. (1991). Specifying the nature of the primary deficit in autism: An investigation of neuropsychological and social-cognitive abilities in high-functioning autistic children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(8-B), 4063.Google Scholar
  51. Ozonoff, S., & McEvoy, R. E. (1994). A longitudinal study of executive function and theory of mind development in autism. Development & Psychopathology, 6(3), 415-431.Google Scholar
  52. Ozonoff, S., Strayer, D. L., McMahon, W. M., & Filloux, F. (1994). Executive function abilities in autism and Tourette syndrome: An information processing approach. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 35(6), 1015-1032.Google Scholar
  53. Pani, J. R., Mervis, C. B., & Robinson, B. F. (1999). Global spatial organization by individuals with Williams syndrome. Psychological Science,10 (5).Google Scholar
  54. Pezzini, G., Vicari, S., Volterra, V., Milani, L., & Ossella, M. T. (1999). Children with Williams syndrome: Is there a single neuropsychological profile? Developmental Neuropsychology, 15(1), 141-155.Google Scholar
  55. Plaisted, K. C., Swettenham, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Children with autism show local precedence in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 40(5), 733-742.Google Scholar
  56. Prutting, C. A. (1982). Pragmatics as social competence. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 47(2), 123-134.Google Scholar
  57. Rinehart, N. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Moss, S. A., Brereton, A. V., & Tonge, B. J. (2000). A typical interference of local detail on global processing in high functioning Autism and Asperger's Disorder. Journal of Child Psychology, Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(6), 769-778.Google Scholar
  58. Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (1999). Are individuals with Autism and Asperger's Syndrome susceptible to visual illusions? Journal of Child Psychology, Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 40(8), 1238-1293.Google Scholar
  59. Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (2001). Susceptibility to illusions and performance on visuospatial tasks in individuals with autism. Journal of Child Psychology, Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 42(4), 539-549.Google Scholar
  60. Ropar, D., Mitchell, P., Mail, E., & lpxdr@psychology.nottingham, a. u. (2001). Do individuals with autism and Asperger's syndrome utilize prior knowledge when pairing stimuli. Developmental Science, 4(4), 433-441.Google Scholar
  61. Rossen, M., Klima, E. S., Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., et al. (1996). Interaction between language and cognition: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In J. H. Beitchman & N. J. Cohen(Eds.), Language, learning, and behavior disorders: Developmental, biological, and clinical perspectives (pp. 367-392). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Schmitt, J. E. (2001). Williams syndrome: Recent developments. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 14(5), 451-456.Google Scholar
  63. Snowling, M., & Frith, U. (1986). Comprehension in “hyperlexic” readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42(3), 392-415.Google Scholar
  64. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1987). Precis of relevence: Communication and cognition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 10, 697-754.Google Scholar
  65. Tager-Flusberg. (1991). Semantic processing in the free recall of autistic children: Further evidence for a cognitive deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 413-430.Google Scholar
  66. Tager-Flusberg, H. (1992). Autistic children's talk about psychological states: Deficits in the early acquisition of a theory of mind. Child Development, 63(1), 161-172.Google Scholar
  67. Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. (2000). A componential view of Theory of Mind: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognition, 76(1), 59-89.Google Scholar
  68. Teunisse, J.-P., Cools, A. R., van Spaendonck, K. P. M., Aerts, F. H. T. M., & Berger, H. J. C. (2001). Cognitive styles in high-functioning adolescents with autistic disorder. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 31 (1), US, http://www.Google Scholar
  69. Van Lancker, D., Cornelius, C., & Kreiman, J. (1989). Recognition of emotional-prosodic meaning in speech by autistic, schizophrenic and normal children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 5, 207-226.Google Scholar
  70. Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual San Antonio: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
  71. Winner, E., Brownell, H., Happe, F., Blum, A., & Pincus, D. (1998). Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of Mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain & Language, 62(1), 89-106.Google Scholar
  72. Winner, E., & Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker's second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 257-270.Google Scholar
  73. Yirmiya, N., Erel, O., Shaked, M., & Solomonica-Levi, D. (1998). Meta-analyses comparing Theory of Mind abilities of individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (3), 283-307.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingerith Martin
    • 1
  • Skye McDonald
    • 2
  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations