Information Technology and Management

, Volume 5, Issue 3–4, pp 319–338

Workflow Management Systems and ERP Systems: Differences, Commonalities, and Applications



Two important classes of information systems, Workflow Management Systems (WfMSs) and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, have been used to support e-business process redesign, integration, and management. While both technologies can help with business process automation, data transfer, and information sharing, the technological approach and features of solutions provided by WfMS and ERP are different. Currently, there is a lack of understanding of these two classes of information systems in the industry and academia, thus hindering their effective applications. In this paper, we present a comprehensive comparison between these two classes of systems. We discuss how the two types of systems can be used independently or together to develop intra- and inter-organizational application solutions. In particular, we also explore the roles of WfMS and ERP in the next generation of IT architecture based on Web Services. Our findings should help businesses make better decisions in the adoption of both WfMS and ERP in their e-business strategies.

workflow management system enterprise resource planning systems enterprise application integration business process management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    COSA, COSA Workflow, (2002).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    E.A. Stohr and J.L. Zhao, Workflow automation: Overview and research issues, Information Systems Frontiers 3(3) (2001) 281-196.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Zisman, Representation, Specification and automation of office procedures, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Business Administration, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (1977).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    C.A. Ellis, Information control nets: A mathematical model of office information flow, in: Conference on Simulation, Measurement and Modelling of Computer Systems (ACM, New York, 1979) pp. 225-239.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. Hammer, The OA mirage, in: Datamation (1984) pp. 36-46.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    C.A. Ellis and G.J. Nutt, Workflow: The process spectrum, in: NSF Workshop on Workflow and Process Automation in Information Systems, Athens, Georgia (1996) pp. 140-145.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Alonso, Advanced transaction models in workflow contexts, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (1996) pp. 574-581.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Kochut, A. Sheth and J.A. Miller, Optimizing workflow, Component Strategies 1(9) (1999) 45-57.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Jablonski, MOBILE: A modular workflow model and architecture, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Working Conference on Dynamic Modelling and Information Systems, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands (1994).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Reichert and P. Dadam, ADEPTflex-Supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Special Issue on Workflow Managament 10(2) (1998) 93-129.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C. Mohan et al., Exotica: A research perspective of workflow management systems, Data Engineering Bulletin 18(1) (1995) 19-26.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    WARIA, Workflow and Reengineering International Association, (2002).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    WfMC, Workflow Management Coalition, (2002).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    T. Lunn and S.A. Neff, Material Requirements Planning: Integrating Material Requirement Planning and Modern Business (McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, 1992).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    S.C. Blumenthal, Management Information Systems: A Framework for Planning and Development (Prentice Hall, NJ, 1969).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    TechRespublic, TechRespublic ERP supersite, Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Cowley, Study: BPM market primed for growth, (2002).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Landergren, Net presents ERP vendors with new challenges, (2002).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. Muth et al., Workflow history management in virtual enterprises using a light-weight workflow management system, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering, Sydney, Australia (1999) pp. 148-155, available at ~mlite/ (1999).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    METEOR, METEOR (Managing End-To-End OpeRations) Project Home Page, LSDIS Lab., http:// (2002).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    R.D. Hall et al., Using workflow to build an information management system for a geographically distributed genome sequence initiative, in: Genomics of Plants and Fungi, eds. R.A. Prade and H.J. Bohnert (Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 2003) pp. 359-371.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    K. Anyanwu et al., Healthcare enterprise process development and integration, Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, Special Issue on Health Knowledge Management (2003) (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Z. Luo, Knowledge sharing, coordinated exception handling, and intelligent problem solving to support cross-organizational business processes, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA (2000) 171 pp.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    M.H. Kang et al., A multilevel secure workflow management system, in: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (Springer, Heidelberg, 1999) pp. 271-285.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    CAPA, Course Approval Process Automation (CAPA), LSDIS Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA (1997).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    F. Leymann and D. Roller, Production Workflow: Concepts and Techniques (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2000).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    J. Cardoso, Quality of service and semantic composition of workflows, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA (2002) 215 pp.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    K. Kumar and J.V. Hillegersberg, ERP experiences and evolution, Communications of the ACM 43(4) (2000) 23-26.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    C.L. Iacovou, Managing MIS project failures: A crisis management perspective, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada (1998).Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    J.E. Scott and I. Vessey, Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations, Communications of the ACM (2002) 74-81.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    J. Warren and V. Lee, Culture, Organizational Dynamics and Workflow Implementation: Lessons from a Case of Failure (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, 2000) 30 pp.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick and A. Sheth, An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to infrastructure for automation, Distributed and Parallel Databases, an International Journal 3(2) (1995) 119-153.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    M. Rusinkiewicz and A.P. Sheth, Specification and execution of transactional workflows, in: Modern Database Systems: The Object Model, Interoperability, and Beyond, ed. W. Kim (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995) pp. 592-620.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    J. Eder and W. Liebhart, Workflow ecovery, in: IFCIS Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (Brussels, Belgium, 1996) pp. 124-134.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    D. Worah and A.P. Sheth, Transactions in transactional workflows, in:Advanced Transaction Models and Architectures, eds. S. Jajodia and L. Kerschberg (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997) pp. 3-34.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    A.P. Sheth, W. van der Aalst and I.B. Arpinar, Processes driving the networked economy, IEEE Concurrency 7(3) (1999) 18-31.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    M. zur Muehlen and R. Allen, Embedded vs. autonomous workflow-putting paradigms into perspective, in: Excellence in Practice, Vol. IV, Innovation and Excellence in Workflow and Knowledge Management, ed. L. Fischer (Future Startegies, Lighthouse Point, FL, 2000) pp. 49-58.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    J. Hopkins and M. Kessler, Companies squander billions on tech, USA TODAY (2002) 1A.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    A. Basu and A. Kumar, Research commentary: Workflow management issues in e-business, Information System Research 13(1) (2002) 1-14.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    D. Slater, Costly, painful and worth it, CIO Magazine (2002).Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Q-Link, BPM 2002: Market milestone report, Q-Link Technologies, (2002).Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    SeeBeyond, (2002) (see eBusiness integration demo for good overview of EAI type tools and applications).Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    J. Hagel and J.S. Brown, Your next IT strategy, Harvard Business Review 79(9) (2001) 105-113.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    SOAP, Simple object access protocol, (2002).Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    D. Fensel and C. Bussler, TheWeb Service modeling framework, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU) and Oracle Corporation, (2002).Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    G. Shegalov, M. Gillmann and G. Weikum, XML-enabled workflow management for e-services across heterogeneous platforms, The VLDB Journal 10 (2001) 91-103.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Q. Chen et al., Dynamic-Agents, workflow and XML for e-Commerce automation, in: EC-Web (2000) pp. 314-323.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    F. Leymann, D. Roller and M.T. Schmidt, Web Services and business process management, IBM Systems Journal 41(2) (2002) 98-211.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    J. Cardoso, C. Bussler and A. Sheth, Tutorial: Semantic Web Services and processes: Semantic composition and quality of service, in: International Federated Conferences: DOA/ODBASE/CooPIS 2002, Irvine, CA (2002).Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    S. Overby, This could be the start of something small, CIO Magazine, 021503/erp.html (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Matemática e EngenhariaUniversidade da MadeiraFunchalPortugal
  2. 2.MIS Department, Terry College of BusinessUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  3. 3.LSDIS Lab, Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations